不同生根材料对育成猪行为和福利的影响

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Ellen Marie Rosvold , Marko Ocepek , Inger Lise Andersen
{"title":"不同生根材料对育成猪行为和福利的影响","authors":"Ellen Marie Rosvold ,&nbsp;Marko Ocepek ,&nbsp;Inger Lise Andersen","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106344","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Provision of rooting material is important to meet the pig`s need for exploration when housed inside. In this experiment we investigated the effects of different types of rooting materials and a weekly rotation in different materials on behaviour and welfare of finishing pigs. We predicted that access to rooting material would lead to more positive and less negative behaviours, and a lower proportion of pigs with bite marks on ears, tail, and body.</p><p>During two batches with a total of 360 finishing pigs, with 10 pigs per pen, rooting material was provided twice a day (pellets, peat, straw, hay, weekly rotation of these materials, or controls with sawdust) over 12 weeks. Behaviour was recorded from video in the two most active periods of the day; immediately after material provision, for 60 minutes, with instantaneous scan sampling every 6 min. and 1/0 sampling. Welfare protocol data was collected in weeks 1,2,3 and 12.</p><p>Provision of rooting material resulted in more exploration (P &lt; 0.001), play (P &lt; 0.001) and tail wagging (P = 0.010) compared to the control group, except for pellets where exploration level was even lower than controls. Rooting material also led to less tail biting (P = 0.002) and manipulation of pen fittings (P &lt; 0.001) compared to the control group. Straw and rotation of materials resulted in less ear biting (P &lt; 0.001), and straw in fewer observations with the tail hanging down or tucked between the legs (P &lt; 0.001). Aggression was not reduced (P = 0.036), and non-aggressive social contact was lower with rooting materials compared to controls (P = 0.002). Pigs provided with peat, straw, and hay had a lower proportion of bite marks on the tail (P &lt; 0.001), whereas pellets and rotation groups were higher than controls in this respect. All rooting materials except for pellets resulted in a lower proportion of bite marks on the body compared to controls (P = 0.018). Levels of exploration, play, aggression, ear biting, tail curled, wagging and hanging down (P &lt; 0.001), and tail biting (P = 0.052), were all higher in the first weeks of the experiment and declined with increasing age. Groups with a weekly rotation in materials showed the highest level of exploration throughout the experimental period (P &lt; 0.001).</p><p>Our results suggest that straw and hay are highly valued as resources for finishing pigs, and material rotation is the most stimulating.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"277 ","pages":"Article 106344"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159124001928/pdfft?md5=bdde35be7e8baf3ed9dacf16c304cc40&pid=1-s2.0-S0168159124001928-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of different rooting materials on behaviour and welfare of finishing pigs\",\"authors\":\"Ellen Marie Rosvold ,&nbsp;Marko Ocepek ,&nbsp;Inger Lise Andersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106344\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Provision of rooting material is important to meet the pig`s need for exploration when housed inside. In this experiment we investigated the effects of different types of rooting materials and a weekly rotation in different materials on behaviour and welfare of finishing pigs. We predicted that access to rooting material would lead to more positive and less negative behaviours, and a lower proportion of pigs with bite marks on ears, tail, and body.</p><p>During two batches with a total of 360 finishing pigs, with 10 pigs per pen, rooting material was provided twice a day (pellets, peat, straw, hay, weekly rotation of these materials, or controls with sawdust) over 12 weeks. Behaviour was recorded from video in the two most active periods of the day; immediately after material provision, for 60 minutes, with instantaneous scan sampling every 6 min. and 1/0 sampling. Welfare protocol data was collected in weeks 1,2,3 and 12.</p><p>Provision of rooting material resulted in more exploration (P &lt; 0.001), play (P &lt; 0.001) and tail wagging (P = 0.010) compared to the control group, except for pellets where exploration level was even lower than controls. Rooting material also led to less tail biting (P = 0.002) and manipulation of pen fittings (P &lt; 0.001) compared to the control group. Straw and rotation of materials resulted in less ear biting (P &lt; 0.001), and straw in fewer observations with the tail hanging down or tucked between the legs (P &lt; 0.001). Aggression was not reduced (P = 0.036), and non-aggressive social contact was lower with rooting materials compared to controls (P = 0.002). Pigs provided with peat, straw, and hay had a lower proportion of bite marks on the tail (P &lt; 0.001), whereas pellets and rotation groups were higher than controls in this respect. All rooting materials except for pellets resulted in a lower proportion of bite marks on the body compared to controls (P = 0.018). Levels of exploration, play, aggression, ear biting, tail curled, wagging and hanging down (P &lt; 0.001), and tail biting (P = 0.052), were all higher in the first weeks of the experiment and declined with increasing age. Groups with a weekly rotation in materials showed the highest level of exploration throughout the experimental period (P &lt; 0.001).</p><p>Our results suggest that straw and hay are highly valued as resources for finishing pigs, and material rotation is the most stimulating.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"volume\":\"277 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106344\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159124001928/pdfft?md5=bdde35be7e8baf3ed9dacf16c304cc40&pid=1-s2.0-S0168159124001928-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159124001928\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159124001928","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提供生根材料对于满足猪在室内饲养时的探索需求非常重要。在本实验中,我们研究了不同类型的生根材料和每周轮换使用不同材料对育成猪行为和福利的影响。我们预测,获得生根材料将导致更多的积极行为和更少的消极行为,并降低耳朵、尾巴和身体上有咬痕的猪的比例。在两批共 360 头育成猪中,每栏 10 头猪,在 12 周内每天提供两次生根材料(颗粒、泥炭、稻草、干草、每周轮换使用这些材料或使用锯末作为对照)。在一天中最活跃的两个时段,即提供材料后的 60 分钟内,通过视频记录猪的行为,每 6 分钟进行一次瞬时扫描取样,并进行 1/0 取样。与对照组相比,提供生根材料会导致更多的探索(P <0.001)、玩耍(P <0.001)和摇尾巴(P = 0.010),但颗粒饲料除外,其探索水平甚至低于对照组。与对照组相比,生根材料也减少了咬尾(P = 0.002)和摆弄围栏配件(P < 0.001)。秸秆和轮换材料导致咬耳朵的情况减少(P <0.001),秸秆导致观察到的尾巴下垂或夹在两腿之间的情况减少(P <0.001)。与对照组相比,生根材料没有减少攻击性(P = 0.036),非攻击性社会接触较少(P = 0.002)。使用泥炭、稻草和干草的猪尾巴上咬痕的比例较低(P <0.001),而颗粒饲料组和轮换组在这方面的比例高于对照组。与对照组相比,除颗粒饲料外,所有生根材料都导致身体上咬痕的比例降低(P = 0.018)。探索、玩耍、攻击、咬耳、卷尾、摇尾和垂尾(P < 0.001)以及咬尾(P = 0.052)的水平在实验的前几周都较高,并随着日龄的增加而下降。我们的结果表明,秸秆和干草作为育成猪的资源价值很高,而材料轮换最能刺激它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of different rooting materials on behaviour and welfare of finishing pigs

