尼泊尔残疾人获得和利用性健康和生殖健康服务的情况

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 REHABILITATION
Devendra Raj Singh, Samita K.C, Dev Ram Sunuwar, Sarina Shrestha, Rajeeb Kumar Sah, Sushmita Ghimire, Dan Bahadur Khadka, Lalita Kumari Sah, Jennifer Mathias Shah, Kshitij Karki
{"title":"尼泊尔残疾人获得和利用性健康和生殖健康服务的情况","authors":"Devendra Raj Singh, Samita K.C, Dev Ram Sunuwar, Sarina Shrestha, Rajeeb Kumar Sah, Sushmita Ghimire, Dan Bahadur Khadka, Lalita Kumari Sah, Jennifer Mathias Shah, Kshitij Karki","doi":"10.1007/s11195-024-09861-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The study aims to assess the factors determining the access and utilization of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services among people with disabilities residing in the Kathmandu Valley of Nepal. A cross-sectional study was conducted among randomly selected 422 people with disabilities in Kathmandu Valley. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using structured questionnaires. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted. Among a total of 422 participants, 32.7% had utilized SRH-related education, information, and counselling services. Contraceptive-related services were utilized by 47.6% of participants, pregnancy-related services by 27.7%, safe abortion-related services by 13.0%, and HIV testing and treatment services by 3.6%. Likewise, 16.8% of participants utilized STI screening, diagnosis, and management services. Males were 2.5 times more likely to utilize SRH services compared to females (AOR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.4-4.2), whereas unmarried participants were less likely to utilize SRH services as compared to single/separated/divorced (AOR = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.0-0.5). Similarly, participants who were living with their families compared to those living alone (AOR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.4-7.7), and participants who were unemployed compared to employed (AOR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.0-3.5) had higher odds for utilization of SRH services. There are significant variations depending on the intersections of various characteristics affecting the utilization rate across different SRH services among people with disabilities. Contraceptive-related services were the most utilized service, whereas safe abortion, pregnancy related services, STI screening and management services and HIV testing and treatment services were less utilized services.</p>","PeriodicalId":51537,"journal":{"name":"Sexuality and Disability","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accessibility and Utilization of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services among People with Disabilities in Nepal\",\"authors\":\"Devendra Raj Singh, Samita K.C, Dev Ram Sunuwar, Sarina Shrestha, Rajeeb Kumar Sah, Sushmita Ghimire, Dan Bahadur Khadka, Lalita Kumari Sah, Jennifer Mathias Shah, Kshitij Karki\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11195-024-09861-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The study aims to assess the factors determining the access and utilization of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services among people with disabilities residing in the Kathmandu Valley of Nepal. A cross-sectional study was conducted among randomly selected 422 people with disabilities in Kathmandu Valley. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using structured questionnaires. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted. Among a total of 422 participants, 32.7% had utilized SRH-related education, information, and counselling services. Contraceptive-related services were utilized by 47.6% of participants, pregnancy-related services by 27.7%, safe abortion-related services by 13.0%, and HIV testing and treatment services by 3.6%. Likewise, 16.8% of participants utilized STI screening, diagnosis, and management services. Males were 2.5 times more likely to utilize SRH services compared to females (AOR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.4-4.2), whereas unmarried participants were less likely to utilize SRH services as compared to single/separated/divorced (AOR = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.0-0.5). Similarly, participants who were living with their families compared to those living alone (AOR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.4-7.7), and participants who were unemployed compared to employed (AOR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.0-3.5) had higher odds for utilization of SRH services. There are significant variations depending on the intersections of various characteristics affecting the utilization rate across different SRH services among people with disabilities. Contraceptive-related services were the most utilized service, whereas safe abortion, pregnancy related services, STI screening and management services and HIV testing and treatment services were less utilized services.