{"title":"康德哲学对当代医学伦理学的意义","authors":"Andrew Jones","doi":"10.1016/j.mpmed.2024.04.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this article I briefly consider the limitations of principlism, before considering how elements of Kant's philosophy can support medical ethics. I highlight the difference between the medical profession and other jobs, and consider how Kant's political philosophy potentially offers support to universal healthcare. I then consider how science and technology studies are essential for a more robust approach toward biomedical ethics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74157,"journal":{"name":"Medicine (Abingdon, England : UK ed.)","volume":"52 7","pages":"Pages 413-414"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relevance of Kant's philosophy for contemporary medical ethics\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mpmed.2024.04.014\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this article I briefly consider the limitations of principlism, before considering how elements of Kant's philosophy can support medical ethics. I highlight the difference between the medical profession and other jobs, and consider how Kant's political philosophy potentially offers support to universal healthcare. I then consider how science and technology studies are essential for a more robust approach toward biomedical ethics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74157,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine (Abingdon, England : UK ed.)\",\"volume\":\"52 7\",\"pages\":\"Pages 413-414\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine (Abingdon, England : UK ed.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1357303924001051\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine (Abingdon, England : UK ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1357303924001051","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
The relevance of Kant's philosophy for contemporary medical ethics
In this article I briefly consider the limitations of principlism, before considering how elements of Kant's philosophy can support medical ethics. I highlight the difference between the medical profession and other jobs, and consider how Kant's political philosophy potentially offers support to universal healthcare. I then consider how science and technology studies are essential for a more robust approach toward biomedical ethics.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
