{"title":"A.J.Berkovitz:犹太晚期古代诗篇的生命》。费城:费城:宾夕法尼亚大学出版社,2023 年;第 x + 263 页。","authors":"Eileen Schuller","doi":"10.1111/1467-9809.13088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In preparing this review, I chanced upon a short somewhat autobiographical essay by A. J. Berkovitz in <i>Ancient Jew Review</i>, October 24, 2023. There he reflected on the memories and the questions that animated the research behind this book. He recalled how his mother read the complete book of Psalms cover-to-cover in English or in Yiddish every single week and his puzzlement at why she found this practice meaningful and important. As an academic scholar he was trained in the rabbinic tradition and specifically in reading texts in terms of midrashic exegesis so as to dissect and interpret verse-by-verse. Yet he came to realize that the book of Psalms had a much broader and richer “life” both in the past and in the present.</p><p>In this book, instead of asking the more usual question “What meaning did the Jews produce from the Psalms?”, a question that focuses on interpretative methods and their results, Berkovitz reformulates the question to ask “How did the Jews encounter the Psalms?” (p. 11). He proposes that there are four major ways of engagement with the Psalter: as a material object, specifically a scroll; as songs to be sung in communal settings in the synagogue; as a book to be read for edification and consolation; and as an apotropaic defence against demonic powers. These modes of encounter are explored consecutively in the four chapters of the book.</p><p>The Introduction carefully sets out the parameters for the study, with special attention to what is included and what is omitted. The book does not attempt to treat the psalms as they were used and experienced in their earliest life within the Jerusalem temple cult. Nor does it tackle the formation of the book of the Psalter during the Second Temple period in what Berkovitz describes as “the pre-canonical chaos” (p. 7). For the period under study, there is a “single, distinguishable, concretely canonical entity” (p. 7), a text called <i>Sefer Tehillim</i>, the book of Psalms or the Psalter. The label “Late Antiquity” covers the late second century to mid-seventh century, that is, between the fall of Jerusalem and the rise of Islam, though the boundaries are porous on both ends. The geographical boundaries are Greco-Roman Palestine, Sassanian Persia and their environs; the linguistic focus is the Hebrew- and Aramaic-speaking Jews. The written sources are the classical literature of the rabbis. (Mishnah, Tosefta, tannaitic and amoraic midrash, Palestinian Talmud and Babylonian Talmud). Although occasional reference is made to Targum Psalms (the Aramaic translation) and to Midrash Psalms (a verse-by-verse commentary), these are not the focus since they probably are to be dated somewhat later than the period under consideration. A limited number of early Christian sources that touch on the use of the Psalter are introduced, especially in chapter four.</p><p>The first two chapters collect and examine almost every instance in which rabbinic literature refers to a “book of Psalms.” In fact, of course, the “book” was not a codex but a scroll, written on leather in black ink by a trained scribe, perhaps on as many as five scrolls (the five “books” of the Psalter). Given the fact that scrolls have not been preserved from the centuries under consideration, Berkovitz looks back to Psalm manuscripts of the Dead Sea Scrolls (first century <span>bc</span> and first century <span>ce</span>) and to later manuscripts (e.g. the Aleppo Codex of the tenth-century) to reconstruct the realia of material production: length of the scroll, scripts, line spacing, word spacing, layouts and erasure.