这是一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照递增剂量研究,旨在评估波西泮对早期阿尔茨海默氏症患者的安全性、耐受性、药代动力学 (PK) 和药效学 (PD) 影响。

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Douglas Galasko, Martin R Farlow, Brendan P Lucey, Lawrence S Honig, Donald Elbert, Randall Bateman, Jeremiah Momper, Ronald G Thomas, Robert A Rissman, Judy Pa, Vahan Aslanyan, Archana Balasubramanian, Tim West, Maria Maccecchini, Howard H Feldman
{"title":"这是一项多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照递增剂量研究,旨在评估波西泮对早期阿尔茨海默氏症患者的安全性、耐受性、药代动力学 (PK) 和药效学 (PD) 影响。","authors":"Douglas Galasko, Martin R Farlow, Brendan P Lucey, Lawrence S Honig, Donald Elbert, Randall Bateman, Jeremiah Momper, Ronald G Thomas, Robert A Rissman, Judy Pa, Vahan Aslanyan, Archana Balasubramanian, Tim West, Maria Maccecchini, Howard H Feldman","doi":"10.1186/s13195-024-01490-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amyloid beta protein (Aβ) is a treatment target in Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Lowering production of its parent protein, APP, has benefits in preclinical models. Posiphen, an orally administered small molecule, binds to an iron-responsive element in APP mRNA and decreases translation of APP and Aβ. To augment human data for Posiphen, we evaluated safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects on Aβ metabolism using Stable Isotope Labeling Kinetic (SILK) analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Double-blind phase 1b randomized ascending dose clinical trial, at five sites, under an IRB-approved protocol. Participants with mild cognitive impairment or mild AD (Early AD) confirmed by low CSF Aβ42/40 were randomized (within each dose arm) to Posiphen or placebo. Pretreatment assessment included lumbar puncture for CSF. Participants took Posiphen or placebo for 21-23 days, then underwent CSF catheter placement, intravenous infusion of <sup>13</sup>C<sub>6</sub>-leucine, and CSF sampling for 36 h. Safety and tolerability were assessed through participant reports, EKG and laboratory tests. CSF SILK analysis measured Aβ40, 38 and 42 with immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry. Baseline and day 21 CSF APP, Aβ and other biomarkers were measured with immunoassays. The Mini-Mental State Exam and ADAS-cog12 were given at baseline and day 21.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From June 2017 to December 2021, 19 participants were enrolled, randomized within dose cohorts (5 active: 3 placebo) of 60 mg once/day and 60 mg twice/day; 1 participant was enrolled and completed 60 mg three times/day. 10 active drug and 5 placebo participants completed all study procedures. Posiphen was safe and well-tolerated. 8 participants had headaches related to CSF catheterization; 5 needed blood patches. Prespecified SILK analyses of Fractional Synthesis Rate (FSR) for CSF Aβ40 showed no significant overall or dose-dependent effects of Posiphen vs. placebo. Comprehensive multiparameter modeling of APP kinetics supported dose-dependent lowering of APP production by Posiphen. Cognitive measures and CSF biomarkers did not change significantly from baseline to 21 days in Posiphen vs. placebo groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Posiphen was safe and well-tolerated in Early AD. A multicenter SILK study was feasible. Findings are limited by small sample size but provide additional supportive safety and PK data. Comprehensive modeling of biomarker dynamics using SILK data may reveal subtle drug effects.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT02925650 on clinicaltrials.gov (registered on 10-24-2016).</p>","PeriodicalId":7516,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11225352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled ascending dose study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of Posiphen in subjects with early Alzheimer's Disease.