请勿尝试心肺复苏术":大流行如何改变了观念和实践

Mark Taubert, John Idris Baker, Anna Hudson, Elin Harding
{"title":"请勿尝试心肺复苏术\":大流行如何改变了观念和实践","authors":"Mark Taubert,&nbsp;John Idris Baker,&nbsp;Anna Hudson,&nbsp;Elin Harding","doi":"10.1016/j.mpmed.2024.04.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this article, the authors look at the current literature and studies around ‘Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation’ (DNACPR) discussions and decisions, and how the global coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic brought increased focus on this area of practice. For patients with incurable, advancing illness, having discussions to ascertain their views about CPR, and suggesting and instituting advance care planning measures such as ‘Do Not Attempt CPR’ forms, is becoming part of normal practice in medical settings. Yet all decisions must be individualized to each patient. There was evidence of increased decision-making regarding DNACPR during the pandemic, with concerns raised in the press and on social media. Here, we discuss how this has changed with the global COVID-19 pandemic, where concerns about blanket decision-making and lack of candour in discussing DNACPR decisions with patients and those close to them were raised.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74157,"journal":{"name":"Medicine (Abingdon, England : UK ed.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Do Not Attempt CPR’: how the pandemic changed perceptions and practice\",\"authors\":\"Mark Taubert,&nbsp;John Idris Baker,&nbsp;Anna Hudson,&nbsp;Elin Harding\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mpmed.2024.04.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this article, the authors look at the current literature and studies around ‘Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation’ (DNACPR) discussions and decisions, and how the global coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic brought increased focus on this area of practice. For patients with incurable, advancing illness, having discussions to ascertain their views about CPR, and suggesting and instituting advance care planning measures such as ‘Do Not Attempt CPR’ forms, is becoming part of normal practice in medical settings. Yet all decisions must be individualized to each patient. There was evidence of increased decision-making regarding DNACPR during the pandemic, with concerns raised in the press and on social media. Here, we discuss how this has changed with the global COVID-19 pandemic, where concerns about blanket decision-making and lack of candour in discussing DNACPR decisions with patients and those close to them were raised.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine (Abingdon, England : UK ed.)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine (Abingdon, England : UK ed.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1357303924000859\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine (Abingdon, England : UK ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1357303924000859","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,作者审视了当前围绕 "不要尝试心肺复苏"(DNACPR)讨论和决定的文献和研究,以及全球冠状病毒疾病(COVID-19)大流行如何使人们更加关注这一实践领域。对于患有无法治愈的晚期疾病的患者,与他们进行讨论以确定他们对心肺复苏术的看法,并建议和制定预先护理计划措施(如 "不要尝试心肺复苏术 "表格),正在成为医疗机构正常实践的一部分。然而,所有决定都必须因人而异。有证据表明,在大流行病期间,有关 "不尝试心肺复苏 "的决策增加了,新闻界和社交媒体也对此表示担忧。在此,我们将讨论随着 COVID-19 在全球的流行,这种情况发生了怎样的变化,人们对一揽子决策以及在与患者及其亲近者讨论 DNACPR 决定时缺乏坦诚的态度表示担忧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Do Not Attempt CPR’: how the pandemic changed perceptions and practice

In this article, the authors look at the current literature and studies around ‘Do Not Attempt Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation’ (DNACPR) discussions and decisions, and how the global coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic brought increased focus on this area of practice. For patients with incurable, advancing illness, having discussions to ascertain their views about CPR, and suggesting and instituting advance care planning measures such as ‘Do Not Attempt CPR’ forms, is becoming part of normal practice in medical settings. Yet all decisions must be individualized to each patient. There was evidence of increased decision-making regarding DNACPR during the pandemic, with concerns raised in the press and on social media. Here, we discuss how this has changed with the global COVID-19 pandemic, where concerns about blanket decision-making and lack of candour in discussing DNACPR decisions with patients and those close to them were raised.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信