</p><p>Chapter 2 explores how the actual material artefact — or the object as recalled in memory — influenced the ways in which the rabbis read and interpreted the Psalms. Anecdotes in rabbinic literature depict a wide variety of activities: reading as a leisure activity, affective reading that stirs one to action, scholastic elite reading in a communal study session, reading for education and ethical instruction. Berkovitz quotes a number of texts that illustrate how the scroll format itself promoted a linear reading across a column and down a page (it is difficult to jump around in a scroll!) and how this in turn shaped features of the exegesis (pp. 65–68).</p><p>Chapter 3 takes up oral modes of engagement with the Psalter, specifically in the liturgy, that is, with the formal and mandated recitation of psalms in a synagogue setting. Some scholars (for names see p. 194, n. 30) have claimed that the singing of psalms transitioned from the temple to the synagogue already in the Second Temple period or soon thereafter and hence that early Christian communities adopted the practice of daily psalmody from the synagogue. Berkovitz argues instead that there was only a gradual and “fitful rise” (p. 80) of daily psalmody in the amoraic period (200–650 <span>ce</span>) that did not stabilize until the geonic period. As to the reason why the psalms were introduced, Berkovitz proposes a number of complementary factors that may have influenced the embedment of psalms into the liturgy; for example, the rabbinic use of verses from the Psalms to justify revolutions in the liturgy (e.g. the eighteen mentions of God's name in Ps 29 to undergird the eighteen blessings of the Amidah) and the reframing of the synagogue, even architecturally, from a place of community gathering and instruction in the Law to a place of prayer. He even raises the question — as deserving further study — of whether the popularity of Psalms in Christian worship from the fourth century onwards may have influenced the rise of daily psalmody in rabbinic worship.</p><p>Chapter 4 moves from the public to the personal, the behaviour that Berkovitz labels as “Psalm piety.” Here he examines such practices as the recitation of psalms at midnight, the use of psalms on the death bed, the voluntary recitation of psalms in the synagogue apart from the liturgy, and “Bedtime Psalm piety” (p. 137) that offered protection from demons. A short section (pp. 110–18) gives some tantalizing examples of a similar “Early Christian Psalm Piety.”</p><p>This book was a delight to read. Although it began as a doctoral dissertation (with Martha Himmelfarb at Princeton University), it is thoroughly accessible to the non-specialist. Berkovitz has a gift for contextualizing complex rabbinic texts and guiding the novice reader through them. He writes with a gracious humility, explaining that this is not “the” <i>Life of Psalms</i>, but “a” <i>Life of Psalms</i>. Throughout the book he suggests many areas for further study, especially in terms of Jewish and Christian interaction, and we can only hope that he will continue this work.</p>","PeriodicalId":44035,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY","volume":"48 4","pages":"491-493"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-9809.13088","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A.J. Berkovitz: A Life of Psalms in Jewish Late Antiquity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2023; pp. x + 263.\",\"authors\":\"Eileen Schuller\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1467-9809.13088\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In preparing this review, I chanced upon a short somewhat autobiographical essay by A. J. Berkovitz in <i>Ancient Jew Review</i>, October 24, 2023. There he reflected on the memories and the questions that animated the research behind this book. He recalled how his mother read the complete book of Psalms cover-to-cover in English or in Yiddish every single week and his puzzlement at why she found this practice meaningful and important. As an academic scholar he was trained in the rabbinic tradition and specifically in reading texts in terms of midrashic exegesis so as to dissect and interpret verse-by-verse. Yet he came to realize that the book of Psalms had a much broader and richer “life” both in the past and in the present.