{"title":"探索管理教育和培训中的设计思维动态:批判性评论、分类分析和实际意义","authors":"Arushi Bathla, Ginni Chawla, Mahrane Hofaidhllaoui, Marina Dabic","doi":"10.1108/ejim-12-2023-1108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>Applying critical analysis as the methodological framework for assessing the literature, the review seeks to present a summary and evaluation of the existing body of knowledge. This approach helps to establish the basis for developing forthcoming recommendations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The articles were selected through a Systematic Literature Review following the PRISMA guidelines, and utilising Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, and the Education Resources Information Center database. Field taxonomy is presented based on the outcomes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Through a critical review, we offer narrative arguments that document the shortcomings in the existing literature by scrutinising study designs and highlighting suboptimal approaches. Finally, we issue a call to action for future research, envisioning its potential to reorient and reconstruct the field while enhancing the quality of future studies. This proactive stance aims to foster the development of more competent and insightful perspectives, theories, and policy recommendations within design thinking in management education and training.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The research in this field holds significant potential for providing valuable practical and policy insights, contingent upon the rigorous and thorough execution of studies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This article presents a robust critical review of 57 state-of-the-art articles investigating design thinking in the context of management education and training.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":51462,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Innovation Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the dynamics of design thinking in management education and training: a critical review, taxonomic analysis and practical implications\",\"authors\":\"Arushi Bathla, Ginni Chawla, Mahrane Hofaidhllaoui, Marina Dabic\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ejim-12-2023-1108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>Applying critical analysis as the methodological framework for assessing the literature, the review seeks to present a summary and evaluation of the existing body of knowledge. This approach helps to establish the basis for developing forthcoming recommendations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The articles were selected through a Systematic Literature Review following the PRISMA guidelines, and utilising Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, and the Education Resources Information Center database. Field taxonomy is presented based on the outcomes.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Through a critical review, we offer narrative arguments that document the shortcomings in the existing literature by scrutinising study designs and highlighting suboptimal approaches. Finally, we issue a call to action for future research, envisioning its potential to reorient and reconstruct the field while enhancing the quality of future studies. This proactive stance aims to foster the development of more competent and insightful perspectives, theories, and policy recommendations within design thinking in management education and training.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>The research in this field holds significant potential for providing valuable practical and policy insights, contingent upon the rigorous and thorough execution of studies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This article presents a robust critical review of 57 state-of-the-art articles investigating design thinking in the context of management education and training.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":51462,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Innovation Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Innovation Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-12-2023-1108\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Innovation Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ejim-12-2023-1108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的本综述以批判性分析作为评估文献的方法框架,旨在对现有知识体系进行总结和评估。设计/方法/途径按照 PRISMA 准则,并利用 Scopus、Web of Science、Science Direct 和教育资源信息中心数据库,通过系统文献综述筛选文章。通过批判性综述,我们提供了叙述性论据,通过对研究设计的审查和对次优方法的强调,记录了现有文献的不足之处。最后,我们对未来的研究发出了行动呼吁,设想其在提高未来研究质量的同时,有可能重新定位和重建该领域。这种积极主动的立场旨在促进管理教育与培训中的设计思维发展出更有能力、更有洞察力的观点、理论和政策建议。原创性/价值本文对57篇研究管理教育与培训中的设计思维的最新文章进行了有力的批判性评论。
Exploring the dynamics of design thinking in management education and training: a critical review, taxonomic analysis and practical implications
Purpose
Applying critical analysis as the methodological framework for assessing the literature, the review seeks to present a summary and evaluation of the existing body of knowledge. This approach helps to establish the basis for developing forthcoming recommendations.
Design/methodology/approach
The articles were selected through a Systematic Literature Review following the PRISMA guidelines, and utilising Scopus, Web of Science, Science Direct, and the Education Resources Information Center database. Field taxonomy is presented based on the outcomes.
Findings
Through a critical review, we offer narrative arguments that document the shortcomings in the existing literature by scrutinising study designs and highlighting suboptimal approaches. Finally, we issue a call to action for future research, envisioning its potential to reorient and reconstruct the field while enhancing the quality of future studies. This proactive stance aims to foster the development of more competent and insightful perspectives, theories, and policy recommendations within design thinking in management education and training.
Practical implications
The research in this field holds significant potential for providing valuable practical and policy insights, contingent upon the rigorous and thorough execution of studies.
Originality/value
This article presents a robust critical review of 57 state-of-the-art articles investigating design thinking in the context of management education and training.
期刊介绍:
The subject of innovation is receiving increased interest both from companies because of their increased awareness of the impact of innovation in determining market success and also from the research community. Academics are increasingly beginning to place innovation as a priority area in their research agenda. This impetus has been partly fuelled by the Economic & Social Research Council (ESRC) who have designated innovation as one of nine research areas in their research initiative schemes.