促进帕金森病代表性不足人群参与研究的包容性:FIRE-UP PD 研究。

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Juliana M. Ison , Jonathan D. Jackson , Helen Hemley , Allison Willis , Bernadette Siddiqi , Eric A. Macklin , Christine Ulysse , Michael S. Fitts , Tiffany T.-H. Pham , Mitra Afshari , Pinky Agarwal , Michael Aminoff , Stephanie Bissonnette , Michelle Fullard , Tarannum S. Khan , Danielle N. Larson , Catherine Wielinski , Angie V. Sanchez
{"title":"促进帕金森病代表性不足人群参与研究的包容性:FIRE-UP PD 研究。","authors":"Juliana M. Ison ,&nbsp;Jonathan D. Jackson ,&nbsp;Helen Hemley ,&nbsp;Allison Willis ,&nbsp;Bernadette Siddiqi ,&nbsp;Eric A. Macklin ,&nbsp;Christine Ulysse ,&nbsp;Michael S. Fitts ,&nbsp;Tiffany T.-H. Pham ,&nbsp;Mitra Afshari ,&nbsp;Pinky Agarwal ,&nbsp;Michael Aminoff ,&nbsp;Stephanie Bissonnette ,&nbsp;Michelle Fullard ,&nbsp;Tarannum S. Khan ,&nbsp;Danielle N. Larson ,&nbsp;Catherine Wielinski ,&nbsp;Angie V. Sanchez","doi":"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Members of vulnerable populations are underrepresented in Parkinson's disease (PD) research. A complex web of research barriers perpetuates this gap. Community-based research methods are one approach to addressing this issue. The present PD study was designed to examine the effectiveness of community-based interventions to overcome barriers and increase research participation among underrepresented groups (URGs).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eight study sites across the US were selected and paired based on proposed interventions with specific URGs. Surveys assessed knowledge and attitudes toward PD research. Finally, researchers examined whether the present study affected recruitment to Fox Insight, an online PD research study also recruiting at each site.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 474 participants were recruited. At post-intervention for the FIRE-UP PD Study, recruitment increased significantly in intervention compared to control sites among Black and African American non-Hispanic/Latino populations (<em>p</em> = 0.003), White Hispanic/Latino (<em>p</em> = 0.003) populations, and Not Listed Hispanic/Latino populations (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) as well as those with an educational attainment of a high school diploma/General Education Diploma (GED) (<em>p</em> = 0.009), and an income &lt;$20,000 (<em>p</em> = 0.005) or between $20,000–$34,999 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Study surveys measuring changes in awareness and attitudes toward PD research had mixed results. In Fox Insight, 181 participants were passively recruited with a shift toward more diverse participant demographics.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Research participation demographics reflective of the general population are critical to PD investigation and treatment. The FIRE-UP PD Study showed the effectiveness of localized community engagement strategies in increasing URG recruitment to PD research. Therefore, further PD research employing community-based methods to improve diverse participant recruitment is needed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10636,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary clinical trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fostering Inclusivity in Research Engagement for Underrepresented Populations in Parkinson's Disease: The FIRE-UP PD study\",\"authors\":\"Juliana M. Ison ,&nbsp;Jonathan D. Jackson ,&nbsp;Helen Hemley ,&nbsp;Allison Willis ,&nbsp;Bernadette Siddiqi ,&nbsp;Eric A. Macklin ,&nbsp;Christine Ulysse ,&nbsp;Michael S. Fitts ,&nbsp;Tiffany T.-H. Pham ,&nbsp;Mitra Afshari ,&nbsp;Pinky Agarwal ,&nbsp;Michael Aminoff ,&nbsp;Stephanie Bissonnette ,&nbsp;Michelle Fullard ,&nbsp;Tarannum S. Khan ,&nbsp;Danielle N. Larson ,&nbsp;Catherine Wielinski ,&nbsp;Angie V. Sanchez\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cct.2024.107619\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Members of vulnerable populations are underrepresented in Parkinson's disease (PD) research. A complex web of research barriers perpetuates this gap. Community-based research methods are one approach to addressing this issue. The present PD study was designed to examine the effectiveness of community-based interventions to overcome barriers and increase research participation among underrepresented groups (URGs).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Eight study sites across the US were selected and paired based on proposed interventions with specific URGs. Surveys assessed knowledge and attitudes toward PD research. Finally, researchers examined whether the present study affected recruitment to Fox Insight, an online PD research study also recruiting at each site.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 474 participants were recruited. At post-intervention for the FIRE-UP PD Study, recruitment increased significantly in intervention compared to control sites among Black and African American non-Hispanic/Latino populations (<em>p</em> = 0.003), White Hispanic/Latino (<em>p</em> = 0.003) populations, and Not Listed Hispanic/Latino populations (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001) as well as those with an educational attainment of a high school diploma/General Education Diploma (GED) (<em>p</em> = 0.009), and an income &lt;$20,000 (<em>p</em> = 0.005) or between $20,000–$34,999 (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). Study surveys measuring changes in awareness and attitudes toward PD research had mixed results. In Fox Insight, 181 participants were passively recruited with a shift toward more diverse participant demographics.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Research participation demographics reflective of the general population are critical to PD investigation and treatment. The FIRE-UP PD Study showed the effectiveness of localized community engagement strategies in increasing URG recruitment to PD research. Therefore, further PD research employing community-based methods to improve diverse participant recruitment is needed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424002027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551714424002027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:弱势人群在帕金森病(PD)研究中的代表性不足。复杂的研究障碍网络使这一差距长期存在。基于社区的研究方法是解决这一问题的方法之一。本帕金森病研究旨在考察基于社区的干预措施在克服障碍和提高代表性不足群体(URGs)的研究参与度方面的有效性:方法:在全美范围内选择了八个研究地点,并根据与特定 URGs 的拟议干预措施进行配对。调查评估了对 PD 研究的认识和态度。最后,研究人员考察了本研究是否会影响 Fox Insight 的招募工作,Fox Insight 是一项在线 PD 研究,也在各研究地点进行招募:总共招募了 474 名参与者。在 "FIRE-UP PD 研究 "干预后,与对照地点相比,干预地点的黑人和非裔美国人非西班牙裔/拉美裔人群(p = 0.003)、西班牙裔/拉美裔白人(p = 0.003)和未列名西班牙裔/拉美裔人群(p 结论:"FIRE-UP PD 研究 "干预后的招募人数显著增加:反映普通人群的研究参与人口统计学对于帕金森病的调查和治疗至关重要。FIRE-UP PD 研究表明,本地化的社区参与策略在增加 PD 研究的 URG 招募方面非常有效。因此,有必要进一步开展以社区为基础的帕金森病研究,以改善不同参与者的招募情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fostering Inclusivity in Research Engagement for Underrepresented Populations in Parkinson's Disease: The FIRE-UP PD study

