利用双低通滤波器抑制 GRACE/GFO 2 级产品中的条纹噪声

IF 1.4 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
Yong Feng, Yajie Yu, Shubi Zhang, Guobin Chang, Yu Cao, Nijia Qian, Yueyang Huan
{"title":"利用双低通滤波器抑制 GRACE/GFO 2 级产品中的条纹噪声","authors":"Yong Feng, Yajie Yu, Shubi Zhang, Guobin Chang, Yu Cao, Nijia Qian, Yueyang Huan","doi":"10.1007/s40328-024-00448-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The results obtained through GRACE/GRACE Follow-On spherical harmonic coefficient model exhibit noticeable north–south strip noise. While applying low-pass filtering along the latitude circle direction can effectively eliminate the north–south strip error, it unavoidably introduces east–west strip noise. This paper introduces a method that utilizes the cosine function to determine the cutoff frequency for the low-pass filtering in the latitude direction. Additionally, a low-pass filtering step is added in the meridian circle direction. This combined approach successfully mitigates the north–south strip error and simultaneously suppresses the east–west strip noise. The analysis results highlight the improvement in signal to noise ratio of global surface quality anomaly estimation achieved by utilizing the cosine function to determine the cutoff frequency. The use of data from five institutions reveals that the dual low-pass filtering (DLP) improves the signal to noise ratio by more than 2% compared to the traditional efficient low-pass-filtering (ELP). When analyzing the uncertainty in the Yangtze River Basin using the three-cornered hat method, it is observed that the uncertainties of the DLP solution, traditional ELP solution, and mascon solution are comparable. Furthermore, the DLP solution exhibits the smallest uncertainty, measured at 4.89 cm. In terms of root mean square error, the DLP almost consistently yields the lowest values across various regions, with the difference from the smallest root mean square error value remaining within 2 mm in certain regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48965,"journal":{"name":"Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Suppressing stripe noise in GRACE/GFO level-2 products with dual low-pass filtering\",\"authors\":\"Yong Feng, Yajie Yu, Shubi Zhang, Guobin Chang, Yu Cao, Nijia Qian, Yueyang Huan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40328-024-00448-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The results obtained through GRACE/GRACE Follow-On spherical harmonic coefficient model exhibit noticeable north–south strip noise. While applying low-pass filtering along the latitude circle direction can effectively eliminate the north–south strip error, it unavoidably introduces east–west strip noise. This paper introduces a method that utilizes the cosine function to determine the cutoff frequency for the low-pass filtering in the latitude direction. Additionally, a low-pass filtering step is added in the meridian circle direction. This combined approach successfully mitigates the north–south strip error and simultaneously suppresses the east–west strip noise. The analysis results highlight the improvement in signal to noise ratio of global surface quality anomaly estimation achieved by utilizing the cosine function to determine the cutoff frequency. The use of data from five institutions reveals that the dual low-pass filtering (DLP) improves the signal to noise ratio by more than 2% compared to the traditional efficient low-pass-filtering (ELP). When analyzing the uncertainty in the Yangtze River Basin using the three-cornered hat method, it is observed that the uncertainties of the DLP solution, traditional ELP solution, and mascon solution are comparable. Furthermore, the DLP solution exhibits the smallest uncertainty, measured at 4.89 cm. In terms of root mean square error, the DLP almost consistently yields the lowest values across various regions, with the difference from the smallest root mean square error value remaining within 2 mm in certain regions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-024-00448-9\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40328-024-00448-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

通过 GRACE/GRACE Follow-On 球谐波系数模型获得的结果显示出明显的南北向条带噪声。虽然沿纬度圆方向应用低通滤波可以有效消除南北向条带误差,但不可避免地会引入东西向条带噪声。本文介绍了一种利用余弦函数确定纬度方向低通滤波截止频率的方法。此外,还在子午圈方向增加了一个低通滤波步骤。这种组合方法成功地减轻了南北向条带误差,同时抑制了东西向条带噪声。分析结果凸显了利用余弦函数确定截止频率所实现的全球地表质量异常估计信噪比的改善。利用五个机构的数据发现,与传统的高效低通滤波器(ELP)相比,双低通滤波器(DLP)的信噪比提高了 2% 以上。使用三角帽法分析长江流域的不确定性时,发现 DLP 解法、传统 ELP 解法和 mascon 解法的不确定性相当。此外,DLP 解法的不确定性最小,为 4.89 厘米。就均方根误差而言,DLP 在不同区域几乎都能获得最低值,在某些区域,与最小均方根误差值的差距保持在 2 毫米以内。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Suppressing stripe noise in GRACE/GFO level-2 products with dual low-pass filtering

Suppressing stripe noise in GRACE/GFO level-2 products with dual low-pass filtering

The results obtained through GRACE/GRACE Follow-On spherical harmonic coefficient model exhibit noticeable north–south strip noise. While applying low-pass filtering along the latitude circle direction can effectively eliminate the north–south strip error, it unavoidably introduces east–west strip noise. This paper introduces a method that utilizes the cosine function to determine the cutoff frequency for the low-pass filtering in the latitude direction. Additionally, a low-pass filtering step is added in the meridian circle direction. This combined approach successfully mitigates the north–south strip error and simultaneously suppresses the east–west strip noise. The analysis results highlight the improvement in signal to noise ratio of global surface quality anomaly estimation achieved by utilizing the cosine function to determine the cutoff frequency. The use of data from five institutions reveals that the dual low-pass filtering (DLP) improves the signal to noise ratio by more than 2% compared to the traditional efficient low-pass-filtering (ELP). When analyzing the uncertainty in the Yangtze River Basin using the three-cornered hat method, it is observed that the uncertainties of the DLP solution, traditional ELP solution, and mascon solution are comparable. Furthermore, the DLP solution exhibits the smallest uncertainty, measured at 4.89 cm. In terms of root mean square error, the DLP almost consistently yields the lowest values across various regions, with the difference from the smallest root mean square error value remaining within 2 mm in certain regions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica
Acta Geodaetica et Geophysica GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research papers in the field of geodesy and geophysics under headings: aeronomy and space physics, electromagnetic studies, geodesy and gravimetry, geodynamics, geomathematics, rock physics, seismology, solid earth physics, history. Papers dealing with problems of the Carpathian region and its surroundings are preferred. Similarly, papers on topics traditionally covered by Hungarian geodesists and geophysicists (e.g. robust estimations, geoid, EM properties of the Earth’s crust, geomagnetic pulsations and seismological risk) are especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信