{"title":"范式定理、其强否定和博弈的确定性","authors":"Wim Veldman","doi":"10.1007/s00153-024-00930-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the context of a weak formal theory called Basic Intuitionistic Mathematics <span>\\(\\textsf{BIM}\\)</span>, we study Brouwer’s <i>Fan Theorem</i> and a strong negation of the Fan Theorem, <i>Kleene’s Alternative (to the Fan Theorem)</i>. We prove that the Fan Theorem is equivalent to <i>contrapositions</i> of a number of intuitionistically accepted axioms of countable choice and that Kleene’s Alternative is equivalent to <i>strong negations</i> of these statements. We discuss finite and infinite games and introduce a constructively useful notion of <i>determinacy</i>. We prove that the Fan Theorem is equivalent to the <i>Intuitionistic Determinacy Theorem</i>. This theorem says that every subset of Cantor space <span>\\(2^\\omega \\)</span> is, in our constructively meaningful sense, determinate. Kleene’s Alternative is equivalent to a strong negation of a special case of this theorem. We also consider a <i>uniform intermediate value theorem</i> and a <i>compactness theorem for classical propositional logic</i>. The Fan Theorem is equivalent to each of these theorems and Kleene’s Alternative is equivalent to strong negations of them. We end with a note on <i>‘stronger’</i> Fan Theorems. The paper is a sequel to Veldman (Arch Math Logic 53:621–693, 2014).</p>","PeriodicalId":8350,"journal":{"name":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Fan Theorem, its strong negation, and the determinacy of games\",\"authors\":\"Wim Veldman\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00153-024-00930-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the context of a weak formal theory called Basic Intuitionistic Mathematics <span>\\\\(\\\\textsf{BIM}\\\\)</span>, we study Brouwer’s <i>Fan Theorem</i> and a strong negation of the Fan Theorem, <i>Kleene’s Alternative (to the Fan Theorem)</i>. We prove that the Fan Theorem is equivalent to <i>contrapositions</i> of a number of intuitionistically accepted axioms of countable choice and that Kleene’s Alternative is equivalent to <i>strong negations</i> of these statements. We discuss finite and infinite games and introduce a constructively useful notion of <i>determinacy</i>. We prove that the Fan Theorem is equivalent to the <i>Intuitionistic Determinacy Theorem</i>. This theorem says that every subset of Cantor space <span>\\\\(2^\\\\omega \\\\)</span> is, in our constructively meaningful sense, determinate. Kleene’s Alternative is equivalent to a strong negation of a special case of this theorem. We also consider a <i>uniform intermediate value theorem</i> and a <i>compactness theorem for classical propositional logic</i>. The Fan Theorem is equivalent to each of these theorems and Kleene’s Alternative is equivalent to strong negations of them. We end with a note on <i>‘stronger’</i> Fan Theorems. The paper is a sequel to Veldman (Arch Math Logic 53:621–693, 2014).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8350,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archive for Mathematical Logic\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archive for Mathematical Logic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-024-00930-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LOGIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archive for Mathematical Logic","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00153-024-00930-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在被称为 "基本直观数学"(Basic Intuitionistic Mathematics)的弱形式理论的背景下,我们研究了布劳威尔扇形定理(Brouwer's Fan Theorem)和扇形定理的强否定--克莱因替代(扇形定理)。我们证明扇形定理等价于一些直觉上公认的可数选择公理的contrapositions,而Kleene's Alternative等价于这些陈述的强否定。我们讨论了有限博弈和无限博弈,并引入了一个建设性的有用的确定性概念。我们证明了范式定理等同于直觉确定性定理。这个定理说,康托尔空间(2^\omega \)的每一个子集,在我们这个有建构意义的意义上,都是确定的。克莱因替代法等同于对该定理一个特例的强否定。我们还考虑了经典命题逻辑的统一中间值定理和紧凑性定理。扇形定理等价于这些定理,而克莱因替代定理等价于它们的强否定。最后,我们对 "更强 "的范式定理做一个说明。本文是 Veldman(Arch Math Logic 53:621-693, 2014)的续篇。
The Fan Theorem, its strong negation, and the determinacy of games
In the context of a weak formal theory called Basic Intuitionistic Mathematics \(\textsf{BIM}\), we study Brouwer’s Fan Theorem and a strong negation of the Fan Theorem, Kleene’s Alternative (to the Fan Theorem). We prove that the Fan Theorem is equivalent to contrapositions of a number of intuitionistically accepted axioms of countable choice and that Kleene’s Alternative is equivalent to strong negations of these statements. We discuss finite and infinite games and introduce a constructively useful notion of determinacy. We prove that the Fan Theorem is equivalent to the Intuitionistic Determinacy Theorem. This theorem says that every subset of Cantor space \(2^\omega \) is, in our constructively meaningful sense, determinate. Kleene’s Alternative is equivalent to a strong negation of a special case of this theorem. We also consider a uniform intermediate value theorem and a compactness theorem for classical propositional logic. The Fan Theorem is equivalent to each of these theorems and Kleene’s Alternative is equivalent to strong negations of them. We end with a note on ‘stronger’ Fan Theorems. The paper is a sequel to Veldman (Arch Math Logic 53:621–693, 2014).
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes research papers and occasionally surveys or expositions on mathematical logic. Contributions are also welcomed from other related areas, such as theoretical computer science or philosophy, as long as the methods of mathematical logic play a significant role. The journal therefore addresses logicians and mathematicians, computer scientists, and philosophers who are interested in the applications of mathematical logic in their own field, as well as its interactions with other areas of research.