Grishma Gandhi, Vijay Anand K. Gopalakrishnan, Arup Ghosh
{"title":"玉米对海藻提取物和植物生长促进根瘤菌种子处理的反应","authors":"Grishma Gandhi, Vijay Anand K. Gopalakrishnan, Arup Ghosh","doi":"10.1007/s10811-024-03306-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and seaweed extracts (SWE) individually improve crop performances, but the response of crops upon their combined use is less understood. A field experiment on maize was carried out to evaluate the effect of seed priming with PGPR and undiluted SWE on the growth, yield, and nutritional quality of maize and soil properties. A split-plot design comprising 15 treatment combinations was laid out with SWE as the main factor (no SWE, <i>Kappaphycus alvarezii</i> and <i>Sargassum cinctum</i> extract, and PGPR as sub-plot factor (no PGPR, <i>Bacillus megaterium</i>, <i>B. subtilis</i>, <i>Paenibacillus polymyxa</i> and <i>Azotobacter chroococcum</i>). The composition and properties of SWE and PGPR were assessed. Without SWE, seed priming with all PGPR enhanced cob yield, the maximum improvement (32%) over no PGPR being recorded with <i>A. chroococcum</i> treatment. However, SWE priming along with PGPRs had no additional yield advantage compared to PGPR used alone. In the presence of either SWEs, <i>A. chroococcum</i> treatment was superior to other PGPR for most of the crop parameters like yield, carbohydrates and micro-nutrients in grains. The higher nutrient uptake agreed well with soil nutrient status after harvest. There were no deleterious effects on any parameters due to co-priming with <i>K. alvarezii</i> or <i>S. cinctum</i> extract with <i>A. chroococcum</i>, which was not the case with <i>B. subtilis</i> treatment where there was a significant decrease in growth and yield parameters despite evidence of increasing bacterial colony count. The study suggests the need for assessing optimal SWE doses for combinatorial PGPR treatments.</p>","PeriodicalId":15086,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Phycology","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response of maize to seed priming with seaweed extracts and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria\",\"authors\":\"Grishma Gandhi, Vijay Anand K. Gopalakrishnan, Arup Ghosh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10811-024-03306-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and seaweed extracts (SWE) individually improve crop performances, but the response of crops upon their combined use is less understood. A field experiment on maize was carried out to evaluate the effect of seed priming with PGPR and undiluted SWE on the growth, yield, and nutritional quality of maize and soil properties. A split-plot design comprising 15 treatment combinations was laid out with SWE as the main factor (no SWE, <i>Kappaphycus alvarezii</i> and <i>Sargassum cinctum</i> extract, and PGPR as sub-plot factor (no PGPR, <i>Bacillus megaterium</i>, <i>B. subtilis</i>, <i>Paenibacillus polymyxa</i> and <i>Azotobacter chroococcum</i>). The composition and properties of SWE and PGPR were assessed. Without SWE, seed priming with all PGPR enhanced cob yield, the maximum improvement (32%) over no PGPR being recorded with <i>A. chroococcum</i> treatment. However, SWE priming along with PGPRs had no additional yield advantage compared to PGPR used alone. In the presence of either SWEs, <i>A. chroococcum</i> treatment was superior to other PGPR for most of the crop parameters like yield, carbohydrates and micro-nutrients in grains. The higher nutrient uptake agreed well with soil nutrient status after harvest. There were no deleterious effects on any parameters due to co-priming with <i>K. alvarezii</i> or <i>S. cinctum</i> extract with <i>A. chroococcum</i>, which was not the case with <i>B. subtilis</i> treatment where there was a significant decrease in growth and yield parameters despite evidence of increasing bacterial colony count. The study suggests the need for assessing optimal SWE doses for combinatorial PGPR treatments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15086,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Phycology\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Phycology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-024-03306-x\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Phycology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10811-024-03306-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
植物生长促进根瘤菌(PGPR)和海藻提取物(SWE)可单独改善作物的生长表现,但人们对两者结合使用时作物的反应却知之甚少。我们对玉米进行了一项田间试验,以评估用 PGPR 和未稀释的 SWE 进行种子处理对玉米的生长、产量、营养质量和土壤特性的影响。以 SWE 为主因子(无 SWE、Kappaphycus alvarezii 和 Sargassum cinctum 提取物),PGPR 为副因子(无 PGPR、巨型芽孢杆菌、枯草芽孢杆菌、多粘芽孢杆菌和根瘤酵母菌),采用分小区设计,包括 15 个处理组合。对 SWE 和 PGPR 的成分和特性进行了评估。在不使用 SWE 的情况下,使用所有 PGPR 进行种子处理都能提高玉米棒产量,与不使用 PGPR 的情况相比,A. chroococcum 处理的玉米棒产量提高幅度最大(32%)。然而,与单独使用 PGPR 相比,在使用 SWE 和 PGPR 的情况下,没有额外的产量优势。在有 SWE 的情况下,就大多数作物参数(如产量、碳水化合物和谷物中的微量营养元素)而言,A. chroococcum 处理优于其他 PGPR。较高的养分吸收率与收获后的土壤养分状况一致。使用 K. alvarezii 或 S. cinctum 提取物与 A. chroococcum 共同灌溉对任何参数都没有有害影响,而使用枯草芽孢杆菌处理的情况则不同,尽管有证据表明细菌菌落数在增加,但生长和产量参数却显著下降。这项研究表明,有必要评估组合 PGPR 处理的最佳 SWE 剂量。
Response of maize to seed priming with seaweed extracts and plant growth promoting rhizobacteria
Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) and seaweed extracts (SWE) individually improve crop performances, but the response of crops upon their combined use is less understood. A field experiment on maize was carried out to evaluate the effect of seed priming with PGPR and undiluted SWE on the growth, yield, and nutritional quality of maize and soil properties. A split-plot design comprising 15 treatment combinations was laid out with SWE as the main factor (no SWE, Kappaphycus alvarezii and Sargassum cinctum extract, and PGPR as sub-plot factor (no PGPR, Bacillus megaterium, B. subtilis, Paenibacillus polymyxa and Azotobacter chroococcum). The composition and properties of SWE and PGPR were assessed. Without SWE, seed priming with all PGPR enhanced cob yield, the maximum improvement (32%) over no PGPR being recorded with A. chroococcum treatment. However, SWE priming along with PGPRs had no additional yield advantage compared to PGPR used alone. In the presence of either SWEs, A. chroococcum treatment was superior to other PGPR for most of the crop parameters like yield, carbohydrates and micro-nutrients in grains. The higher nutrient uptake agreed well with soil nutrient status after harvest. There were no deleterious effects on any parameters due to co-priming with K. alvarezii or S. cinctum extract with A. chroococcum, which was not the case with B. subtilis treatment where there was a significant decrease in growth and yield parameters despite evidence of increasing bacterial colony count. The study suggests the need for assessing optimal SWE doses for combinatorial PGPR treatments.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Applied Phycology publishes work on the rapidly expanding subject of the commercial use of algae.
The journal accepts submissions on fundamental research, development of techniques and practical applications in such areas as algal and cyanobacterial biotechnology and genetic engineering, tissues culture, culture collections, commercially useful micro-algae and their products, mariculture, algalization and soil fertility, pollution and fouling, monitoring, toxicity tests, toxic compounds, antibiotics and other biologically active compounds.
Each issue of the Journal of Applied Phycology also includes a short section for brief notes and general information on new products, patents and company news.