环境、社会和治理挑战如何影响违约风险?从全球银行业的角度进行实证分析

IF 2.3 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Zbigniew Korzeb, Renata Karkowska, Anna Matysek-Jędrych, Paweł Niedziółka
{"title":"环境、社会和治理挑战如何影响违约风险?从全球银行业的角度进行实证分析","authors":"Zbigniew Korzeb, Renata Karkowska, Anna Matysek-Jędrych, Paweł Niedziółka","doi":"10.1108/sef-09-2023-0540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>A review of the literature provides a solid reason to believe that an increase in environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) activities have a positive impact on banks’ default risk (DR). However, the increasing impact of climate risk on credit, operational and market risks, as well as the reduced availability of funding for banks that underperform in terms of ESG risk, is a concern. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to verify the relevance of the implementation of ESG policies to a bank’s DR, against the background of macroeconomic and bank-specific factors.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Using a data set of 303 commercial banks from 61 countries from 2012 to 2021 and a panel regression methodology, the empirical importance of ESG activities for bank DR is documented. The two-stage generalized method of moments estimator was used to test the research questions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Comparing different factors, the results highlight the positive impact of ESG activities on the bank’s DR. However, this relationship varies according to the specific pillars of the bank’s sustainability policies and changes into negative ones.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper fits the domain of DR management research, investigating whether ESG performance affects bank DR while controlling macroeconomic and market drivers. Prior literature has shown evidence on the relationship between macro and market forces and a bank’s risk profile while a limited one on the non-market drivers. The main contribution is to consider ESG (in total and as separate pillars) as independent drivers of the bank risk profile.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":45607,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Economics and Finance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do ESG challenges affect default risk? An empirical analysis from the global banking sector perspective\",\"authors\":\"Zbigniew Korzeb, Renata Karkowska, Anna Matysek-Jędrych, Paweł Niedziółka\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/sef-09-2023-0540\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>A review of the literature provides a solid reason to believe that an increase in environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) activities have a positive impact on banks’ default risk (DR). However, the increasing impact of climate risk on credit, operational and market risks, as well as the reduced availability of funding for banks that underperform in terms of ESG risk, is a concern. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to verify the relevance of the implementation of ESG policies to a bank’s DR, against the background of macroeconomic and bank-specific factors.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>Using a data set of 303 commercial banks from 61 countries from 2012 to 2021 and a panel regression methodology, the empirical importance of ESG activities for bank DR is documented. The two-stage generalized method of moments estimator was used to test the research questions.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Comparing different factors, the results highlight the positive impact of ESG activities on the bank’s DR. However, this relationship varies according to the specific pillars of the bank’s sustainability policies and changes into negative ones.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This paper fits the domain of DR management research, investigating whether ESG performance affects bank DR while controlling macroeconomic and market drivers. Prior literature has shown evidence on the relationship between macro and market forces and a bank’s risk profile while a limited one on the non-market drivers. The main contribution is to consider ESG (in total and as separate pillars) as independent drivers of the bank risk profile.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":45607,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studies in Economics and Finance\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studies in Economics and Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/sef-09-2023-0540\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Economics and Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sef-09-2023-0540","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 通过对文献的回顾,我们有充分的理由相信,环境、社会和公司治理(ESG)活动的增加会对银行的违约风险(DR)产生积极影响。然而,气候风险对信用风险、经营风险和市场风险的影响越来越大,而且在环境、社会和公司治理风险方面表现不佳的银行所能获得的资金也会减少,这一点令人担忧。因此,本研究的目的是在宏观经济和银行特定因素的背景下,验证 ESG 政策的实施与银行 DR 的相关性。设计/方法/途径利用 2012 年至 2021 年 61 个国家 303 家商业银行的数据集和面板回归方法,记录 ESG 活动对银行 DR 的经验重要性。研究结果比较了不同的因素,结果凸显了环境、社会和治理活动对银行灾难恢复能力的积极影响。然而,这种关系因银行可持续发展政策的具体支柱而异,并转化为负面关系。先前的文献已经证明了宏观和市场力量与银行风险状况之间的关系,但对非市场驱动因素的研究却很有限。本文的主要贡献在于将环境、社会和公司治理(总体和单独的支柱)视为银行风险状况的独立驱动因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How do ESG challenges affect default risk? An empirical analysis from the global banking sector perspective

Purpose

A review of the literature provides a solid reason to believe that an increase in environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) activities have a positive impact on banks’ default risk (DR). However, the increasing impact of climate risk on credit, operational and market risks, as well as the reduced availability of funding for banks that underperform in terms of ESG risk, is a concern. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to verify the relevance of the implementation of ESG policies to a bank’s DR, against the background of macroeconomic and bank-specific factors.

Design/methodology/approach

Using a data set of 303 commercial banks from 61 countries from 2012 to 2021 and a panel regression methodology, the empirical importance of ESG activities for bank DR is documented. The two-stage generalized method of moments estimator was used to test the research questions.

Findings

Comparing different factors, the results highlight the positive impact of ESG activities on the bank’s DR. However, this relationship varies according to the specific pillars of the bank’s sustainability policies and changes into negative ones.

Originality/value

This paper fits the domain of DR management research, investigating whether ESG performance affects bank DR while controlling macroeconomic and market drivers. Prior literature has shown evidence on the relationship between macro and market forces and a bank’s risk profile while a limited one on the non-market drivers. The main contribution is to consider ESG (in total and as separate pillars) as independent drivers of the bank risk profile.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
10.50%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: Topics addressed in the journal include: ■corporate finance, ■financial markets, ■money and banking, ■international finance and economics, ■investments, ■risk management, ■theory of the firm, ■competition policy, ■corporate governance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信