Pembrolizumab、Ipilimumab 和 Nivolumab 单药及联合用药治疗结直肠癌的有效性和安全性:系统回顾与元分析

Albertus Ari Adrianto, Ignatius Riwanto, Udadi Sadhana, Dewi Kartikawati Paramita, Henry Setyawan, Kevin Christian Tjandra, Danendra Rakha Putra Respati, Derren David Christian Homenta Rampengan, Roy Novri Ramadhan, Gastin Gabriel Jangkang, Endang Mahati
{"title":"Pembrolizumab、Ipilimumab 和 Nivolumab 单药及联合用药治疗结直肠癌的有效性和安全性:系统回顾与元分析","authors":"Albertus Ari Adrianto, Ignatius Riwanto, Udadi Sadhana, Dewi Kartikawati Paramita, Henry Setyawan, Kevin Christian Tjandra, Danendra Rakha Putra Respati, Derren David Christian Homenta Rampengan, Roy Novri Ramadhan, Gastin Gabriel Jangkang, Endang Mahati","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.02.24309865","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks third globally in cancer-related mortality, with rising incidence, particularly in Asia, projecting a 60% surge by 2030. Metastatic CRC (mCRC) presents a significant challenge with a grim 5-year survival rate of 14%. Emerging evidence suggests that tumors with DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) and high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) respond well to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), marking a paradigm shift in therapeutic approaches. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to comprehensively assess Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab, and the combination of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in advanced CRC, considering their significant antitumor efficacy in MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines and Cochrane Handbook standards, this study covers 2014 to 2024, involving advanced CRC patients treated with ICIs. A comprehensive literature search employed 12 independent authors across eight databases. Parameters such as overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate were extracted. The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias version 2 tool assessed risk. Statistical analysis utilized mean difference and risk ratios with random-effect models due to anticipated heterogeneity. Robustness was ensured through publication bias analysis and sensitivity meta-analysis. Linear regression explored associations in subgroup analysis. Results The meta-analysis evaluated ORR and OS across different immunotherapy interventions. Nivolumab, Nivolumab+Ipilimumab, and Pembrolizumab exhibited varying ORR and OS effect sizes with corresponding heterogeneity levels. Progression-free survival (PFS) analysis also showed diverse effect sizes and heterogeneity levels across the three interventions. The study provides a comprehensive overview of response rates and survival outcomes for these immunotherapies in advanced CRC. Conclusions The study concludes that combination immunotherapy, particularly Nivolumab and Ipilimumab, presents a promising avenue for advanced CRC treatment, showing superior efficacy. Pembrolizumab monotherapy also exhibited promise. While the study offers valuable insights, the identified heterogeneity emphasizes the need for additional research. Adverse effects were generally low, supporting the viability of the studied immunotherapies. The study acknowledges limitations and calls for ongoing investigation to refine and validate these findings, marking a pioneering effort in systematically comparing short-term and long-term effects of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 therapies in CRC.","PeriodicalId":501051,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab, Ipilimumab, and Nivolumab Monoteraphy and Combination for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Albertus Ari Adrianto, Ignatius Riwanto, Udadi Sadhana, Dewi Kartikawati Paramita, Henry Setyawan, Kevin Christian Tjandra, Danendra Rakha Putra Respati, Derren David Christian Homenta Rampengan, Roy Novri Ramadhan, Gastin Gabriel Jangkang, Endang Mahati\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.07.02.24309865\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks third globally in cancer-related mortality, with rising incidence, particularly in Asia, projecting a 60% surge by 2030. Metastatic CRC (mCRC) presents a significant challenge with a grim 5-year survival rate of 14%. Emerging evidence suggests that tumors with DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) and high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) respond well to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), marking a paradigm shift in therapeutic approaches. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to comprehensively assess Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab, and the combination of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in advanced CRC, considering their significant antitumor efficacy in MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines and Cochrane Handbook standards, this study covers 2014 to 2024, involving advanced CRC patients treated with ICIs. A comprehensive literature search employed 12 independent authors across eight databases. Parameters such as overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate were extracted. The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias version 2 tool assessed risk. Statistical analysis utilized mean difference and risk ratios with random-effect models due to anticipated heterogeneity. Robustness was ensured through publication bias analysis and sensitivity meta-analysis. Linear regression