关于腿长不一致和全髋关节置换术的多中心调查:术前和术中管理。

Q1 Medicine
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1007/s12306-024-00837-x
Davide Stimolo, Salvatore Lo Giudice, Fabrizio Matassi, Matteo Innocenti, Roberto Civinini, Filippo Boniforti
{"title":"关于腿长不一致和全髋关节置换术的多中心调查:术前和术中管理。","authors":"Davide Stimolo, Salvatore Lo Giudice, Fabrizio Matassi, Matteo Innocenti, Roberto Civinini, Filippo Boniforti","doi":"10.1007/s12306-024-00837-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We created a multicenter survey for Italian orthopedic surgeons on how they approach leg length discrepancy (LLD) when dealing with primary total hip arthroplasty. Aim of the study was to show how surgeons manage LLD and follow the literature recommendations during clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey was composed of 25 questions divided into four sections: 1-surgeon's profile, 2-preoperative and 3-intraoperative evaluation, and 4-postoperative management. In this paper, we report results to answer Sects. 1 and 2. Absolute and relative frequencies of answers to Sects. 2 and 3 are reported. We divided the participants in subgroups based on the \"surgeon's profile\" and evaluated difference in the answers given.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Absolute and relative frequencies demonstrate low agreement among participants in all phases of LLD management. We demonstrated a statistically significant difference based on the surgeon's profile regarding these questions: radiographic measure of LLD depending on working experience, p = 0.008; digital planning based on surgeons' age, p < 0.001, and workplace, p = 0.026; intraoperative anatomical landmarks based on numbers of procedures per year, p = 0.020; and use of intraoperative X-rays based on working experience, p = 0.002.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LLD is a debated topic with no definitive recommendations. Many decisions still depend on tradition and surgeons' preference.</p>","PeriodicalId":18875,"journal":{"name":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","volume":" ","pages":"339-345"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371848/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Multicenter survey about leg length discrepancy and total hip arthroplasty: preoperative and intraoperative management.\",\"authors\":\"Davide Stimolo, Salvatore Lo Giudice, Fabrizio Matassi, Matteo Innocenti, Roberto Civinini, Filippo Boniforti\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12306-024-00837-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We created a multicenter survey for Italian orthopedic surgeons on how they approach leg length discrepancy (LLD) when dealing with primary total hip arthroplasty. Aim of the study was to show how surgeons manage LLD and follow the literature recommendations during clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey was composed of 25 questions divided into four sections: 1-surgeon's profile, 2-preoperative and 3-intraoperative evaluation, and 4-postoperative management. In this paper, we report results to answer Sects. 1 and 2. Absolute and relative frequencies of answers to Sects. 2 and 3 are reported. We divided the participants in subgroups based on the \\\"surgeon's profile\\\" and evaluated difference in the answers given.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Absolute and relative frequencies demonstrate low agreement among participants in all phases of LLD management. We demonstrated a statistically significant difference based on the surgeon's profile regarding these questions: radiographic measure of LLD depending on working experience, p = 0.008; digital planning based on surgeons' age, p < 0.001, and workplace, p = 0.026; intraoperative anatomical landmarks based on numbers of procedures per year, p = 0.020; and use of intraoperative X-rays based on working experience, p = 0.002.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LLD is a debated topic with no definitive recommendations. Many decisions still depend on tradition and surgeons' preference.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"339-345\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11371848/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-024-00837-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12306-024-00837-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们对意大利骨科医生进行了一项多中心调查,了解他们在进行初级全髋关节置换术时如何处理腿长不一致(LLD)问题。该研究旨在展示外科医生在临床实践中如何处理 LLD 并遵循文献建议:调查由 25 个问题组成,分为四个部分:1-外科医生简介;2-术前评估;3-术中评估;4-术后管理。本文报告了对第 1 和第 2 部分的回答结果。1 和 2 的结果。本文报告了回答第 1 和第 2 部分的结果。本文报告了回答第 2 和第 3 部分的绝对频率和相对频率。我们根据 "外科医生特征 "将参与者分为若干小组,并评估了答案的差异:结果:绝对频率和相对频率表明,在 LLD 管理的所有阶段,参与者之间的一致性都很低。结果:绝对频率和相对频率表明,参与者在 LLD 管理的所有阶段的一致性都很低。我们根据外科医生的情况对这些问题进行了统计,结果显示差异显著:LLD 的放射学测量取决于工作经验,p = 0.008;数字规划取决于外科医生的年龄,p 结论:LLD 是一个备受争议的话题,其结果可能会影响患者的生活质量:LLD 是一个备受争议的话题,目前还没有明确的建议。许多决定仍取决于传统和外科医生的偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Multicenter survey about leg length discrepancy and total hip arthroplasty: preoperative and intraoperative management.

Background: We created a multicenter survey for Italian orthopedic surgeons on how they approach leg length discrepancy (LLD) when dealing with primary total hip arthroplasty. Aim of the study was to show how surgeons manage LLD and follow the literature recommendations during clinical practice.

Methods: The survey was composed of 25 questions divided into four sections: 1-surgeon's profile, 2-preoperative and 3-intraoperative evaluation, and 4-postoperative management. In this paper, we report results to answer Sects. 1 and 2. Absolute and relative frequencies of answers to Sects. 2 and 3 are reported. We divided the participants in subgroups based on the "surgeon's profile" and evaluated difference in the answers given.

Results: Absolute and relative frequencies demonstrate low agreement among participants in all phases of LLD management. We demonstrated a statistically significant difference based on the surgeon's profile regarding these questions: radiographic measure of LLD depending on working experience, p = 0.008; digital planning based on surgeons' age, p < 0.001, and workplace, p = 0.026; intraoperative anatomical landmarks based on numbers of procedures per year, p = 0.020; and use of intraoperative X-rays based on working experience, p = 0.002.

Conclusions: LLD is a debated topic with no definitive recommendations. Many decisions still depend on tradition and surgeons' preference.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY
MUSCULOSKELETAL SURGERY Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Musculoskeletal Surgery – Formerly La Chirurgia degli Organi di Movimento, founded in 1917 at the Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, is a peer-reviewed journal published three times a year. The journal provides up-to-date information to clinicians and scientists through the publication of original papers, reviews, case reports, and brief communications dealing with the pathogenesis and treatment of orthopaedic conditions.An electronic version is also available at http://www.springerlink.com.The journal is open for publication of supplements and for publishing abstracts of scientific meetings; conditions can be obtained from the Editors-in-Chief or the Publisher.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信