布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶 (BTK) 抑制剂 Tolebrutinib 与其他治疗多发性硬化症的 BTK 抑制剂候选药物的中枢神经系统药理学比较。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Drugs in Research & Development Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1007/s40268-024-00468-4
Timothy J Turner, Pricilla Brun, Ross C Gruber, Dimitry Ofengeim
{"title":"布鲁顿酪氨酸激酶 (BTK) 抑制剂 Tolebrutinib 与其他治疗多发性硬化症的 BTK 抑制剂候选药物的中枢神经系统药理学比较。","authors":"Timothy J Turner, Pricilla Brun, Ross C Gruber, Dimitry Ofengeim","doi":"10.1007/s40268-024-00468-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Tolebrutinib is a covalent BTK inhibitor designed and selected for potency and CNS exposure to optimize impact on BTK-dependent signaling in CNS-resident cells. We applied a translational approach to evaluate three BTK inhibitors in Phase 3 clinical development in MS with respect to their relative potency to block BTK-dependent signaling and exposure in the CNS METHODS: We used in vitro kinase and cellular activation assays, alongside pharmacokinetic sampling of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the non-human primate cynomolgus to estimate the ability of these candidates (evobrutinib, fenebrutinib, and tolebrutinib) to block BTK-dependent signaling inside the CNS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In vitro kinase assays demonstrated that tolebrutinib reacted with BTK 65-times faster than evobrutinib, while fenebrutinib, a classical reversible antagonist with a K<sub>i</sub> value of 4.7 nM and slow off-rate (1.54 x 10<sup>-5</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>), also had an association rate 1760-fold slower (0.00245 μM<sup>-1</sup> * s<sup>-1</sup>). Estimates of cellular potency were largely consistent with the in vitro kinase assays, with an estimated IC<sub>50</sub> of 0.7 nM for tolebrutinib against 33.5 nM for evobrutinib and 2.9 nM for fenebrutinib. We then observed that evobrutinib, fenebrutinib, and tolebrutinib achieved similar levels of exposure in non-human primate CSF after oral doses of 10 mg/kg. However, tolebrutinib CSF exposure (4.8 ng/mL) (k<sub>p,uu</sub> CSF=0.40) exceeded the IC90 (the estimated concentration inhibiting 90% of kinase activity) value, while evobrutinib (3.2 ng/mL) (k<sub>p,uu</sub> CSF=0.13) and fenebrutinib (12.9 ng/mL) (kp,uu CSF=0.15) failed to reach the estimated IC<sub>90</sub> values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tolebrutinib was the only candidate of the three that attained relevant CSF exposure in non-human primates.</p>","PeriodicalId":49258,"journal":{"name":"Drugs in Research & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11315827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative CNS Pharmacology of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor Tolebrutinib Versus Other BTK Inhibitor Candidates for Treating Multiple Sclerosis.\",\"authors\":\"Timothy J Turner, Pricilla Brun, Ross C Gruber, Dimitry Ofengeim\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40268-024-00468-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Tolebrutinib is a covalent BTK inhibitor designed and selected for potency and CNS exposure to optimize impact on BTK-dependent signaling in CNS-resident cells. We applied a translational approach to evaluate three BTK inhibitors in Phase 3 clinical development in MS with respect to their relative potency to block BTK-dependent signaling and exposure in the CNS METHODS: We used in vitro kinase and cellular activation assays, alongside pharmacokinetic sampling of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the non-human primate cynomolgus to estimate the ability of these candidates (evobrutinib, fenebrutinib, and tolebrutinib) to block BTK-dependent signaling inside the CNS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In vitro kinase assays demonstrated that tolebrutinib reacted with BTK 65-times faster than evobrutinib, while fenebrutinib, a classical reversible antagonist with a K<sub>i</sub> value of 4.7 nM and slow off-rate (1.54 x 10<sup>-5</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>), also had an association rate 1760-fold slower (0.00245 μM<sup>-1</sup> * s<sup>-1</sup>). Estimates of cellular potency were largely consistent with the in vitro kinase assays, with an estimated IC<sub>50</sub> of 0.7 nM for tolebrutinib against 33.5 nM for evobrutinib and 2.9 nM for fenebrutinib. We then observed that evobrutinib, fenebrutinib, and tolebrutinib achieved similar levels of exposure in non-human primate CSF after oral doses of 10 mg/kg. However, tolebrutinib CSF exposure (4.8 ng/mL) (k<sub>p,uu</sub> CSF=0.40) exceeded the IC90 (the estimated concentration inhibiting 90% of kinase activity) value, while evobrutinib (3.2 ng/mL) (k<sub>p,uu</sub> CSF=0.13) and fenebrutinib (12.9 ng/mL) (kp,uu CSF=0.15) failed to reach the estimated IC<sub>90</sub> values.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tolebrutinib was the only candidate of the three that attained relevant CSF exposure in non-human primates.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49258,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs in Research & Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11315827/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs in Research & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-024-00468-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs in Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40268-024-00468-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的托乐布替尼是一种共价 BTK 抑制剂,其设计和筛选的目的是为了提高效力和中枢神经系统暴露率,从而优化对中枢神经系统驻留细胞中 BTK 依赖性信号转导的影响。我们采用一种转化方法来评估三种处于多发性硬化症 3 期临床开发阶段的 BTK 抑制剂阻断 BTK 依赖性信号转导的相对效力以及在中枢神经系统中的暴露情况:我们使用体外激酶和细胞活化试验以及非人灵长类动物犬脑脊液(CSF)的药代动力学取样来评估这些候选药物(evobrutinib、fenebrutinib和tolebrutinib)阻断中枢神经系统内BTK依赖性信号传导的能力。结果体外激酶测定显示,托乐布替尼与BTK的反应速度是埃沃布罗替尼的65倍,而非尼布替尼是一种经典的可逆性拮抗剂,其Ki值为4.7 nM,脱落速度较慢(1.54 x 10-5 s-1),其结合速度也比埃沃布罗替尼慢1760倍(0.00245 μM-1 * s-1)。细胞效力的估计值与体外激酶检测结果基本一致,托来布替尼的 IC50 估计值为 0.7 nM,而埃沃布替尼为 33.5 nM,非尼布替尼为 2.9 nM。我们随后观察到,在非人灵长类动物CSF中,口服10 mg/kg剂量后,evobrutinib、fenebrutinib和托乐布替尼的暴露水平相似。然而,托乐布替尼CSF暴露量(4.8纳克/毫升)(kp,uu CSF=0.40)超过了IC90(抑制90%激酶活性的估计浓度)值,而evobrutinib(3.2纳克/毫升)(kp,uu CSF=0.13)和fenebrutinib(12.9纳克/毫升)(kp,uu CSF=0.15)未能达到估计的IC90值:结论:托乐布替尼是三种候选药物中唯一能在非人灵长类体内达到相关CSF暴露值的药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparative CNS Pharmacology of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor Tolebrutinib Versus Other BTK Inhibitor Candidates for Treating Multiple Sclerosis.