</p><p>In this book, instead of asking the more usual question “What meaning did the Jews produce from the Psalms?”, a question that focuses on interpretative methods and their results, Berkovitz reformulates the question to ask “How did the Jews encounter the Psalms?” (p. 11). He proposes that there are four major ways of engagement with the Psalter: as a material object, specifically a scroll; as songs to be sung in communal settings in the synagogue; as a book to be read for edification and consolation; and as an apotropaic defence against demonic powers. These modes of encounter are explored consecutively in the four chapters of the book.</p><p>The Introduction carefully sets out the parameters for the study, with special attention to what is included and what is omitted. The book does not attempt to treat the psalms as they were used and experienced in their earliest life within the Jerusalem temple cult. Nor does it tackle the formation of the book of the Psalter during the Second Temple period in what Berkovitz describes as “the pre-canonical chaos” (p. 7). For the period under study, there is a “single, distinguishable, concretely canonical entity” (p. 7), a text called <i>Sefer Tehillim</i>, the book of Psalms or the Psalter. The label “Late Antiquity” covers the late second century to mid-seventh century, that is, between the fall of Jerusalem and the rise of Islam, though the boundaries are porous on both ends. The geographical boundaries are Greco-Roman Palestine, Sassanian Persia and their environs; the linguistic focus is the Hebrew- and Aramaic-speaking Jews. The written sources are the classical literature of the rabbis. (Mishnah, Tosefta, tannaitic and amoraic midrash, Palestinian Talmud and Babylonian Talmud). Although occasional reference is made to Targum Psalms (the Aramaic translation) and to Midrash Psalms (a verse-by-verse commentary), these are not the focus since they probably are to be dated somewhat later than the period under consideration. A limited number of early Christian sources that touch on the use of the Psalter are introduced, especially in chapter four.</p><p>The first two chapters collect and examine almost every instance in which rabbinic literature refers to a “book of Psalms.” In fact, of course, the “book” was not a codex but a scroll, written on leather in black ink by a trained scribe, perhaps on as many as five scrolls (the five “books” of the Psalter). Given the fact that scrolls have not been preserved from the centuries under consideration, Berkovitz looks back to Psalm manuscripts of the Dead Sea Scrolls (first century <span>bc</span> and first century <span>ce</span>) and to later manuscripts (e.g. the Aleppo Codex of the tenth-century) to reconstruct the realia of material production: length of the scroll, scripts, line spacing, word spacing, layouts and erasure.</p><p>Chapter 2 explores how the actual material artefact — or the object as recalled in memory — influenced the ways in which the rabbis read and interpreted the Psalms. Anecdotes in rabbinic literature depict a wide variety of activities: reading as a leisure activity, affective reading that stirs one to action, scholastic elite reading in a communal study session, reading for education and ethical instruction. Berkovitz quotes a number of texts that illustrate how the scroll format itself promoted a linear reading across a column and down a page (it is difficult to jump around in a scroll!) and how this in turn shaped features of the exegesis (pp. 65–68).