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sexuality and Disability\",\"volume\":\"65 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sexuality and Disability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-024-09861-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"REHABILITATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexuality and Disability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-024-09861-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在评估决定居住在尼泊尔加德满都谷地的残疾人获得和利用性与生殖健康(SRH)服务的因素。研究在加德满都谷地随机抽取的 422 名残疾人中进行了横断面研究。数据通过结构化问卷进行面对面访谈收集。研究进行了二元和多元逻辑回归分析。在总共 422 名参与者中,32.7% 的人使用过与性健康和生殖健康相关的教育、信息和咨询服务。47.6%的参与者使用过避孕相关服务,27.7%的参与者使用过怀孕相关服务,13.0%的参与者使用过安全堕胎相关服务,3.6%的参与者使用过艾滋病检测和治疗服务。同样,16.8% 的参与者使用了性传播感染筛查、诊断和管理服务。男性利用性健康和生殖健康服务的可能性是女性的 2.5 倍(AOR = 2.5,95% CI = 1.4-4.2),而未婚参与者利用性健康和生殖健康服务的可能性低于单身/分居/离异者(AOR = 0.2,95% CI = 0.0-0.5)。同样,与家人同住的参与者比独居者(AOR = 3.4,95% CI = 1.4-7.7)和失业的参与者比就业者(AOR = 1.8,95% CI = 1.0-3.5)利用性健康和生殖健康服务的几率更高。影响残疾人性健康和生殖健康服务使用率的各种特征的交叉点存在明显差异。避孕相关服务是使用率最高的服务,而安全堕胎、怀孕相关服务、性传播感染筛查和管理服务以及艾滋病毒检测和治疗服务则是使用率较低的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Accessibility and Utilization of Sexual and Reproductive Health Services among People with Disabilities in Nepal

The study aims to assess the factors determining the access and utilization of sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services among people with disabilities residing in the Kathmandu Valley of Nepal. A cross-sectional study was conducted among randomly selected 422 people with disabilities in Kathmandu Valley. Data were collected through face-to-face interviews using structured questionnaires. Bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted. Among a total of 422 participants, 32.7% had utilized SRH-related education, information, and counselling services. Contraceptive-related services were utilized by 47.6% of participants, pregnancy-related services by 27.7%, safe abortion-related services by 13.0%, and HIV testing and treatment services by 3.6%. Likewise, 16.8% of participants utilized STI screening, diagnosis, and management services. Males were 2.5 times more likely to utilize SRH services compared to females (AOR = 2.5, 95% CI = 1.4-4.2), whereas unmarried participants were less likely to utilize SRH services as compared to single/separated/divorced (AOR = 0.2, 95% CI = 0.0-0.5). Similarly, participants who were living with their families compared to those living alone (AOR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.4-7.7), and participants who were unemployed compared to employed (AOR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.0-3.5) had higher odds for utilization of SRH services. There are significant variations depending on the intersections of various characteristics affecting the utilization rate across different SRH services among people with disabilities. Contraceptive-related services were the most utilized service, whereas safe abortion, pregnancy related services, STI screening and management services and HIV testing and treatment services were less utilized services.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sexuality and Disability
Sexuality and Disability REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Sexuality and Disability is an international forum for the publication of peer-reviewed original interdisciplinary scholarly papers that address the psychological and medical aspects of sexuality in relation to rehabilitation. Publishing timely research articles, review articles, case studies, clinical practice reports, brief research reports, survey data reports, and book and film reviews, the journal offers the latest developments in the area of sexuality as it relates to a wide range of disabilities and conditions. Contributions address: clinical and research progress; community programs; independent-living programs; guidelines for clinical practice; special grand-rounds topics; consumer issues; and contemporary developments in special programs in sex education and counseling for people with disabilities. The journal features special issues with internationally renowned guest editors focusing on current topics in sexual health. By publishing research, best-practice, evidence-based, and educational articles, the journal seeks to contribute to the field''s knowledge base and advancement. Sexuality and Disability is an essential resource for the exchange of new knowledge, issues, techniques, and available modalities for researchers and other professionals addressing the psychological and medical aspects of sexuality in rehabilitation, medical, academic, and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信