患者对初级保健中远程医疗服务的满意度。

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Telemedicine and e-Health Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1089/tmj.2024.0363
Talish Razi, Noga Ramot, Yael Wolff Sagy, Ronen Arbel, Michal Shani, Idan Menashe
{"title":"患者对初级保健中远程医疗服务的满意度。","authors":"Talish Razi, Noga Ramot, Yael Wolff Sagy, Ronen Arbel, Michal Shani, Idan Menashe","doi":"10.1089/tmj.2024.0363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Patient satisfaction is an imperative factor in integrating telehealth services as a treatment modality in health care systems. Here, we compared patient satisfaction from telehealth versus in-person health care visits in a large heterogeneous population. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients making telehealth or in-person primary care visits between January 2021 and August 2022. Patient satisfaction with both service types was evaluated using a validated survey. Logistic regression models were employed to assess the association between type of visit (in-person/telehealth) and patient satisfaction (satisfied/unsatisfied) while accounting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. <b>Results:</b> Of the 247,087 surveys included in the study, 86,580 (35%) were answered following telehealth visits. Telehealth visitors were more satisfied than in-person visitors in aspects related to doctor-patient interactions, such as \"courtesy and respect,\" \"attentive listening,\" and \"coherent explanations\" (aOR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.14-1.21; aOR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.12-1.19; aOR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.12-1.18, respectively), and less satisfied in aspects related to indirect services, such as adherence to appointment scheduling, effort required on the part of the patient, and staff cooperation (aOR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93-0.97; aOR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.87-0.91; aOR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.83-0.87, respectively). Importantly, considerably more telehealth visits were delayed (44%) than in-person visits (27%). Adjustment for this factor further strengthened the observed association between telehealth services and patient satisfaction. <b>Conclusions:</b> While telehealth was associated with high levels of satisfaction in doctor-patient interaction, improvements are still needed in indirect services. Addressing issues related to staff cooperation and streamlining processes to reduce delays could improve overall patient satisfaction with telehealth.</p>","PeriodicalId":54434,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine and e-Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient Satisfaction with Telehealth Services in Primary Care.\",\"authors\":\"Talish Razi, Noga Ramot, Yael Wolff Sagy, Ronen Arbel, Michal Shani, Idan Menashe\",\"doi\":\"10.1089/tmj.2024.0363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Patient satisfaction is an imperative factor in integrating telehealth services as a treatment modality in health care systems. Here, we compared patient satisfaction from telehealth versus in-person health care visits in a large heterogeneous population. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients making telehealth or in-person primary care visits between January 2021 and August 2022. Patient satisfaction with both service types was evaluated using a validated survey. Logistic regression models were employed to assess the association between type of visit (in-person/telehealth) and patient satisfaction (satisfied/unsatisfied) while accounting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. <b>Results:</b> Of the 247,087 surveys included in the study, 86,580 (35%) were answered following telehealth visits. Telehealth visitors were more satisfied than in-person visitors in aspects related to doctor-patient interactions, such as \\\"courtesy and respect,\\\" \\\"attentive listening,\\\" and \\\"coherent explanations\\\" (aOR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.14-1.21; aOR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.12-1.19; aOR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.12-1.18, respectively), and less satisfied in aspects related to indirect services, such as adherence to appointment scheduling, effort required on the part of the patient, and staff cooperation (aOR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93-0.97; aOR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.87-0.91; aOR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.83-0.87, respectively). Importantly, considerably more telehealth visits were delayed (44%) than in-person visits (27%). Adjustment for this factor further strengthened the observed association between telehealth services and patient