Provision of rooting material is important to meet the pig`s need for exploration when housed inside. In this experiment we investigated the effects of different types of rooting materials and a weekly rotation in different materials on behaviour and welfare of finishing pigs. We predicted that access to rooting material would lead to more positive and less negative behaviours, and a lower proportion of pigs with bite marks on ears, tail, and body.

During two batches with a total of 360 finishing pigs, with 10 pigs per pen, rooting material was provided twice a day (pellets, peat, straw, hay, weekly rotation of these materials, or controls with sawdust) over 12 weeks. Behaviour was recorded from video in the two most active periods of the day; immediately after material provision, for 60 minutes, with instantaneous scan sampling every 6 min. and 1/0 sampling. Welfare protocol data was collected in weeks 1,2,3 and 12.

Provision of rooting material resulted in more exploration (P < 0.001), play (P < 0.001) and tail wagging (P = 0.010) compared to the control group, except for pellets where exploration level was even lower than controls. Rooting material also led to less tail biting (P = 0.002) and manipulation of pen fittings (P < 0.001) compared to the control group. Straw and rotation of materials resulted in less ear biting (P < 0.001), and straw in fewer observations with the tail hanging down or tucked between the legs (P < 0.001). Aggression was not reduced (P = 0.036), and non-aggressive social contact was lower with rooting materials compared to controls (P = 0.002). Pigs provided with peat, straw, and hay had a lower proportion of bite marks on the tail (P < 0.001), whereas pellets and rotation groups were higher than controls in this respect. All rooting materials except for pellets resulted in a lower proportion of bite marks on the body compared to controls (P = 0.018). Levels of exploration, play, aggression, ear biting, tail curled, wagging and hanging down (P < 0.001), and tail biting (P = 0.052), were all higher in the first weeks of the experiment and declined with increasing age. Groups with a weekly rotation in materials showed the highest level of exploration throughout the experimental period (P < 0.001).

Our results suggest that straw and hay are highly valued as resources for finishing pigs, and material rotation is the most stimulating.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 农林科学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
191
审稿时长
18.1 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals. Topics covered include: -Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare -Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems -Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation -Methodological studies within relevant fields The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects: -Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals -Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display -Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage -Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances -Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信