</p><p>Chapter 3 takes up oral modes of engagement with the Psalter, specifically in the liturgy, that is, with the formal and mandated recitation of psalms in a synagogue setting. Some scholars (for names see p. 194, n. 30) have claimed that the singing of psalms transitioned from the temple to the synagogue already in the Second Temple period or soon thereafter and hence that early Christian communities adopted the practice of daily psalmody from the synagogue. Berkovitz argues instead that there was only a gradual and “fitful rise” (p. 80) of daily psalmody in the amoraic period (200–650 <span>ce</span>) that did not stabilize until the geonic period. As to the reason why the psalms were introduced, Berkovitz proposes a number of complementary factors that may have influenced the embedment of psalms into the liturgy; for example, the rabbinic use of verses from the Psalms to justify revolutions in the liturgy (e.g. the eighteen mentions of God's name in Ps 29 to undergird the eighteen blessings of the Amidah) and the reframing of the synagogue, even architecturally, from a place of community gathering and instruction in the Law to a place of prayer. He even raises the question — as deserving further study — of whether the popularity of Psalms in Christian worship from the fourth century onwards may have influenced the rise of daily psalmody in rabbinic worship.</p><p>Chapter 4 moves from the public to the personal, the behaviour that Berkovitz labels as “Psalm piety.” Here he examines such practices as the recitation of psalms at midnight, the use of psalms on the death bed, the voluntary recitation of psalms in the synagogue apart from the liturgy, and “Bedtime Psalm piety” (p. 137) that offered protection from demons. A short section (pp. 110–18) gives some tantalizing examples of a similar “Early Christian Psalm Piety.”</p><p>This book was a delight to read. Although it began as a doctoral dissertation (with Martha Himmelfarb at Princeton University), it is thoroughly accessible to the non-specialist. Berkovitz has a gift for contextualizing complex rabbinic texts and guiding the novice reader through them. He writes with a gracious humility, explaining that this is not “the” <i>Life of Psalms</i>, but “a” <i>Life of Psalms</i>. Throughout the book he suggests many areas for further study, especially in terms of Jewish and Christian interaction, and we can only hope that he will continue this work.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44035,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY\",\"volume\":\"48 4\",\"pages\":\"491-493\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1467-9809.13088\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9809.13088\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF RELIGIOUS HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9809.13088","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在准备这篇评论的过程中,我偶然看到了a . J. Berkovitz在2023年10月24日《古代犹太人评论》上发表的一篇带有自传性质的短文。在那里,他反思了激发本书背后研究的记忆和问题。他回忆起他的母亲是如何每周从头到尾用英语或意第绪语阅读整本《诗篇》的,他对她为什么认为这种做法有意义和重要感到困惑。作为一名学术学者,他接受过拉比传统的训练,特别是在阅读米德拉西训诂学的文本方面,以便逐节剖析和解释。然而,他逐渐意识到,诗篇在过去和现在都有更广泛、更丰富的“生命”。在这本书中,我们没有问更常见的问题“犹太人从诗篇中产生了什么意义?”,这是一个关注解释方法及其结果的问题,伯科维茨将这个问题重新表述为“犹太人是如何遇到诗篇的?”(第11页)。他提出,有四种主要的方式与诗篇接触:作为一个物质对象,特别是一个卷轴;在犹太教堂的公共场所唱的歌;作为一本书来阅读的启迪和安慰;作为对恶魔力量的净化防御。这些相遇的模式在全书的四个章节中进行了连续的探讨。引言仔细列出了研究的参数,特别注意包括什么和省略什么。这本书并没有试图对待诗篇,因为他们是使用和经历在他们最早的生活在耶路撒冷圣殿崇拜。它也没有处理第二圣殿时期《诗篇》的形成,伯克维茨将其描述为“正典前的混乱”(第7页)。在研究的时期,有一个“单一的、可区分的、具体的正典实体”(第7页),一个叫做《诗篇》或《诗篇》的文本。“古代晚期”这个标签涵盖了二世纪晚期到七世纪中期,也就是说,介于耶路撒冷的沦陷和伊斯兰教的兴起之间,尽管两端的边界都是漏洞百出的。地理边界是希腊罗马时期的巴勒斯坦、萨珊波斯及其周边地区;语言的焦点是讲希伯来语和亚拉姆语的犹太人。书面资料是拉比们的经典文献。(密西拿,Tosefta,坦尼和阿摩利人米德拉什,巴勒斯坦塔木德和巴比伦塔木德)。虽然偶尔会提到《塔古姆诗篇》(阿拉姆语译本)和《米德拉什诗篇》(逐句注释),但这些都不是重点,因为它们的日期可能比所考虑的时期要晚一些。介绍了有限数量的早期基督教资料,涉及诗篇的使用,特别是在第四章。前两章收集并研究了拉比文献中提到的“诗篇”的几乎每一个例子。当然,事实上,“书”不是手抄本,而是卷轴,由训练有素的抄写员用黑色墨水写在皮革上,可能多达五卷(《诗篇》的五卷)。鉴于古卷在考虑的几个世纪中没有保存下来,Berkovitz回顾了死海古卷的诗篇手稿(公元前一世纪和公元一世纪)和后来的手稿(例如十世纪的阿勒颇抄本),以重建物质生产的现实:卷轴的长度,文字,行间距,字间距,布局和擦除。第二章探讨了实际的人工制品——或者记忆中的物体——是如何影响拉比们阅读和解释诗篇的方式的。