小儿桡骨远端骨折经皮单针固定与双针固定的比较

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Evan W Beatty, Koya Osada, Robert M Zbeda, Donald S Bae
{"title":"小儿桡骨远端骨折经皮单针固定与双针固定的比较","authors":"Evan W Beatty, Koya Osada, Robert M Zbeda, Donald S Bae","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare early clinical and radiographic results of single- versus double-pin fixation of unstable pediatric distal radius fractures. A total of 103 consecutive closed distal radius fractures treated with either single or double percutaneous pinning at a tertiary level I pediatric hospital were analyzed. All patients had open physes and had fractures that failed initial closed reduction and casting. Postoperative fracture displacement was assessed by measuring the difference in angulation of the radius in the anteroposterior and lateral views from intraoperative fluoroscopic images to postoperative radiographs taken on the day of pin removal. Complications were identified from the medical record review. In 103 operative distal radius fractures in 101 patients (70 males, 31 females), 52 and 51 distal radius fractures were treated with single and double pinning, respectively. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] age at the time of surgery was 12.1 (9.0-14.0) years, with the single-pinning group being younger by 1.9 years ( P  < 0.01). Median (IQR) postoperative angulation in the anteroposterior radiograph (coronal plane) was 2° (1-7°) with one pin versus 1° (0-2°) with two pins ( P  < 0.01). Median (IQR) postoperative angulation in the lateral radiograph (sagittal plane) was 3° (1-10°) with one pin versus 1° (0-2°) with two pins ( P  < 0.01). There were no significant differences in complications between the single- and double-pinning groups. Double-pin fixation resulted in a statistically significant, but clinically negligible, reduction in postoperative fracture displacement compared with single-pin fixation. Complication rates were similar in both groups. These findings suggest that either single- or double-pinning techniques can be effective, provided appropriate reduction and postoperative immobilization are achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":50092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","volume":" ","pages":"128-133"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single versus double percutaneous pinning of pediatric distal radius fractures.\",\"authors\":\"Evan W Beatty, Koya Osada, Robert M Zbeda, Donald S Bae\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The aim of this study was to compare early clinical and radiographic results of single- versus double-pin fixation of unstable pediatric distal radius fractures. A total of 103 consecutive closed distal radius fractures treated with either single or double percutaneous pinning at a tertiary level I pediatric hospital were analyzed. All patients had open physes and had fractures that failed initial closed reduction and casting. Postoperative fracture displacement was assessed by measuring the difference in angulation of the radius in the anteroposterior and lateral views from intraoperative fluoroscopic images to postoperative radiographs taken on the day of pin removal. Complications were identified from the medical record review. In 103 operative distal radius fractures in 101 patients (70 males, 31 females), 52 and 51 distal radius fractures were treated with single and double pinning, respectively. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] age at the time of surgery was 12.1 (9.0-14.0) years, with the single-pinning group being younger by 1.9 years ( P  < 0.01). Median (IQR) postoperative angulation in the anteroposterior radiograph (coronal plane) was 2° (1-7°) with one pin versus 1° (0-2°) with two pins ( P  < 0.01). Median (IQR) postoperative angulation in the lateral radiograph (sagittal plane) was 3° (1-10°) with one pin versus 1° (0-2°) with two pins ( P  < 0.01). There were no significant differences in complications between the single- and double-pinning groups. Double-pin fixation resulted in a statistically significant, but clinically negligible, reduction in postoperative fracture displacement compared with single-pin fixation. Complication rates were similar in both groups. These findings suggest that either single- or double-pinning techniques can be effective, provided appropriate reduction and postoperative immobilization are achieved.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50092,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"128-133\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001197\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较不稳定儿科桡骨远端骨折单针固定与双针固定的早期临床和影像学结果。该研究分析了一家三级甲等儿科医院连续采用单针或双针经皮固定治疗的 103 例闭合性桡骨远端骨折。所有患者均为开放性椎体骨折,且最初的闭合复位和石膏固定均告失败。评估术后骨折移位的方法是测量术中透视图像与术后拔针当天拍摄的X光片上桡骨前后侧方角度的差异。并发症通过病历审查确定。在 101 名患者(70 名男性,31 名女性)的 103 例桡骨远端骨折手术中,分别有 52 例和 51 例桡骨远端骨折患者接受了单针和双针治疗。手术时的中位年龄[四分位数间距(IQR)]为12.1(9.0-14.0)岁,单针组年轻1.9岁(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single versus double percutaneous pinning of pediatric distal radius fractures.

The aim of this study was to compare early clinical and radiographic results of single- versus double-pin fixation of unstable pediatric distal radius fractures. A total of 103 consecutive closed distal radius fractures treated with either single or double percutaneous pinning at a tertiary level I pediatric hospital were analyzed. All patients had open physes and had fractures that failed initial closed reduction and casting. Postoperative fracture displacement was assessed by measuring the difference in angulation of the radius in the anteroposterior and lateral views from intraoperative fluoroscopic images to postoperative radiographs taken on the day of pin removal. Complications were identified from the medical record review. In 103 operative distal radius fractures in 101 patients (70 males, 31 females), 52 and 51 distal radius fractures were treated with single and double pinning, respectively. The median [interquartile range (IQR)] age at the time of surgery was 12.1 (9.0-14.0) years, with the single-pinning group being younger by 1.9 years ( P  < 0.01). Median (IQR) postoperative angulation in the anteroposterior radiograph (coronal plane) was 2° (1-7°) with one pin versus 1° (0-2°) with two pins ( P  < 0.01). Median (IQR) postoperative angulation in the lateral radiograph (sagittal plane) was 3° (1-10°) with one pin versus 1° (0-2°) with two pins ( P  < 0.01). There were no significant differences in complications between the single- and double-pinning groups. Double-pin fixation resulted in a statistically significant, but clinically negligible, reduction in postoperative fracture displacement compared with single-pin fixation. Complication rates were similar in both groups. These findings suggest that either single- or double-pinning techniques can be effective, provided appropriate reduction and postoperative immobilization are achieved.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal highlights important recent developments from the world''s leading clinical and research institutions. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric orthopedic disorders. It is the official journal of IFPOS (International Federation of Paediatric Orthopaedic Societies). Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信