{"title":"基于深度学习的月球环形山自动探测综述","authors":"Chinmayee Chaini, Vijay Kumar Jha","doi":"10.1007/s12145-024-01396-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The lunar surface, which has been extensively explored and studied, offers valuable insights into its geological history and crater distribution due to the abundance of impact craters on its surface. Detecting numerous craters of different sizes on the lunar surface necessitated an automated process to avoid manual intervention, which consumed significant time and effort. However, traditional methods rely on manual feature extraction methods, encountering similar challenges, including low performance, particularly when confronted with diverse crater sizes and illumination conditions. In recent years, intelligent algorithms that introduce automated crater detection algorithms (CDAs) using deep learning (DL) techniques have played a vital role in detecting various sizes of craters on the lunar surface that may be missed or miss-classification by visual interpretation. This study outlines the challenges faced by traditional methods and explores recent advancements in DL techniques. The main objective is to provide a comprehensive review of prior studies, highlighting the advantages and limitations of each DL-based technique for automatic crater detection. Additionally, this study aggregates existing research on various image-processing tasks (such as semantic segmentation, classification-based, and object detection) utilizing DL-based techniques for detecting various sizes of craters on the lunar surface. Further, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of both manually and automatically compiled crater databases to assist new researchers in validating their models both qualitatively and quantitatively. By reviewing existing literature, this study aids new researchers in understanding the limitations and key findings of recent research, thereby promoting progress toward greater automation in crater detection.</p>","PeriodicalId":49318,"journal":{"name":"Earth Science Informatics","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A review on deep learning-based automated lunar crater detection\",\"authors\":\"Chinmayee Chaini, Vijay Kumar Jha\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12145-024-01396-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The lunar surface, which has been extensively explored and studied, offers valuable insights into its geological history and crater distribution due to the abundance of impact craters on its surface. Detecting numerous craters of different sizes on the lunar surface necessitated an automated process to avoid manual intervention, which consumed significant time and effort. However, traditional methods rely on manual feature extraction methods, encountering similar challenges, including low performance, particularly when confronted with diverse crater sizes and illumination conditions. In recent years, intelligent algorithms that introduce automated crater detection algorithms (CDAs) using deep learning (DL) techniques have played a vital role in detecting various sizes of craters on the lunar surface that may be missed or miss-classification by visual interpretation. This study outlines the challenges faced by traditional methods and explores recent advancements in DL techniques. The main objective is to provide a comprehensive review of prior studies, highlighting the advantages and limitations of each DL-based technique for automatic crater detection. Additionally, this study aggregates existing research on various image-processing tasks (such as semantic segmentation, classification-based, and object detection) utilizing DL-based techniques for detecting various sizes of craters on the lunar surface. Further, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of both manually and automatically compiled crater databases to assist new researchers in validating their models both qualitatively and quantitatively. By reviewing existing literature, this study aids new researchers in understanding the limitations and key findings of recent research, thereby promoting progress toward greater automation in crater detection.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth Science Informatics\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth Science Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-024-01396-2\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Science Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-024-01396-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A review on deep learning-based automated lunar crater detection
The lunar surface, which has been extensively explored and studied, offers valuable insights into its geological history and crater distribution due to the abundance of impact craters on its surface. Detecting numerous craters of different sizes on the lunar surface necessitated an automated process to avoid manual intervention, which consumed significant time and effort. However, traditional methods rely on manual feature extraction methods, encountering similar challenges, including low performance, particularly when confronted with diverse crater sizes and illumination conditions. In recent years, intelligent algorithms that introduce automated crater detection algorithms (CDAs) using deep learning (DL) techniques have played a vital role in detecting various sizes of craters on the lunar surface that may be missed or miss-classification by visual interpretation. This study outlines the challenges faced by traditional methods and explores recent advancements in DL techniques. The main objective is to provide a comprehensive review of prior studies, highlighting the advantages and limitations of each DL-based technique for automatic crater detection. Additionally, this study aggregates existing research on various image-processing tasks (such as semantic segmentation, classification-based, and object detection) utilizing DL-based techniques for detecting various sizes of craters on the lunar surface. Further, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of both manually and automatically compiled crater databases to assist new researchers in validating their models both qualitatively and quantitatively. By reviewing existing literature, this study aids new researchers in understanding the limitations and key findings of recent research, thereby promoting progress toward greater automation in crater detection.
期刊介绍:
The Earth Science Informatics [ESIN] journal aims at rapid publication of high-quality, current, cutting-edge, and provocative scientific work in the area of Earth Science Informatics as it relates to Earth systems science and space science. This includes articles on the application of formal and computational methods, computational Earth science, spatial and temporal analyses, and all aspects of computer applications to the acquisition, storage, processing, interchange, and visualization of data and information about the materials, properties, processes, features, and phenomena that occur at all scales and locations in the Earth system’s five components (atmosphere, hydrosphere, geosphere, biosphere, cryosphere) and in space (see "About this journal" for more detail). The quarterly journal publishes research, methodology, and software articles, as well as editorials, comments, and book and software reviews. Review articles of relevant findings, topics, and methodologies are also considered.