栖息地和诱饵策略对美国东南部浣熊口服狂犬病疫苗诱饵吸收的影响

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE
Jacob E. Hill , Madison L. Miller , Richard B. Chipman , Amy T. Gilbert , James C. Beasley , Guha Dharmarajan , Olin E. Rhodes
{"title":"栖息地和诱饵策略对美国东南部浣熊口服狂犬病疫苗诱饵吸收的影响","authors":"Jacob E. Hill ,&nbsp;Madison L. Miller ,&nbsp;Richard B. Chipman ,&nbsp;Amy T. Gilbert ,&nbsp;James C. Beasley ,&nbsp;Guha Dharmarajan ,&nbsp;Olin E. Rhodes","doi":"10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Oral rabies vaccination (ORV) is the primary tool for landscape level control and elimination of rabies virus in terrestrial wildlife species. However, there is currently a limited understanding of how different baiting strategies influence raccoon (<em>Procyon lotor</em>) uptake of ORV baits in non-agricultural habitats in the Southeastern United States, which may hinder the refinement of ORV management for raccoons in this region. Using a combination of new and existing data, we investigated the role of baited area (0.16 vs 3 km<sup>2</sup>), bait density (75 vs 150 baits/km<sup>2</sup>) and season (spring vs fall) on placebo ORV bait uptake by raccoons in four rural, non-agricultural habitats in the southeastern United States (bottomland hardwood forest, upland pine forest, riparian forest, and isolated wetlands). Increasing the baited area to 3 km<sup>2</sup> increased the proportion of raccoons that consumed baits by 140 % in riparian forests and decreased the proportion consuming baits by 70 % in bottomland hardwood forests. A greater proportion of raccoons consumed baits in riparian habitat in spring compared to fall, but bait density did not influence uptake in either season in this habitat. Increasing the bait density during spring in bottomland hardwoods increased the proportion of raccoons that consumed baits by 270 %, but there was no effect of increasing bait density in bottomland hardwoods during fall. We suggest that variation in habitat contiguity and seasonal resource availability influence how raccoons utilize these habitats which in turn impacts habitat-specific ORV bait uptake. The estimated proportion of raccoons that consumed baits did not exceed 60 % for any treatment, and for most treatments was less than 40 %. These low uptake rates indicate a need for research into additional strategies to maximize raccoon uptake of ORV baits across rural, non-agricultural southeastern landscapes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8222,"journal":{"name":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","volume":"277 ","pages":"Article 106320"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of habitat and baiting strategy on oral rabies vaccine bait uptake by raccoons in the southeastern United States\",\"authors\":\"Jacob E. Hill ,&nbsp;Madison L. Miller ,&nbsp;Richard B. Chipman ,&nbsp;Amy T. Gilbert ,&nbsp;James C. Beasley ,&nbsp;Guha Dharmarajan ,&nbsp;Olin E. Rhodes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.applanim.2024.106320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Oral rabies vaccination (ORV) is the primary tool for landscape level control and elimination of rabies virus in terrestrial wildlife species. However, there is currently a limited understanding of how different baiting strategies influence raccoon (<em>Procyon lotor</em>) uptake of ORV baits in non-agricultural habitats in the Southeastern United States, which may hinder the refinement of ORV management for raccoons in this region. Using a combination of new and existing data, we investigated the role of baited area (0.16 vs 3 km<sup>2</sup>), bait density (75 vs 150 baits/km<sup>2</sup>) and season (spring vs fall) on placebo ORV bait uptake by raccoons in four rural, non-agricultural habitats in the southeastern United States (bottomland hardwood forest, upland pine forest, riparian forest, and isolated wetlands). Increasing the baited area to 3 km<sup>2</sup> increased the proportion of raccoons that consumed baits by 140 % in riparian forests and decreased the proportion consuming baits by 70 % in bottomland hardwood forests. A greater proportion of raccoons consumed baits in riparian habitat in spring compared to fall, but bait density did not influence uptake in either season in this habitat. Increasing the bait density during spring in bottomland hardwoods increased the proportion of raccoons that consumed baits by 270 %, but there was no effect of increasing bait density in bottomland hardwoods during fall. We suggest that variation in habitat contiguity and seasonal resource availability influence how raccoons utilize these habitats which in turn impacts habitat-specific ORV bait uptake. The estimated proportion of raccoons that consumed baits did not exceed 60 % for any treatment, and for most treatments was less than 40 %. These low uptake rates indicate a need for research into additional strategies to maximize raccoon uptake of ORV baits across rural, non-agricultural southeastern landscapes.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"volume\":\"277 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106320\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Animal Behaviour Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159124001680\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Animal Behaviour Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168159124001680","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