拉比文学中的轶事描述了各种各样的活动:作为休闲活动的阅读,激发人们行动的情感阅读,学术精英在公共学习会议上的阅读,教育和道德指导的阅读。Berkovitz引用了一些文本来说明卷轴格式本身是如何促进一栏一页的线性阅读的(在卷轴中很难跳跃!),以及这反过来又是如何塑造了注释的特点的(第65-68页)。第三章讨论了与《诗篇》接触的口头模式,特别是在礼拜仪式中,也就是说,在犹太教堂的环境中,正式和强制性的吟诵《诗篇》。一些学者(关于名字,见第194页,第30页)声称,在第二圣殿时期或之后不久,赞美诗的吟唱就已经从圣殿转移到犹太教堂了,因此早期的基督教团体采用了犹太教堂的日常赞美诗的做法。相反,Berkovitz认为,在阿摩拉时期(公元200-650年),每日的诗篇只有一个逐渐和“断断续续的上升”(第80页),直到地质时期才稳定下来。 至于为什么要引入圣诗,Berkovitz提出了一些互补的因素,这些因素可能影响了圣诗融入礼拜仪式;例如,拉比使用《诗篇》中的诗句来证明礼仪中的革命是合理的(例如,在《诗篇》第29篇中18次提到上帝的名字,以巩固阿米达的18个祝福),以及对犹太教堂的重新设计,甚至在建筑上,从社区聚会和教导律法的地方变成了祈祷的地方。他甚至提出了一个值得进一步研究的问题,即从四世纪开始,基督教崇拜中诗篇的流行是否影响了拉比崇拜中每日诗篇的兴起。第四章从公众转向个人,伯克维茨称之为“诗篇虔诚”的行为。在这里,他考察了午夜吟诵赞美诗、临终前吟诵赞美诗、在犹太教堂除礼拜仪式外自愿吟诵赞美诗,以及“睡前吟诵虔诚赞美诗”(第137页)等行为,这些行为可以保护人们免受恶魔的侵扰。一个简短的部分(110-18页)给出了一些类似的“早期基督教诗篇虔诚”的诱人例子。这本书读起来令人愉快。虽然它最初是一篇博士论文(与普林斯顿大学的Martha Himmelfarb一起),但它对非专业人士来说是完全可以理解的。Berkovitz有天赋将复杂的拉比文本语境化,并引导新手读者通过它们。他以一种亲切的谦卑来写作,解释说这不是“诗篇的生活”,而是“诗篇的生活”。在整本书中,他提出了许多有待进一步研究的领域,特别是在犹太教和基督教的相互作用方面,我们只能希望他能继续这项工作。
A.J. Berkovitz: A Life of Psalms in Jewish Late Antiquity. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 2023; pp. x + 263.
In preparing this review, I chanced upon a short somewhat autobiographical essay by A. J. Berkovitz in Ancient Jew Review, October 24, 2023. There he reflected on the memories and the questions that animated the research behind this book. He recalled how his mother read the complete book of Psalms cover-to-cover in English or in Yiddish every single week and his puzzlement at why she found this practice meaningful and important. As an academic scholar he was trained in the rabbinic tradition and specifically in reading texts in terms of midrashic exegesis so as to dissect and interpret verse-by-verse. Yet he came to realize that the book of Psalms had a much broader and richer “life” both in the past and in the present.
In this book, instead of asking the more usual question “What meaning did the Jews produce from the Psalms?”, a question that focuses on interpretative methods and their results, Berkovitz reformulates the question to ask “How did the Jews encounter the Psalms?” (p. 11). He proposes that there are four major ways of engagement with the Psalter: as a material object, specifically a scroll; as songs to be sung in communal settings in the synagogue; as a book to be read for edification and consolation; and as an apotropaic defence against demonic powers. These modes of encounter are explored consecutively in the four chapters of the book.
The Introduction carefully sets out the parameters for the study, with special attention to what is included and what is omitted. The book does not attempt to treat the psalms as they were used and experienced in their earliest life within the Jerusalem temple cult. Nor does it tackle the formation of the book of the Psalter during the Second Temple period in what Berkovitz describes as “the pre-canonical chaos” (p. 7). For the period under study, there is a “single, distinguishable, concretely canonical entity” (p. 7), a text called Sefer Tehillim, the book of Psalms or the Psalter. The label “Late Antiquity” covers the late second century to mid-seventh century, that is, between the fall of Jerusalem and the rise of Islam, though the boundaries are porous on both ends. The geographical boundaries are Greco-Roman Palestine, Sassanian Persia and their environs; the linguistic focus is the Hebrew- and Aramaic-speaking Jews. The written sources are the classical literature of the rabbis. (Mishnah, Tosefta, tannaitic and amoraic midrash, Palestinian Talmud and Babylonian Talmud). Although occasional reference is made to Targum Psalms (the Aramaic translation) and to Midrash Psalms (a verse-by-verse commentary), these are not the focus since they probably are to be dated somewhat later than the period under consideration. A limited number of early Christian sources that touch on the use of the Psalter are introduced, especially in chapter four.
