信息温室:医学试验规避者的最佳说服力

Zhuo Chen
{"title":"信息温室:医学试验规避者的最佳说服力","authors":"Zhuo Chen","doi":"arxiv-2407.02948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Patients often delay or reject medical tests due to information avoidance,\nwhich hinders timely reception of necessary treatments. This paper studies the\noptimal information policy to persuade an information-avoidant patient to\nundergo the test and make the best choice that maximizes his health. The\npatient sequentially decides whether to take the test and the optimal treatment\nplan. The information provided is about the background knowledge of the\ndisease, which is complementary with the test result, and disclosure can take\nplace both before and after the test decision. The optimal information policy\ndepends on whether the patient is willing to be tested when he is completely\npessimistic. If so, the optimal policy features \\textit{preemptive warning}:\nthe disclosure only takes place before the test, and the bad news guarantees\nthe patient to be tested and be treated even without further information. If\nnot, the optimal policy constructs an \\textit{information greenhouse}: an\ninformation structure that provides high anticipatory utility is committed when\nthe patient is tested and the test result is bad. I consider extensions to\ngeneral information preference and ex ante participation constraint.","PeriodicalId":501188,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Information Greenhouse: Optimal Persuasion for Medical Test-Avoiders\",\"authors\":\"Zhuo Chen\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.02948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Patients often delay or reject medical tests due to information avoidance,\\nwhich hinders timely reception of necessary treatments. This paper studies the\\noptimal information policy to persuade an information-avoidant patient to\\nundergo the test and make the best choice that maximizes his health. The\\npatient sequentially decides whether to take the test and the optimal treatment\\nplan. The information provided is about the background knowledge of the\\ndisease, which is complementary with the test result, and disclosure can take\\nplace both before and after the test decision. The optimal information policy\\ndepends on whether the patient is willing to be tested when he is completely\\npessimistic. If so, the optimal policy features \\\\textit{preemptive warning}:\\nthe disclosure only takes place before the test, and the bad news guarantees\\nthe patient to be tested and be treated even without further information. If\\nnot, the optimal policy constructs an \\\\textit{information greenhouse}: an\\ninformation structure that provides high anticipatory utility is committed when\\nthe patient is tested and the test result is bad. I consider extensions to\\ngeneral information preference and ex ante participation constraint.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.02948\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.02948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者常常因为信息回避而延迟或拒绝医学检查,这阻碍了他们及时接受必要的治疗。本文研究了最佳信息政策,以说服信息回避患者接受检查,并做出使其健康最大化的最佳选择。患者依次决定是否接受检查和最佳治疗方案。所提供的信息是关于疾病的背景知识,与检测结果相辅相成,信息披露可以在检测决定之前和之后进行。最佳信息政策取决于患者在完全悲观时是否愿意接受检测。如果是,最优政策的特点是:信息披露只在检测前进行,坏消息保证病人接受检测并在没有进一步信息的情况下接受治疗。如果不是这样,最优政策就会构建一个(textit{信息温室}:当病人接受检查且检查结果不好时,就会承诺提供高预期效用的信息结构。我考虑了一般信息偏好和事前参与约束的扩展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Information Greenhouse: Optimal Persuasion for Medical Test-Avoiders
Patients often delay or reject medical tests due to information avoidance, which hinders timely reception of necessary treatments. This paper studies the optimal information policy to persuade an information-avoidant patient to undergo the test and make the best choice that maximizes his health. The patient sequentially decides whether to take the test and the optimal treatment plan. The information provided is about the background knowledge of the disease, which is complementary with the test result, and disclosure can take place both before and after the test decision. The optimal information policy depends on whether the patient is willing to be tested when he is completely pessimistic. If so, the optimal policy features \textit{preemptive warning}: the disclosure only takes place before the test, and the bad news guarantees the patient to be tested and be treated even without further information. If not, the optimal policy constructs an \textit{information greenhouse}: an information structure that provides high anticipatory utility is committed when the patient is tested and the test result is bad. I consider extensions to general information preference and ex ante participation constraint.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信