explored associations in subgroup analysis. Results The meta-analysis evaluated ORR and OS across different immunotherapy interventions. Nivolumab, Nivolumab+Ipilimumab, and Pembrolizumab exhibited varying ORR and OS effect sizes with corresponding heterogeneity levels. Progression-free survival (PFS) analysis also showed diverse effect sizes and heterogeneity levels across the three interventions. The study provides a comprehensive overview of response rates and survival outcomes for these immunotherapies in advanced CRC. Conclusions The study concludes that combination immunotherapy, particularly Nivolumab and Ipilimumab, presents a promising avenue for advanced CRC treatment, showing superior efficacy. Pembrolizumab monotherapy also exhibited promise. While the study offers valuable insights, the identified heterogeneity emphasizes the need for additional research. Adverse effects were generally low, supporting the viability of the studied immunotherapies. The study acknowledges limitations and calls for ongoing investigation to refine and validate these findings, marking a pioneering effort in systematically comparing short-term and long-term effects of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 therapies in CRC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501051,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Surgery\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.02.24309865\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.02.24309865","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 大肠癌(CRC)在全球癌症相关死亡率中排名第三,发病率不断上升,尤其是在亚洲,预计到 2030 年将激增 60%。转移性 CRC(mCRC)是一项严峻的挑战,其 5 年生存率仅为 14%。新的证据表明,DNA错配修复缺陷(dMMR)和高微卫星不稳定性(MSI-H)的肿瘤对免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)反应良好,标志着治疗方法的范式转变。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在全面评估 Pembrolizumab、Nivolumab 以及 Nivolumab 和 Ipilimumab 联合治疗晚期 CRC 的疗效,同时考虑到它们在 MSI-H/dMMR mCRC 中的显著抗肿瘤疗效。方法 按照 PRISMA 指南和 Cochrane 手册标准,本研究涵盖了 2014 年至 2024 年使用 ICIs 治疗的晚期 CRC 患者。12位独立作者在8个数据库中进行了全面的文献检索。提取了总生存期、无进展生存期和客观反应率等参数。Cochrane 协作组织的第 2 版偏倚风险工具对风险进行了评估。由于预期存在异质性,统计分析采用了随机效应模型的平均差和风险比。通过发表偏倚分析和敏感性荟萃分析确保了稳健性。线性回归探讨了亚组分析中的相关性。结果 该荟萃分析评估了不同免疫疗法干预的ORR和OS。Nivolumab、Nivolumab+Ipilimumab和Pembrolizumab的ORR和OS效应大小不同,异质性也相应不同。无进展生存期(PFS)分析也显示了三种干预措施的不同效应大小和异质性水平。该研究全面概述了这些免疫疗法在晚期 CRC 中的应答率和生存结果。结论 该研究认为,联合免疫疗法,尤其是 Nivolumab 和 Ipilimumab,为晚期 CRC 治疗提供了一条前景广阔的途径,显示出卓越的疗效。Pembrolizumab单药疗法也很有前景。虽然这项研究提供了有价值的见解,但发现的异质性强调了进行更多研究的必要性。不良反应普遍较低,支持了所研究的免疫疗法的可行性。该研究承认存在局限性,并呼吁继续开展调查以完善和验证这些发现,这标志着在系统比较抗CTLA-4和抗PD-1疗法对CRC的短期和长期疗效方面做出了开创性的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Efficacy and Safety of Pembrolizumab, Ipilimumab, and Nivolumab Monoteraphy and Combination for Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks third globally in cancer-related mortality, with rising incidence, particularly in Asia, projecting a 60% surge by 2030. Metastatic CRC (mCRC) presents a significant challenge with a grim 5-year survival rate of 14%. Emerging evidence suggests that tumors with DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) and high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) respond well to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), marking a paradigm shift in therapeutic approaches. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to comprehensively assess Pembrolizumab, Nivolumab, and the combination of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab in advanced CRC, considering their significant antitumor efficacy in MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Methods Following PRISMA guidelines and Cochrane Handbook standards, this study covers 2014 to 2024, involving advanced CRC patients treated with ICIs. A comprehensive literature search employed 12 independent authors across eight databases. Parameters such as overall survival, progression-free survival, and objective response rate were extracted. The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias version 2 tool assessed risk. Statistical analysis utilized mean difference and risk ratios with random-effect models due to anticipated heterogeneity. Robustness was ensured through publication bias analysis and sensitivity meta-analysis. Linear regression explored associations in subgroup analysis. Results The meta-analysis evaluated ORR and OS across different immunotherapy interventions. Nivolumab, Nivolumab+Ipilimumab, and Pembrolizumab exhibited varying ORR and OS effect sizes with corresponding heterogeneity levels. Progression-free survival (PFS) analysis also showed diverse effect sizes and heterogeneity levels across the three interventions. The study provides a comprehensive overview of response rates and survival outcomes for these immunotherapies in advanced CRC. Conclusions The study concludes that combination immunotherapy, particularly Nivolumab and Ipilimumab, presents a promising avenue for advanced CRC treatment, showing superior efficacy. Pembrolizumab monotherapy also exhibited promise. While the study offers valuable insights, the identified heterogeneity emphasizes the need for additional research. Adverse effects were generally low, supporting the viability of the studied immunotherapies. The study acknowledges limitations and calls for ongoing investigation to refine and validate these findings, marking a pioneering effort in systematically comparing short-term and long-term effects of anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 therapies in CRC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信