超越对汉语 V 代词 nin 您的尊崇观点

IF 1.1 2区 文学 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Pragmatics Pub Date : 2023-11-16 DOI:10.1075/prag.23008.kad
Dániel Z. Kádár, Juliane House, Hao Liu
{"title":"超越对汉语 V 代词 nin 您的尊崇观点","authors":"Dániel Z. Kádár, Juliane House, Hao Liu","doi":"10.1075/prag.23008.kad","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> In this paper, we revisit the long-held assumption that the Chinese second-person V pronoun <jats:italic>nin</jats:italic> <jats:named-content content-type=\"chinese-text\">您</jats:named-content> is an essentially ‘deferential’ pronoun. We examine uses of <jats:italic>nin</jats:italic> in settings where disagreement occurs and where conventionally the T pronoun <jats:italic>ni</jats:italic> would be preferred. Our research follows a bipartite design. First, we used a Discourse Completion Test to discover under what circumstances Chinese speakers use <jats:italic>nin</jats:italic> if disagreement emerges. The results revealed that uses of <jats:italic>nin</jats:italic> in disagreements are preferred in informal computer-mediated communication and by members of the younger generation. Second, based on this outcome we examined naturally occurring uses of <jats:italic>nin</jats:italic> in online data featuring disagreement. Here we relied on an interactional approach, which helped us to identify patterns of uses of <jats:italic>nin</jats:italic>. The existence of patterns in seemingly <jats:italic>ad hoc</jats:italic> occurrences of online disagreement shows that expressing deference is not the only pragmatic function of <jats:italic>nin</jats:italic>.","PeriodicalId":46975,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the deferential view of the Chinese V pronoun nin 您\",\"authors\":\"Dániel Z. Kádár, Juliane House, Hao Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/prag.23008.kad\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> In this paper, we revisit the long-held assumption that the Chinese second-person V pronoun <jats:italic>nin</jats:italic> <jats:named-content content-type=\\\"chinese-text\\\">您</jats:named-content> is an essentially ‘deferential’ pronoun. We examine uses of <jats:italic>nin</jats:italic> in settings where disagreement occurs and where conventionally the T pronoun <jats:italic>ni</jats:italic> would be preferred. Our research follows a bipartite design. First, we used a Discourse Completion Test to discover under what circumstances Chinese speakers use <jats:italic>nin</jats:italic> if disagreement emerges. The results revealed that uses of <jats:italic>nin</jats:italic> in disagreements are preferred in informal computer-mediated communication and by members of the younger generation. Second, based on this outcome we examined naturally occurring uses of <jats:italic>nin</jats:italic> in online data featuring disagreement. Here we relied on an interactional approach, which helped us to identify patterns of uses of <jats:italic>nin</jats:italic>. The existence of patterns in seemingly <jats:italic>ad hoc</jats:italic> occurrences of online disagreement shows that expressing deference is not the only pragmatic function of <jats:italic>nin</jats:italic>.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46975,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pragmatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23008.kad\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/prag.23008.kad","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要 在本文中,我们重新审视了长期以来的假设,即汉语第二人称 V 代词 nin 您本质上是一个 "尊称 "代词。我们研究了 nin 在出现分歧时的用法,以及在传统上人们更倾向于使用 T 代词 ni 的情况下的用法。我们的研究采用了两部分设计。首先,我们使用了 "话语完成测试",以了解在出现分歧的情况下,中国人在什么情况下会使用 nin。结果表明,在非正式的计算机媒介交际中,年轻一代的人更喜欢在出现分歧时使用 nin。其次,基于这一结果,我们研究了在线数据中自然出现的 "宁 "的使用情况。在这里,我们采用了交互式方法,这有助于我们识别 nin 的使用模式。看似临时出现的在线分歧中存在的模式表明,表达敬意并不是 nin 的唯一语用功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond the deferential view of the Chinese V pronoun nin 您
Abstract In this paper, we revisit the long-held assumption that the Chinese second-person V pronoun nin is an essentially ‘deferential’ pronoun. We examine uses of nin in settings where disagreement occurs and where conventionally the T pronoun ni would be preferred. Our research follows a bipartite design. First, we used a Discourse Completion Test to discover under what circumstances Chinese speakers use nin if disagreement emerges. The results revealed that uses of nin in disagreements are preferred in informal computer-mediated communication and by members of the younger generation. Second, based on this outcome we examined naturally occurring uses of nin in online data featuring disagreement. Here we relied on an interactional approach, which helped us to identify patterns of uses of nin. The existence of patterns in seemingly ad hoc occurrences of online disagreement shows that expressing deference is not the only pragmatic function of nin.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pragmatics
Pragmatics Multiple-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
186
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信