基本直观条件逻辑的直观完备系统

IF 0.7 1区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Grigory Olkhovikov
{"title":"基本直观条件逻辑的直观完备系统","authors":"Grigory Olkhovikov","doi":"10.1007/s10992-024-09763-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We introduce a basic intuitionistic conditional logic <span>\\(\\textsf{IntCK}\\)</span> that we show to be complete both relative to a special type of Kripke models and relative to a standard translation into first-order intuitionistic logic. We show that <span>\\(\\textsf{IntCK}\\)</span> stands in a very natural relation to other similar logics, like the basic classical conditional logic <span>\\(\\textsf{CK}\\)</span> and the basic intuitionistic modal logic <span>\\(\\textsf{IK}\\)</span>. As for the basic intuitionistic conditional logic <span>\\(\\textsf{ICK}\\)</span> proposed in Weiss (<i>Journal of Philosophical Logic</i>, <i>48</i>, 447–469, 2019), <span>\\(\\textsf{IntCK}\\)</span> extends its language with a diamond-like conditional modality <span>\\(\\Diamond \\hspace{-4.0pt}\\rightarrow \\)</span>, but its (<span>\\(\\Diamond \\hspace{-4.0pt}\\rightarrow \\)</span>)-free fragment is also a proper extension of <span>\\(\\textsf{ICK}\\)</span>. We briefly discuss the resulting gap between the two candidate systems of basic intuitionistic conditional logic and the possible pros and cons of both candidates.</p>","PeriodicalId":51526,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Intuitionistically Complete System of Basic Intuitionistic Conditional Logic\",\"authors\":\"Grigory Olkhovikov\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10992-024-09763-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We introduce a basic intuitionistic conditional logic <span>\\\\(\\\\textsf{IntCK}\\\\)</span> that we show to be complete both relative to a special type of Kripke models and relative to a standard translation into first-order intuitionistic logic. We show that <span>\\\\(\\\\textsf{IntCK}\\\\)</span> stands in a very natural relation to other similar logics, like the basic classical conditional logic <span>\\\\(\\\\textsf{CK}\\\\)</span> and the basic intuitionistic modal logic <span>\\\\(\\\\textsf{IK}\\\\)</span>. As for the basic intuitionistic conditional logic <span>\\\\(\\\\textsf{ICK}\\\\)</span> proposed in Weiss (<i>Journal of Philosophical Logic</i>, <i>48</i>, 447–469, 2019), <span>\\\\(\\\\textsf{IntCK}\\\\)</span> extends its language with a diamond-like conditional modality <span>\\\\(\\\\Diamond \\\\hspace{-4.0pt}\\\\rightarrow \\\\)</span>, but its (<span>\\\\(\\\\Diamond \\\\hspace{-4.0pt}\\\\rightarrow \\\\)</span>)-free fragment is also a proper extension of <span>\\\\(\\\\textsf{ICK}\\\\)</span>. We briefly discuss the resulting gap between the two candidate systems of basic intuitionistic conditional logic and the possible pros and cons of both candidates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-024-09763-6\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHICAL LOGIC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-024-09763-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们引入了一个基本的直觉主义条件逻辑(\textsf{IntCK}\),我们证明它相对于一种特殊类型的克里普克模型和相对于一阶直觉主义逻辑的标准翻译都是完备的。我们证明\(\textsf{IntCK}\)与其他类似逻辑有着非常自然的关系,比如基本经典条件逻辑\(\textsf{CK}\)和基本直观模态逻辑\(\textsf{IK}\)。至于魏斯(Weiss)在《哲学逻辑学杂志》(Journal of Philosophical Logic, 48, 447-469, 2019)中提出的基本直觉主义条件逻辑(basic intuitionistic conditional logic),(\textsf{IntCK}\)用钻石般的条件模态(diamond-like conditional modality)扩展了它的语言。0pt}\rightarrow),但是它的(\(\Diamond \hspace{-4.0pt}\rightarrow \))自由片段也是\(\textsf{ICTK}\)的适当扩展。我们将简要讨论基本直觉条件逻辑的两个候选系统之间的差距,以及这两个候选系统可能存在的利弊。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Intuitionistically Complete System of Basic Intuitionistic Conditional Logic

We introduce a basic intuitionistic conditional logic \(\textsf{IntCK}\) that we show to be complete both relative to a special type of Kripke models and relative to a standard translation into first-order intuitionistic logic. We show that \(\textsf{IntCK}\) stands in a very natural relation to other similar logics, like the basic classical conditional logic \(\textsf{CK}\) and the basic intuitionistic modal logic \(\textsf{IK}\). As for the basic intuitionistic conditional logic \(\textsf{ICK}\) proposed in Weiss (Journal of Philosophical Logic, 48, 447–469, 2019), \(\textsf{IntCK}\) extends its language with a diamond-like conditional modality \(\Diamond \hspace{-4.0pt}\rightarrow \), but its (\(\Diamond \hspace{-4.0pt}\rightarrow \))-free fragment is also a proper extension of \(\textsf{ICK}\). We briefly discuss the resulting gap between the two candidate systems of basic intuitionistic conditional logic and the possible pros and cons of both candidates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The Journal of Philosophical Logic aims to provide a forum for work at the crossroads of philosophy and logic, old and new, with contributions ranging from conceptual to technical.  Accordingly, the Journal invites papers in all of the traditional areas of philosophical logic, including but not limited to: various versions of modal, temporal, epistemic, and deontic logic; constructive logics; relevance and other sub-classical logics; many-valued logics; logics of conditionals; quantum logic; decision theory, inductive logic, logics of belief change, and formal epistemology; defeasible and nonmonotonic logics; formal philosophy of language; vagueness; and theories of truth and validity. In addition to publishing papers on philosophical logic in this familiar sense of the term, the Journal also invites papers on extensions of logic to new areas of application, and on the philosophical issues to which these give rise. The Journal places a special emphasis on the applications of philosophical logic in other disciplines, not only in mathematics and the natural sciences but also, for example, in computer science, artificial intelligence, cognitive science, linguistics, jurisprudence, and the social sciences, such as economics, sociology, and political science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信