Andrew Jansen, Steve van Bodegraven, Andrew Esparon, Varma Gadhiraju, Samantha Walker, Constanza Buccella, Kris Bock, David Loewensteiner, Thomas J. Mooney, Andrew J. Harford, Renee E. Bartolo, Chris L. Humphrey
{"title":"利用水下摄像和深度学习监控热带淡水鱼类","authors":"Andrew Jansen, Steve van Bodegraven, Andrew Esparon, Varma Gadhiraju, Samantha Walker, Constanza Buccella, Kris Bock, David Loewensteiner, Thomas J. Mooney, Andrew J. Harford, Renee E. Bartolo, Chris L. Humphrey","doi":"10.1071/mf23166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong> Context</strong><p>The application of deep learning to monitor tropical freshwater fish assemblages and detect potential anthropogenic impacts is poorly understood.</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>This study aimed to compare the results between trained human observers and deep learning, using the fish monitoring program for impact detection at Ranger Uranium Mine as a case study.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>Fish abundance (MaxN) was measured by trained observers and deep learning. Microsoft’s <i>Azure Custom Vision</i> was used to annotate, label and train deep learning models with fish imagery. PERMANOVA was used to compare method, year and billabong.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>Deep learning model training on 23 fish taxa resulted in mean average precision, precision and recall of 83.6, 81.3 and 89.1%, respectively. PERMANOVA revealed significant differences between the two methods, but no significant interaction was observed in method, billabong and year.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>These results suggest that the distribution of fish taxa and their relative abundances determined by deep learning and trained observers reflect similar changes between control and exposed billabongs over a 3-year period.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>The implications of these method-related differences should be carefully considered in the context of impact detection, and further research is required to more accurately characterise small-growing schooling fish species, which were found to contribute significantly to the observed differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":18209,"journal":{"name":"Marine and Freshwater Research","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monitoring tropical freshwater fish with underwater videography and deep learning\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Jansen, Steve van Bodegraven, Andrew Esparon, Varma Gadhiraju, Samantha Walker, Constanza Buccella, Kris Bock, David Loewensteiner, Thomas J. Mooney, Andrew J. Harford, Renee E. Bartolo, Chris L. Humphrey\",\"doi\":\"10.1071/mf23166\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong> Context</strong><p>The application of deep learning to monitor tropical freshwater fish assemblages and detect potential anthropogenic impacts is poorly understood.</p><strong> Aims</strong><p>This study aimed to compare the results between trained human observers and deep learning, using the fish monitoring program for impact detection at Ranger Uranium Mine as a case study.</p><strong> Methods</strong><p>Fish abundance (MaxN) was measured by trained observers and deep learning. Microsoft’s <i>Azure Custom Vision</i> was used to annotate, label and train deep learning models with fish imagery. PERMANOVA was used to compare method, year and billabong.</p><strong> Key results</strong><p>Deep learning model training on 23 fish taxa resulted in mean average precision, precision and recall of 83.6, 81.3 and 89.1%, respectively. PERMANOVA revealed significant differences between the two methods, but no significant interaction was observed in method, billabong and year.</p><strong> Conclusions</strong><p>These results suggest that the distribution of fish taxa and their relative abundances determined by deep learning and trained observers reflect similar changes between control and exposed billabongs over a 3-year period.</p><strong> Implications</strong><p>The implications of these method-related differences should be carefully considered in the context of impact detection, and further research is required to more accurately characterise small-growing schooling fish species, which were found to contribute significantly to the observed differences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marine and Freshwater Research\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marine and Freshwater Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1071/mf23166\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine and Freshwater Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/mf23166","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Monitoring tropical freshwater fish with underwater videography and deep learning
Context
The application of deep learning to monitor tropical freshwater fish assemblages and detect potential anthropogenic impacts is poorly understood.
Aims
This study aimed to compare the results between trained human observers and deep learning, using the fish monitoring program for impact detection at Ranger Uranium Mine as a case study.
Methods
Fish abundance (MaxN) was measured by trained observers and deep learning. Microsoft’s Azure Custom Vision was used to annotate, label and train deep learning models with fish imagery. PERMANOVA was used to compare method, year and billabong.
Key results
Deep learning model training on 23 fish taxa resulted in mean average precision, precision and recall of 83.6, 81.3 and 89.1%, respectively. PERMANOVA revealed significant differences between the two methods, but no significant interaction was observed in method, billabong and year.
Conclusions
These results suggest that the distribution of fish taxa and their relative abundances determined by deep learning and trained observers reflect similar changes between control and exposed billabongs over a 3-year period.
Implications
The implications of these method-related differences should be carefully considered in the context of impact detection, and further research is required to more accurately characterise small-growing schooling fish species, which were found to contribute significantly to the observed differences.
期刊介绍:
Marine and Freshwater Research is an international and interdisciplinary journal publishing contributions on all aquatic environments. The journal’s content addresses broad conceptual questions and investigations about the ecology and management of aquatic environments. Environments range from groundwaters, wetlands and streams to estuaries, rocky shores, reefs and the open ocean. Subject areas include, but are not limited to: aquatic ecosystem processes, such as nutrient cycling; biology; ecology; biogeochemistry; biogeography and phylogeography; hydrology; limnology; oceanography; toxicology; conservation and management; and ecosystem services. Contributions that are interdisciplinary and of wide interest and consider the social-ecological and institutional issues associated with managing marine and freshwater ecosystems are welcomed.
Marine and Freshwater Research is a valuable resource for researchers in industry and academia, resource managers, environmental consultants, students and amateurs who are interested in any aspect of the aquatic sciences.
Marine and Freshwater Research is published with the endorsement of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) and the Australian Academy of Science.