satisfaction. <b>Conclusions:</b> While telehealth was associated with high levels of satisfaction in doctor-patient interaction, improvements are still needed in indirect services. Addressing issues related to staff cooperation and streamlining processes to reduce delays could improve overall patient satisfaction with telehealth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54434,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telemedicine and e-Health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telemedicine and e-Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0363\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine and e-Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2024.0363","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:患者满意度是将远程医疗服务作为一种治疗方式纳入医疗保健系统的必要因素。在此,我们在一个大型异质人群中比较了远程医疗与面对面医疗访问的患者满意度。方法我们对 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 8 月期间接受远程保健或面对面初级保健就诊的患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。患者对两种服务类型的满意度均通过有效调查进行评估。在考虑社会人口学和临床特征的同时,采用逻辑回归模型评估就诊类型(面对面/远程医疗)与患者满意度(满意/不满意)之间的关联。结果:在纳入研究的 247,087 份调查中,有 86,580 份(35%)是在远程医疗就诊后回答的。在与医患互动相关的方面,如 "礼貌和尊重"、"专注倾听 "和 "连贯的解释",远程医疗来访者比面对面来访者更满意(aOR = 1.17,95% CI:1.14-1.21;aOR = 1.16,95% CI:1.12-1.19;aOR = 1.15,95% CI:1.12-1.18)。分别为 1.15,95% CI:1.12-1.18;aOR = 1.15,95% CI:1.12-1.18),而在与间接服务相关的方面,如遵守预约时间安排、患者需要付出的努力以及工作人员的合作方面,满意度较低(分别为 aOR = 0.95,95% CI:0.93-0.97;aOR = 0.89,95% CI:0.87-0.91;aOR = 0.85,95% CI:0.83-0.87)。重要的是,远程医疗就诊延迟率(44%)远高于现场就诊延迟率(27%)。对这一因素的调整进一步加强了所观察到的远程医疗服务与患者满意度之间的关联。结论:虽然远程医疗与高满意度的医患互动有关,但仍需改进间接服务。解决与员工合作相关的问题并简化流程以减少延误,可以提高患者对远程医疗的整体满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient Satisfaction with Telehealth Services in Primary Care.

Objective: Patient satisfaction is an imperative factor in integrating telehealth services as a treatment modality in health care systems. Here, we compared patient satisfaction from telehealth versus in-person health care visits in a large heterogeneous population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients making telehealth or in-person primary care visits between January 2021 and August 2022. Patient satisfaction with both service types was evaluated using a validated survey. Logistic regression models were employed to assess the association between type of visit (in-person/telehealth) and patient satisfaction (satisfied/unsatisfied) while accounting for sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Results: Of the 247,087 surveys included in the study, 86,580 (35%) were answered following telehealth visits. Telehealth visitors were more satisfied than in-person visitors in aspects related to doctor-patient interactions, such as "courtesy and respect," "attentive listening," and "coherent explanations" (aOR = 1.17, 95% CI: 1.14-1.21; aOR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.12-1.19; aOR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.12-1.18, respectively), and less satisfied in aspects related to indirect services, such as adherence to appointment scheduling, effort required on the part of the patient, and staff cooperation (aOR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93-0.97; aOR = 0.89, 95% CI: 0.87-0.91; aOR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.83-0.87, respectively). Importantly, considerably more telehealth visits were delayed (44%) than in-person visits (27%). Adjustment for this factor further strengthened the observed association between telehealth services and patient satisfaction. Conclusions: While telehealth was associated with high levels of satisfaction in doctor-patient interaction, improvements are still needed in indirect services. Addressing issues related to staff cooperation and streamlining processes to reduce delays could improve overall patient satisfaction with telehealth.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telemedicine and e-Health
Telemedicine and e-Health 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
270
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Telemedicine and e-Health is the leading peer-reviewed journal for cutting-edge telemedicine applications for achieving optimal patient care and outcomes. It places special emphasis on the impact of telemedicine on the quality, cost effectiveness, and access to healthcare. Telemedicine applications play an increasingly important role in health care. They offer indispensable tools for home healthcare, remote patient monitoring, and disease management, not only for rural health and battlefield care, but also for nursing home, assisted living facilities, and maritime and aviation settings. Telemedicine and e-Health offers timely coverage of the advances in technology that offer practitioners, medical centers, and hospitals new and innovative options for managing patient care, electronic records, and medical billing.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信