Background

Members of vulnerable populations are underrepresented in Parkinson's disease (PD) research. A complex web of research barriers perpetuates this gap. Community-based research methods are one approach to addressing this issue. The present PD study was designed to examine the effectiveness of community-based interventions to overcome barriers and increase research participation among underrepresented groups (URGs).

Methods

Eight study sites across the US were selected and paired based on proposed interventions with specific URGs. Surveys assessed knowledge and attitudes toward PD research. Finally, researchers examined whether the present study affected recruitment to Fox Insight, an online PD research study also recruiting at each site.

Results

In total, 474 participants were recruited. At post-intervention for the FIRE-UP PD Study, recruitment increased significantly in intervention compared to control sites among Black and African American non-Hispanic/Latino populations (p = 0.003), White Hispanic/Latino (p = 0.003) populations, and Not Listed Hispanic/Latino populations (p < 0.001) as well as those with an educational attainment of a high school diploma/General Education Diploma (GED) (p = 0.009), and an income <$20,000 (p = 0.005) or between $20,000–$34,999 (p < 0.001). Study surveys measuring changes in awareness and attitudes toward PD research had mixed results. In Fox Insight, 181 participants were passively recruited with a shift toward more diverse participant demographics.

Conclusion

Research participation demographics reflective of the general population are critical to PD investigation and treatment. The FIRE-UP PD Study showed the effectiveness of localized community engagement strategies in increasing URG recruitment to PD research. Therefore, further PD research employing community-based methods to improve diverse participant recruitment is needed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
281
审稿时长
44 days
期刊介绍: Contemporary Clinical Trials is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes manuscripts pertaining to all aspects of clinical trials, including, but not limited to, design, conduct, analysis, regulation and ethics. Manuscripts submitted should appeal to a readership drawn from disciplines including medicine, biostatistics, epidemiology, computer science, management science, behavioural science, pharmaceutical science, and bioethics. Full-length papers and short communications not exceeding 1,500 words, as well as systemic reviews of clinical trials and methodologies will be published. Perspectives/commentaries on current issues and the impact of clinical trials on the practice of medicine and health policy are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信