The first two chapters collect and examine almost every instance in which rabbinic literature refers to a “book of Psalms.” In fact, of course, the “book” was not a codex but a scroll, written on leather in black ink by a trained scribe, perhaps on as many as five scrolls (the five “books” of the Psalter). Given the fact that scrolls have not been preserved from the centuries under consideration, Berkovitz looks back to Psalm manuscripts of the Dead Sea Scrolls (first century bc and first century ce) and to later manuscripts (e.g. the Aleppo Codex of the tenth-century) to reconstruct the realia of material production: length of the scroll, scripts, line spacing, word spacing, layouts and erasure.
Chapter 2 explores how the actual material artefact — or the object as recalled in memory — influenced the ways in which the rabbis read and interpreted the Psalms. Anecdotes in rabbinic literature depict a wide variety of activities: reading as a leisure activity, affective reading that stirs one to action, scholastic elite reading in a communal study session, reading for education and ethical instruction. Berkovitz quotes a number of texts that illustrate how the scroll format itself promoted a linear reading across a column and down a page (it is difficult to jump around in a scroll!) and how this in turn shaped features of the exegesis (pp. 65–68).
Chapter 3 takes up oral modes of engagement with the Psalter, specifically in the liturgy, that is, with the formal and mandated recitation of psalms in a synagogue setting. Some scholars (for names see p. 194, n. 30) have claimed that the singing of psalms transitioned from the temple to the synagogue already in the Second Temple period or soon thereafter and hence that early Christian communities adopted the practice of daily psalmody from the synagogue. Berkovitz argues instead that there was only a gradual and “fitful rise” (p. 80) of daily psalmody in the amoraic period (200–650 ce) that did not stabilize until the geonic period. As to the reason why the psalms were introduced, Berkovitz proposes a number of complementary factors that may have influenced the embedment of psalms into the liturgy; for example, the rabbinic use of verses from the Psalms to justify revolutions in the liturgy (e.g. the eighteen mentions of God's name in Ps 29 to undergird the eighteen blessings of the Amidah) and the reframing of the synagogue, even architecturally, from a place of community gathering and instruction in the Law to a place of prayer. He even raises the question — as deserving further study — of whether the popularity of Psalms in Christian worship from the fourth century onwards may have influenced the rise of daily psalmody in rabbinic worship.
Chapter 4 moves from the public to the personal, the behaviour that Berkovitz labels as “Psalm piety.” Here he examines such practices as the recitation of psalms at midnight, the use of psalms on the death bed, the voluntary recitation of psalms in the synagogue apart from the liturgy, and “Bedtime Psalm piety” (p. 137) that offered protection from demons. A short section (pp. 110–18) gives some tantalizing examples of a similar “Early Christian Psalm Piety.”
This book was a delight to read. Although it began as a doctoral dissertation (with Martha Himmelfarb at Princeton University), it is thoroughly accessible to the non-specialist. Berkovitz has a gift for contextualizing complex rabbinic texts and guiding the novice reader through them. He writes with a gracious humility, explaining that this is not “the” Life of Psalms, but “a” Life of Psalms. Throughout the book he suggests many areas for further study, especially in terms of Jewish and Christian interaction, and we can only hope that he will continue this work.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Religious History is a vital source of high quality information for all those interested in the place of religion in history. The Journal reviews current work on the history of religions and their relationship with all aspects of human experience. With high quality international contributors, the journal explores religion and its related subjects, along with debates on comparative method and theory in religious history.