Comparative CNS Pharmacology of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitor Tolebrutinib Versus Other BTK Inhibitor Candidates for Treating Multiple Sclerosis.

Background and objectives: Tolebrutinib is a covalent BTK inhibitor designed and selected for potency and CNS exposure to optimize impact on BTK-dependent signaling in CNS-resident cells. We applied a translational approach to evaluate three BTK inhibitors in Phase 3 clinical development in MS with respect to their relative potency to block BTK-dependent signaling and exposure in the CNS METHODS: We used in vitro kinase and cellular activation assays, alongside pharmacokinetic sampling of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in the non-human primate cynomolgus to estimate the ability of these candidates (evobrutinib, fenebrutinib, and tolebrutinib) to block BTK-dependent signaling inside the CNS.

Results: In vitro kinase assays demonstrated that tolebrutinib reacted with BTK 65-times faster than evobrutinib, while fenebrutinib, a classical reversible antagonist with a Ki value of 4.7 nM and slow off-rate (1.54 x 10-5 s-1), also had an association rate 1760-fold slower (0.00245 μM-1 * s-1). Estimates of cellular potency were largely consistent with the in vitro kinase assays, with an estimated IC50 of 0.7 nM for tolebrutinib against 33.5 nM for evobrutinib and 2.9 nM for fenebrutinib. We then observed that evobrutinib, fenebrutinib, and tolebrutinib achieved similar levels of exposure in non-human primate CSF after oral doses of 10 mg/kg. However, tolebrutinib CSF exposure (4.8 ng/mL) (kp,uu CSF=0.40) exceeded the IC90 (the estimated concentration inhibiting 90% of kinase activity) value, while evobrutinib (3.2 ng/mL) (kp,uu CSF=0.13) and fenebrutinib (12.9 ng/mL) (kp,uu CSF=0.15) failed to reach the estimated IC90 values.

Conclusions: Tolebrutinib was the only candidate of the three that attained relevant CSF exposure in non-human primates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs in Research & Development
Drugs in Research & Development Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs in R&D is an international, peer reviewed, open access, online only journal, and provides timely information from all phases of drug research and development that will inform clinical practice. Healthcare decision makers are thus provided with knowledge about the developing place of a drug in therapy. The Journal includes: Clinical research on new and established drugs; Preclinical research of direct relevance to clinical drug development; Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered; Reviews may also be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信