水景的心理修复、偏好和安全:观看距离、水的类型和流动的影响

IF 1.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Jingwei Zhao, Xinyi Hu, Yidan Huang
{"title":"水景的心理修复、偏好和安全:观看距离、水的类型和流动的影响","authors":"Jingwei Zhao, Xinyi Hu, Yidan Huang","doi":"10.1007/s11355-024-00615-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Waterscapes are a valuable resource for aesthetic appreciation and human health, the majority of previous literature, however, generally explored these benefits by treating waterscapes as homogenous, limiting our understanding of the relationship between waterscape features and well-being. To address these knowledge gaps 16 videos were produced to represent waterscapes with different desired variables, and mental restoration, preference and perceived safety of these videos were measured by 53 respondents. The results indicate that: (1) within 20 m, the further away the visitors are from water bodies, the better the benefits will be; (2) in terms of mental restoration and preference, lakes are better than rivers, and fast water movement is more efficient than slow movement; (3) a protective fence along the water only enhance perceived safety; (4) females and postgraduate students obtain more restorative benefits from waterscapes than males and undergraduate students, respectively. These results can aid designers in enhancing the efficiency of waterscapes on the promotion of health and well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":49920,"journal":{"name":"Landscape and Ecological Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mental restoration, preference and safety of waterscapes: the effects of viewing distance, type and movement of water\",\"authors\":\"Jingwei Zhao, Xinyi Hu, Yidan Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11355-024-00615-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Waterscapes are a valuable resource for aesthetic appreciation and human health, the majority of previous literature, however, generally explored these benefits by treating waterscapes as homogenous, limiting our understanding of the relationship between waterscape features and well-being. To address these knowledge gaps 16 videos were produced to represent waterscapes with different desired variables, and mental restoration, preference and perceived safety of these videos were measured by 53 respondents. The results indicate that: (1) within 20 m, the further away the visitors are from water bodies, the better the benefits will be; (2) in terms of mental restoration and preference, lakes are better than rivers, and fast water movement is more efficient than slow movement; (3) a protective fence along the water only enhance perceived safety; (4) females and postgraduate students obtain more restorative benefits from waterscapes than males and undergraduate students, respectively. These results can aid designers in enhancing the efficiency of waterscapes on the promotion of health and well-being.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Landscape and Ecological Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Landscape and Ecological Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-024-00615-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Landscape and Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11355-024-00615-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

水景是美学欣赏和人类健康的宝贵资源,然而,以往的大多数文献在探讨这些益处时,一般都将水景视为同质景观,从而限制了我们对水景特征与福祉之间关系的理解。为了填补这些知识空白,我们制作了 16 个视频来表现具有不同预期变量的水景,并由 53 名受访者对这些视频的心理修复、偏好和感知安全性进行了测量。结果表明(1) 在 20 米范围内,游客距离水体越远,受益越大;(2) 在心理恢复和偏好方面,湖泊比河流更好,水流快比水流慢更有效;(3) 沿水体设置防护栏只会提高安全感;(4) 女性和研究生从水景中获得的恢复益处分别比男性和本科生多。这些结果可以帮助设计师提高水景观在促进健康和幸福方面的效率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Mental restoration, preference and safety of waterscapes: the effects of viewing distance, type and movement of water

Mental restoration, preference and safety of waterscapes: the effects of viewing distance, type and movement of water

Waterscapes are a valuable resource for aesthetic appreciation and human health, the majority of previous literature, however, generally explored these benefits by treating waterscapes as homogenous, limiting our understanding of the relationship between waterscape features and well-being. To address these knowledge gaps 16 videos were produced to represent waterscapes with different desired variables, and mental restoration, preference and perceived safety of these videos were measured by 53 respondents. The results indicate that: (1) within 20 m, the further away the visitors are from water bodies, the better the benefits will be; (2) in terms of mental restoration and preference, lakes are better than rivers, and fast water movement is more efficient than slow movement; (3) a protective fence along the water only enhance perceived safety; (4) females and postgraduate students obtain more restorative benefits from waterscapes than males and undergraduate students, respectively. These results can aid designers in enhancing the efficiency of waterscapes on the promotion of health and well-being.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Landscape and Ecological Engineering
Landscape and Ecological Engineering BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-ECOLOGY
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Landscape and Ecological Engineering is published by the International Consortium of Landscape and Ecological Engineering (ICLEE) in the interests of protecting and improving the environment in the face of biodiversity loss, desertification, global warming, and other environmental conditions. The journal invites original papers, reports, reviews and technical notes on all aspects of conservation, restoration, and management of ecosystems. It is not limited to purely scientific approaches, but welcomes technological and design approaches that provide useful and practical solutions to today''s environmental problems. The journal''s coverage is relevant to universities and research institutes, while its emphasis on the practical application of research will be important to all decision makers dealing with landscape planning and management problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信