\",\"authors\":\"Douglas Galasko, Martin R Farlow, Brendan P Lucey, Lawrence S Honig, Donald Elbert, Randall Bateman, Jeremiah Momper, Ronald G Thomas, Robert A Rissman, Judy Pa, Vahan Aslanyan, Archana Balasubramanian, Tim West, Maria Maccecchini, Howard H Feldman\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13195-024-01490-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Amyloid beta protein (Aβ) is a treatment target in Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Lowering production of its parent protein, APP, has benefits in preclinical models. Posiphen, an orally administered small molecule, binds to an iron-responsive element in APP mRNA and decreases translation of APP and Aβ. To augment human data for Posiphen, we evaluated safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects on Aβ metabolism using Stable Isotope Labeling Kinetic (SILK) analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Double-blind phase 1b randomized ascending dose clinical trial, at five sites, under an IRB-approved protocol. Participants with mild cognitive impairment or mild AD (Early AD) confirmed by low CSF Aβ42/40 were randomized (within each dose arm) to Posiphen or placebo. Pretreatment assessment included lumbar puncture for CSF. Participants took Posiphen or placebo for 21-23 days, then underwent CSF catheter placement, intravenous infusion of <sup>13</sup>C<sub>6</sub>-leucine, and CSF sampling for 36 h. Safety and tolerability were assessed through participant reports, EKG and laboratory tests. CSF SILK analysis measured Aβ40, 38 and 42 with immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry. Baseline and day 21 CSF APP, Aβ and other biomarkers were measured with immunoassays. The Mini-Mental State Exam and ADAS-cog12 were given at baseline and day 21.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From June 2017 to December 2021, 19 participants were enrolled, randomized within dose cohorts (5 active: 3 placebo) of 60 mg once/day and 60 mg twice/day; 1 participant was enrolled and completed 60 mg three times/day. 10 active drug and 5 placebo participants completed all study procedures. Posiphen was safe and well-tolerated. 8 participants had headaches related to CSF catheterization; 5 needed blood patches. Prespecified SILK analyses of Fractional Synthesis Rate (FSR) for CSF Aβ40 showed no significant overall or dose-dependent effects of Posiphen vs. placebo. Comprehensive multiparameter modeling of APP kinetics supported dose-dependent lowering of APP production by Posiphen. Cognitive measures and CSF biomarkers did not change significantly from baseline to 21 days in Posiphen vs. placebo groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Posiphen was safe and well-tolerated in Early AD. A multicenter SILK study was feasible. Findings are limited by small sample size but provide additional supportive safety and PK data. Comprehensive modeling of biomarker dynamics using SILK data may reveal subtle drug effects.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>NCT02925650 on clinicaltrials.gov (registered on 10-24-2016).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11225352/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01490-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer's Research & Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13195-024-01490-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:淀粉样 beta 蛋白(Aβ)是阿尔茨海默病(AD)的治疗目标。在临床前模型中,降低其母体蛋白APP的产量具有益处。Posiphen是一种口服小分子药物,能与APP mRNA中的铁反应元件结合,减少APP和Aβ的翻译。为了增加Posiphen的人体数据,我们使用稳定同位素标记动力学(SILK)分析评估了其安全性、耐受性以及对Aβ代谢的药代动力学和药效学(PD)影响:双盲 1b 期随机递增剂量临床试验,在五个地点进行,根据 IRB 批准的方案进行。经脑脊液 Aβ42/40 低值证实患有轻度认知障碍或轻度注意力缺失症(早期注意力缺失症)的参与者被随机分配到波西芬或安慰剂组(每个剂量组内)。治疗前评估包括腰椎穿刺采集脑脊液。参试者服用波西芬或安慰剂 21-23 天,然后进行 CSF 导管置入、13C6-亮氨酸静脉输注和 36 小时 CSF 采样。安全性和耐受性通过参试者报告、心电图和实验室检测进行评估。CSF SILK分析采用免疫沉淀质谱法测量Aβ40、38和42。基线和第 21 天 CSF APP、Aβ 及其他生物标记物均通过免疫测定法进行测量。在基线和第21天进行迷你精神状态检查和ADAS-cog12:2017年6月至2021年12月,19名参与者入组,随机分配剂量组群(5名活性药物:3名安慰剂),60毫克一次/天和60毫克两次/天;1名参与者入组并完成了60毫克三次/天的治疗。10 名服用活性药物的参与者和 5 名服用安慰剂的参与者完成了所有研究程序。波西泮安全且耐受性良好。8名参与者出现了与脑脊液导管插入术相关的头痛;5名参与者需要血液贴片。对 CSF Aβ40 的分数合成率 (FSR) 进行的预设 SILK 分析表明,与安慰剂相比,波西泮没有显著的总体效应或剂量依赖效应。APP动力学的综合多参数模型支持波西芬降低APP生成的剂量依赖性。从基线到21天,波西芬组与安慰剂组的认知指标和脑脊液生物标志物没有显著变化:结论:泊西芬对早期AD患者安全且耐受性良好。多中心 SILK 研究是可行的。研究结果受样本量小的限制,但提供了更多支持性安全性和 PK 数据。利用SILK数据对生物标志物动态进行综合建模可能会揭示药物的微妙作用:NCT02925650 on clinicaltrials.gov(注册日期:2016年10月24日)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled ascending dose study to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of Posiphen in subjects with early Alzheimer's Disease.