口服狂犬病疫苗(ORV)是在陆地野生动物物种中控制和消灭狂犬病病毒的主要工具。然而,目前对不同诱饵策略如何影响美国东南部非农业栖息地的浣熊(Procyon lotor)对口服狂犬病疫苗诱饵的吸收的了解还很有限,这可能会阻碍该地区对浣熊口服狂犬病疫苗管理的完善。利用新数据和现有数据,我们在美国东南部的四个农村非农业栖息地(底地硬木林、高地松树林、河岸林和孤立湿地)调查了诱饵投放面积(0.16 vs 3 km2)、诱饵密度(75 vs 150个/km2)和季节(春季 vs 秋季)对浣熊摄取放置ORV诱饵的影响。将毒饵投放面积增加到 3 平方公里后,河岸森林中浣熊食用毒饵的比例增加了 140%,而底层硬木森林中浣熊食用毒饵的比例减少了 70%。与秋季相比,春季河岸栖息地的浣熊食用诱饵的比例更高,但诱饵密度并不影响该栖息地两个季节的浣熊摄食量。春季在底层阔叶林中增加诱饵密度可使浣熊摄食诱饵的比例增加 270%,但秋季在底层阔叶林中增加诱饵密度则没有影响。我们认为,栖息地毗连性和季节性资源可用性的变化会影响浣熊如何利用这些栖息地,进而影响特定栖息地的ORV诱饵摄取量。在任何处理中,估计浣熊摄食诱饵的比例都不超过 60%,在大多数处理中都低于 40%。这些低摄取率表明,有必要研究其他策略,以最大限度地提高浣熊对东南部农村非农业景观中ORV诱饵的摄取率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of habitat and baiting strategy on oral rabies vaccine bait uptake by raccoons in the southeastern United States

Oral rabies vaccination (ORV) is the primary tool for landscape level control and elimination of rabies virus in terrestrial wildlife species. However, there is currently a limited understanding of how different baiting strategies influence raccoon (Procyon lotor) uptake of ORV baits in non-agricultural habitats in the Southeastern United States, which may hinder the refinement of ORV management for raccoons in this region. Using a combination of new and existing data, we investigated the role of baited area (0.16 vs 3 km2), bait density (75 vs 150 baits/km2) and season (spring vs fall) on placebo ORV bait uptake by raccoons in four rural, non-agricultural habitats in the southeastern United States (bottomland hardwood forest, upland pine forest, riparian forest, and isolated wetlands). Increasing the baited area to 3 km2 increased the proportion of raccoons that consumed baits by 140 % in riparian forests and decreased the proportion consuming baits by 70 % in bottomland hardwood forests. A greater proportion of raccoons consumed baits in riparian habitat in spring compared to fall, but bait density did not influence uptake in either season in this habitat. Increasing the bait density during spring in bottomland hardwoods increased the proportion of raccoons that consumed baits by 270 %, but there was no effect of increasing bait density in bottomland hardwoods during fall. We suggest that variation in habitat contiguity and seasonal resource availability influence how raccoons utilize these habitats which in turn impacts habitat-specific ORV bait uptake. The estimated proportion of raccoons that consumed baits did not exceed 60 % for any treatment, and for most treatments was less than 40 %. These low uptake rates indicate a need for research into additional strategies to maximize raccoon uptake of ORV baits across rural, non-agricultural southeastern landscapes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Applied Animal Behaviour Science 农林科学-行为科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
21.70%
发文量
191
审稿时长
18.1 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal publishes relevant information on the behaviour of domesticated and utilized animals. Topics covered include: -Behaviour of farm, zoo and laboratory animals in relation to animal management and welfare -Behaviour of companion animals in relation to behavioural problems, for example, in relation to the training of dogs for different purposes, in relation to behavioural problems -Studies of the behaviour of wild animals when these studies are relevant from an applied perspective, for example in relation to wildlife management, pest management or nature conservation -Methodological studies within relevant fields The principal subjects are farm, companion and laboratory animals, including, of course, poultry. The journal also deals with the following animal subjects: -Those involved in any farming system, e.g. deer, rabbits and fur-bearing animals -Those in ANY form of confinement, e.g. zoos, safari parks and other forms of display -Feral animals, and any animal species which impinge on farming operations, e.g. as causes of loss or damage -Species used for hunting, recreation etc. may also be considered as acceptable subjects in some instances -Laboratory animals, if the material relates to their behavioural requirements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信