团队反思的自我评价和观察者评价:混合方法

Q2 Psychology
Sabrina Krys, Kai-Philip Otte
{"title":"团队反思的自我评价和观察者评价:混合方法","authors":"Sabrina Krys,&nbsp;Kai-Philip Otte","doi":"10.1016/j.metip.2024.100154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The extent to which self- and observer ratings of team reflection are related and whether the different data sources can explain incremental variance in team performance improvement has not yet been examined. We therefore studied teams working on a hidden profile task. Team reflection was measured using self-reports and audio data. Self- and observer ratings did not correlate with each other but simultaneously predicted team performance improvement. In contrast to self-ratings, observer-rated quality positively predicted performance improvement independent of controlling for observer-rated quantity. Conclusively, both data sources appear to be diagnostically valuable and should be considered when examining team reflection.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":93338,"journal":{"name":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260124000201/pdfft?md5=fb1acec45529daeafa5f473f3c9eee25&pid=1-s2.0-S2590260124000201-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Self- and observer ratings of team reflection: A mixed methods approach\",\"authors\":\"Sabrina Krys,&nbsp;Kai-Philip Otte\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.metip.2024.100154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The extent to which self- and observer ratings of team reflection are related and whether the different data sources can explain incremental variance in team performance improvement has not yet been examined. We therefore studied teams working on a hidden profile task. Team reflection was measured using self-reports and audio data. Self- and observer ratings did not correlate with each other but simultaneously predicted team performance improvement. In contrast to self-ratings, observer-rated quality positively predicted performance improvement independent of controlling for observer-rated quantity. Conclusively, both data sources appear to be diagnostically valuable and should be considered when examining team reflection.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Methods in Psychology (Online)\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100154\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260124000201/pdfft?md5=fb1acec45529daeafa5f473f3c9eee25&pid=1-s2.0-S2590260124000201-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Methods in Psychology (Online)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260124000201\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Psychology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods in Psychology (Online)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590260124000201","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于团队反思的自我评价和观察者评价之间的关联程度,以及不同的数据来源能否解释团队绩效改进中的增量差异,尚未进行过研究。因此,我们研究了执行隐性剖析任务的团队。团队反思通过自我报告和音频数据进行测量。自我评分和观察者评分互不相关,但同时预测了团队绩效的提高。与自我评价相反,观察者评价的质量对成绩的提高有积极的预测作用,与观察者评价的数量无关。总之,这两种数据来源似乎都具有诊断价值,在研究团队反思时应加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Self- and observer ratings of team reflection: A mixed methods approach

The extent to which self- and observer ratings of team reflection are related and whether the different data sources can explain incremental variance in team performance improvement has not yet been examined. We therefore studied teams working on a hidden profile task. Team reflection was measured using self-reports and audio data. Self- and observer ratings did not correlate with each other but simultaneously predicted team performance improvement. In contrast to self-ratings, observer-rated quality positively predicted performance improvement independent of controlling for observer-rated quantity. Conclusively, both data sources appear to be diagnostically valuable and should be considered when examining team reflection.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Methods in Psychology (Online)
Methods in Psychology (Online) Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信