Background: Amyloid beta protein (Aβ) is a treatment target in Alzheimer's Disease (AD). Lowering production of its parent protein, APP, has benefits in preclinical models. Posiphen, an orally administered small molecule, binds to an iron-responsive element in APP mRNA and decreases translation of APP and Aβ. To augment human data for Posiphen, we evaluated safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PD) effects on Aβ metabolism using Stable Isotope Labeling Kinetic (SILK) analysis.

Methods: Double-blind phase 1b randomized ascending dose clinical trial, at five sites, under an IRB-approved protocol. Participants with mild cognitive impairment or mild AD (Early AD) confirmed by low CSF Aβ42/40 were randomized (within each dose arm) to Posiphen or placebo. Pretreatment assessment included lumbar puncture for CSF. Participants took Posiphen or placebo for 21-23 days, then underwent CSF catheter placement, intravenous infusion of 13C6-leucine, and CSF sampling for 36 h. Safety and tolerability were assessed through participant reports, EKG and laboratory tests. CSF SILK analysis measured Aβ40, 38 and 42 with immunoprecipitation-mass spectrometry. Baseline and day 21 CSF APP, Aβ and other biomarkers were measured with immunoassays. The Mini-Mental State Exam and ADAS-cog12 were given at baseline and day 21.

Results: From June 2017 to December 2021, 19 participants were enrolled, randomized within dose cohorts (5 active: 3 placebo) of 60 mg once/day and 60 mg twice/day; 1 participant was enrolled and completed 60 mg three times/day. 10 active drug and 5 placebo participants completed all study procedures. Posiphen was safe and well-tolerated. 8 participants had headaches related to CSF catheterization; 5 needed blood patches. Prespecified SILK analyses of Fractional Synthesis Rate (FSR) for CSF Aβ40 showed no significant overall or dose-dependent effects of Posiphen vs. placebo. Comprehensive multiparameter modeling of APP kinetics supported dose-dependent lowering of APP production by Posiphen. Cognitive measures and CSF biomarkers did not change significantly from baseline to 21 days in Posiphen vs. placebo groups.

Conclusions: Posiphen was safe and well-tolerated in Early AD. A multicenter SILK study was feasible. Findings are limited by small sample size but provide additional supportive safety and PK data. Comprehensive modeling of biomarker dynamics using SILK data may reveal subtle drug effects.

Trial registration: NCT02925650 on clinicaltrials.gov (registered on 10-24-2016).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy 医学-神经病学
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
3.30%
发文量
172
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer's Research & Therapy is an international peer-reviewed journal that focuses on translational research into Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative diseases. It publishes open-access basic research, clinical trials, drug discovery and development studies, and epidemiologic studies. The journal also includes reviews, viewpoints, commentaries, debates, and reports. All articles published in Alzheimer's Research & Therapy are included in several reputable databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, MEDLINE, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded (Web of Science) and Scopus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信