肺癌继发肾上腺转移热消融的安全性和有效性

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Andrew M. Mendez , Elena N. Petre , Etay Ziv , Fourat Ridouani , Stephen B. Solomon , Vlasios Sotirchos , Ken Zhao , Erica S. Alexander
{"title":"肺癌继发肾上腺转移热消融的安全性和有效性","authors":"Andrew M. Mendez ,&nbsp;Elena N. Petre ,&nbsp;Etay Ziv ,&nbsp;Fourat Ridouani ,&nbsp;Stephen B. Solomon ,&nbsp;Vlasios Sotirchos ,&nbsp;Ken Zhao ,&nbsp;Erica S. Alexander","doi":"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Assess safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for adrenal metastases (AM) secondary to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included patients with NSCLC AM treated with thermal ablation between 2/2010–11/2021. Local tumor progression free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seven patients (mean age ± SD, 63.9 ± 12.5 years; 6 males) with seven AM were treated in eight sessions. Retreatment was performed in one patient with residual disease. Five sessions were with microwave ablation and 3 with radiofrequency ablation. Mean tumor size was 20.1 ± 7.0 mm. Median number of ablation probes used was 1 (range, 1–5), with a median of 3 activations (range, 1–3), and average ablation time of 14.4 ± 15.0 minutes. Response based on RECIST v 1.1 or PERCIST criteria revealed stable disease in 1 tumor, progression of disease in 3 tumors (one was re-ablated), and partial response in 3 tumors. Median LTPFS was not reached (NR) [95 % CI: 1- NR]. Median OS was 47.97 months (95 % CI: 18.63- NR).</p><p>Intraprocedural hypertension (blood pressure ≥180 mmHg) occurred during 5/8 (62.5 %) sessions and intraoperative tachycardia occurred during 2/8 (25 %) sessions. Complications within one month of ablation occurred in 3/8 (37.5 %) sessions: grade 2 pneumothorax, grade 1 hematuria, and grade 2 adrenal insufficiency.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this small series, thermal ablation for NSCLC AM resulted in prolonged local control and OS with no major complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51185,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation of adrenal metastases secondary to lung cancer\",\"authors\":\"Andrew M. Mendez ,&nbsp;Elena N. Petre ,&nbsp;Etay Ziv ,&nbsp;Fourat Ridouani ,&nbsp;Stephen B. Solomon ,&nbsp;Vlasios Sotirchos ,&nbsp;Ken Zhao ,&nbsp;Erica S. Alexander\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.suronc.2024.102102\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Assess safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for adrenal metastases (AM) secondary to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included patients with NSCLC AM treated with thermal ablation between 2/2010–11/2021. Local tumor progression free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seven patients (mean age ± SD, 63.9 ± 12.5 years; 6 males) with seven AM were treated in eight sessions. Retreatment was performed in one patient with residual disease. Five sessions were with microwave ablation and 3 with radiofrequency ablation. Mean tumor size was 20.1 ± 7.0 mm. Median number of ablation probes used was 1 (range, 1–5), with a median of 3 activations (range, 1–3), and average ablation time of 14.4 ± 15.0 minutes. Response based on RECIST v 1.1 or PERCIST criteria revealed stable disease in 1 tumor, progression of disease in 3 tumors (one was re-ablated), and partial response in 3 tumors. Median LTPFS was not reached (NR) [95 % CI: 1- NR]. Median OS was 47.97 months (95 % CI: 18.63- NR).</p><p>Intraprocedural hypertension (blood pressure ≥180 mmHg) occurred during 5/8 (62.5 %) sessions and intraoperative tachycardia occurred during 2/8 (25 %) sessions. Complications within one month of ablation occurred in 3/8 (37.5 %) sessions: grade 2 pneumothorax, grade 1 hematuria, and grade 2 adrenal insufficiency.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In this small series, thermal ablation for NSCLC AM resulted in prolonged local control and OS with no major complications.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Oncology-Oxford\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Oncology-Oxford\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740424000707\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Oncology-Oxford","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960740424000707","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估热消融治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)继发性肾上腺转移瘤(AM)的安全性和有效性。材料和方法这项回顾性研究纳入了2010年2月至2021年11月期间接受热消融治疗的NSCLC AM患者。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法计算无局部肿瘤进展生存期(LTPFS)和总生存期(OS)。结果7名患者(平均年龄± SD,63.9± 12.5岁;6名男性)共接受了8次治疗,其中有7例AM。对一名有残留疾病的患者进行了再治疗。其中五次采用微波消融术,三次采用射频消融术。肿瘤平均大小为 20.1 ± 7.0 毫米。所用消融探头的中位数为 1 个(1-5 个不等),激活次数中位数为 3 次(1-3 次不等),平均消融时间为 14.4 ± 15.0 分钟。根据 RECIST v 1.1 或 PERCIST 标准得出的反应结果显示,1 例肿瘤病情稳定,3 例肿瘤病情进展(其中 1 例再次消融),3 例肿瘤部分反应。中位 LTPFS 未达到 (NR) [95 % CI: 1- NR]。术中高血压(血压≥180 mmHg)发生在 5/8 次(62.5%)手术中,术中心动过速发生在 2/8 次(25%)手术中。3/8(37.5%)次消融术后一个月内出现并发症:2级气胸、1级血尿和2级肾上腺功能不全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety and efficacy of thermal ablation of adrenal metastases secondary to lung cancer

Objectives

Assess safety and efficacy of thermal ablation for adrenal metastases (AM) secondary to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Materials and methods

This retrospective study included patients with NSCLC AM treated with thermal ablation between 2/2010–11/2021. Local tumor progression free survival (LTPFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events were graded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.

Results

Seven patients (mean age ± SD, 63.9 ± 12.5 years; 6 males) with seven AM were treated in eight sessions. Retreatment was performed in one patient with residual disease. Five sessions were with microwave ablation and 3 with radiofrequency ablation. Mean tumor size was 20.1 ± 7.0 mm. Median number of ablation probes used was 1 (range, 1–5), with a median of 3 activations (range, 1–3), and average ablation time of 14.4 ± 15.0 minutes. Response based on RECIST v 1.1 or PERCIST criteria revealed stable disease in 1 tumor, progression of disease in 3 tumors (one was re-ablated), and partial response in 3 tumors. Median LTPFS was not reached (NR) [95 % CI: 1- NR]. Median OS was 47.97 months (95 % CI: 18.63- NR).

Intraprocedural hypertension (blood pressure ≥180 mmHg) occurred during 5/8 (62.5 %) sessions and intraoperative tachycardia occurred during 2/8 (25 %) sessions. Complications within one month of ablation occurred in 3/8 (37.5 %) sessions: grade 2 pneumothorax, grade 1 hematuria, and grade 2 adrenal insufficiency.

Conclusions

In this small series, thermal ablation for NSCLC AM resulted in prolonged local control and OS with no major complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical Oncology-Oxford
Surgical Oncology-Oxford 医学-外科
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
169
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Surgical Oncology is a peer reviewed journal publishing review articles that contribute to the advancement of knowledge in surgical oncology and related fields of interest. Articles represent a spectrum of current technology in oncology research as well as those concerning clinical trials, surgical technique, methods of investigation and patient evaluation. Surgical Oncology publishes comprehensive Reviews that examine individual topics in considerable detail, in addition to editorials and commentaries which focus on selected papers. The journal also publishes special issues which explore topics of interest to surgical oncologists in great detail - outlining recent advancements and providing readers with the most up to date information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信