使用胸部 CT 评估因肋骨骨折接受竖脊平面镇痛的成人的导管位置:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Maylyn Wu, Charbel Barrak, Patrick Forrest, Derek Rizzo, Carlos Eduardo Guerra-Londono
{"title":"使用胸部 CT 评估因肋骨骨折接受竖脊平面镇痛的成人的导管位置:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Maylyn Wu, Charbel Barrak, Patrick Forrest, Derek Rizzo, Carlos Eduardo Guerra-Londono","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105673","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous erector spinae plane (ESP) analgesia is a common adjuvant for patients with traumatic rib fracture pain and success relies on the ESP catheter remaining within the correct fascial plane for the duration of its placement. However, knowledge on postplacement position of indwelling ESP catheters is largely absent. We hypothesized that migration of over-the-needle ESP catheters was common and detectable with coincidental postprocedure CT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective cohort study, adults admitted to the surgical intensive care unit for traumatic rib fractures between January 2020 and July 2022 were screened. Those receiving continuous ESP analgesia via indwelling catheter and undergoing subsequent chest CT were included. The primary outcome was the proportion of catheters that migrated outside the ESP. The secondary outcome was the distance between the catheter tip and the nearest transverse process (TP) or fascial plane.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>160 medical records were screened for eligibility and 15 patients (18 catheters) met the inclusion criteria. 16 of 18 catheters reviewed were found outside the ESP. Furthermore, catheter position was reported as intramuscular in 14 catheters and subcutaneous in 4 catheters. The median distance between catheter tip and the nearest TP (or the ESP) was 23.20 mm sagittally and 25.05 mm axially.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most ESP catheters were found superficial to the fascial plane in the days following their placement. The median distance between the catheter and the ESP is between 23 and 25 mm. Prospective studies should address catheter migration concerns and propose solutions to this common issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":54503,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of catheter position using chest CT in adults undergoing erector spinae plane analgesia for rib fractures: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Maylyn Wu, Charbel Barrak, Patrick Forrest, Derek Rizzo, Carlos Eduardo Guerra-Londono\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/rapm-2024-105673\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous erector spinae plane (ESP) analgesia is a common adjuvant for patients with traumatic rib fracture pain and success relies on the ESP catheter remaining within the correct fascial plane for the duration of its placement. However, knowledge on postplacement position of indwelling ESP catheters is largely absent. We hypothesized that migration of over-the-needle ESP catheters was common and detectable with coincidental postprocedure CT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-center retrospective cohort study, adults admitted to the surgical intensive care unit for traumatic rib fractures between January 2020 and July 2022 were screened. Those receiving continuous ESP analgesia via indwelling catheter and undergoing subsequent chest CT were included. The primary outcome was the proportion of catheters that migrated outside the ESP. The secondary outcome was the distance between the catheter tip and the nearest transverse process (TP) or fascial plane.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>160 medical records were screened for eligibility and 15 patients (18 catheters) met the inclusion criteria. 16 of 18 catheters reviewed were found outside the ESP. Furthermore, catheter position was reported as intramuscular in 14 catheters and subcutaneous in 4 catheters. The median distance between catheter tip and the nearest TP (or the ESP) was 23.20 mm sagittally and 25.05 mm axially.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most ESP catheters were found superficial to the fascial plane in the days following their placement. The median distance between the catheter and the ESP is between 23 and 25 mm. Prospective studies should address catheter migration concerns and propose solutions to this common issue.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105673\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105673","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:持续直立脊平面(ESP)镇痛是外伤性肋骨骨折疼痛患者的常用辅助治疗方法,成功与否取决于 ESP 导管在置入期间是否始终位于正确的筋膜平面内。然而,有关留置 ESP 导管置入后位置的知识却基本欠缺。我们假设过针ESP导管的移位很常见,并且可以通过术后CT检测到:在这项单中心回顾性队列研究中,我们对 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 7 月期间因创伤性肋骨骨折入住外科重症监护室的成人进行了筛查。研究纳入了通过留置导管接受持续ESP镇痛并随后接受胸部CT检查的患者。主要结果是移出 ESP 的导管比例。次要结果是导管尖端与最近的横突(TP)或筋膜平面之间的距离:对 160 份病历进行了资格筛选,15 名患者(18 根导管)符合纳入标准。在审查的 18 条导管中,有 16 条被发现在 ESP 之外。此外,有 14 条导管的导管位置被报告为肌肉内,4 条导管的导管位置被报告为皮下。导管尖端与最近的 TP(或 ESP)之间的中位距离为矢状 23.20 毫米,轴向 25.05 毫米:结论:大多数ESP导管在置入后数天内被发现位于筋膜平面表层。导管与 ESP 之间的中位距离在 23 至 25 毫米之间。前瞻性研究应解决导管移位问题,并针对这一常见问题提出解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of catheter position using chest CT in adults undergoing erector spinae plane analgesia for rib fractures: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Continuous erector spinae plane (ESP) analgesia is a common adjuvant for patients with traumatic rib fracture pain and success relies on the ESP catheter remaining within the correct fascial plane for the duration of its placement. However, knowledge on postplacement position of indwelling ESP catheters is largely absent. We hypothesized that migration of over-the-needle ESP catheters was common and detectable with coincidental postprocedure CT.

Methods: In this single-center retrospective cohort study, adults admitted to the surgical intensive care unit for traumatic rib fractures between January 2020 and July 2022 were screened. Those receiving continuous ESP analgesia via indwelling catheter and undergoing subsequent chest CT were included. The primary outcome was the proportion of catheters that migrated outside the ESP. The secondary outcome was the distance between the catheter tip and the nearest transverse process (TP) or fascial plane.

Results: 160 medical records were screened for eligibility and 15 patients (18 catheters) met the inclusion criteria. 16 of 18 catheters reviewed were found outside the ESP. Furthermore, catheter position was reported as intramuscular in 14 catheters and subcutaneous in 4 catheters. The median distance between catheter tip and the nearest TP (or the ESP) was 23.20 mm sagittally and 25.05 mm axially.

Conclusions: Most ESP catheters were found superficial to the fascial plane in the days following their placement. The median distance between the catheter and the ESP is between 23 and 25 mm. Prospective studies should address catheter migration concerns and propose solutions to this common issue.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
175
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine, the official publication of the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine (ASRA), is a monthly journal that publishes peer-reviewed scientific and clinical studies to advance the understanding and clinical application of regional techniques for surgical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. Coverage includes intraoperative regional techniques, perioperative pain, chronic pain, obstetric anesthesia, pediatric anesthesia, outcome studies, and complications. Published for over thirty years, this respected journal also serves as the official publication of the European Society of Regional Anaesthesia and Pain Therapy (ESRA), the Asian and Oceanic Society of Regional Anesthesia (AOSRA), the Latin American Society of Regional Anesthesia (LASRA), the African Society for Regional Anesthesia (AFSRA), and the Academy of Regional Anaesthesia of India (AORA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信