探索慢性髓性白血病患者的 SARS-CoV-2 感染和疫苗诱导免疫:从巴西和美国的实际数据中获得的启示。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 HEMATOLOGY
Leukemia & Lymphoma Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-05 DOI:10.1080/10428194.2024.2367057
Ana Carolina Mourão Toreli, Marisol Miranda-Galvis, Muhannad Sharara, Marcelo Addas-Carvalho, Eliana Miranda, Leonardo Fechio, Adriana Silva Santos Duarte, Audrey Basso, Gislaine Duarte, Samuel Souza Medina, Fernando Pericole, Bruno Benites, Kimya Jones, Harmanpreet Singh, Jaspreet Farmaha, Ashutosh Vashisht, Ravindra Kolhe, Ashis K Mondal, Sara Teresinha Olalla Saad, Carmino Antonio de Souza, Jorge E Cortes, Katia Pagnano
{"title":"探索慢性髓性白血病患者的 SARS-CoV-2 感染和疫苗诱导免疫:从巴西和美国的实际数据中获得的启示。","authors":"Ana Carolina Mourão Toreli, Marisol Miranda-Galvis, Muhannad Sharara, Marcelo Addas-Carvalho, Eliana Miranda, Leonardo Fechio, Adriana Silva Santos Duarte, Audrey Basso, Gislaine Duarte, Samuel Souza Medina, Fernando Pericole, Bruno Benites, Kimya Jones, Harmanpreet Singh, Jaspreet Farmaha, Ashutosh Vashisht, Ravindra Kolhe, Ashis K Mondal, Sara Teresinha Olalla Saad, Carmino Antonio de Souza, Jorge E Cortes, Katia Pagnano","doi":"10.1080/10428194.2024.2367057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study investigates COVID-19 outcomes and immune response in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, comparing effectiveness of various vaccine options. Data from 118 CML patients (85 in Brazil, 33 in the US) showed similar infection rates prior (14% Brazil, 9.1% US) and post-vaccination (24.7% vs. 27.3%, respectively). In Brazil, AstraZeneca and CoronaVac were the most commonly used vaccine brands, while in the US, Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines dominated. Despite lower seroconversion in the Brazilian cohort, all five vaccine brands analyzed prevented severe COVID-19. Patients who received mRNA and recombinant viral vector vaccines (HR: 2.20; 95%CI 1.07-4.51; <i>p</i> < .031) and those that had achieved at least major molecular response (HR: 1.51; 95% CI 1.01-3.31; <i>p</i> < .0001) showed higher seroconversion rates. Our findings suggest that CML patients can generate antibody responses regardless of the vaccine brand, thereby mitigating severe COVID-19. This effect is more pronounced in patients with well-controlled disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":18047,"journal":{"name":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccine-induced immunity in chronic myeloid leukemia patients: insights from real-world data in Brazil and the United States.\",\"authors\":\"Ana Carolina Mourão Toreli, Marisol Miranda-Galvis, Muhannad Sharara, Marcelo Addas-Carvalho, Eliana Miranda, Leonardo Fechio, Adriana Silva Santos Duarte, Audrey Basso, Gislaine Duarte, Samuel Souza Medina, Fernando Pericole, Bruno Benites, Kimya Jones, Harmanpreet Singh, Jaspreet Farmaha, Ashutosh Vashisht, Ravindra Kolhe, Ashis K Mondal, Sara Teresinha Olalla Saad, Carmino Antonio de Souza, Jorge E Cortes, Katia Pagnano\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10428194.2024.2367057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study investigates COVID-19 outcomes and immune response in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, comparing effectiveness of various vaccine options. Data from 118 CML patients (85 in Brazil, 33 in the US) showed similar infection rates prior (14% Brazil, 9.1% US) and post-vaccination (24.7% vs. 27.3%, respectively). In Brazil, AstraZeneca and CoronaVac were the most commonly used vaccine brands, while in the US, Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines dominated. Despite lower seroconversion in the Brazilian cohort, all five vaccine brands analyzed prevented severe COVID-19. Patients who received mRNA and recombinant viral vector vaccines (HR: 2.20; 95%CI 1.07-4.51; <i>p</i> < .031) and those that had achieved at least major molecular response (HR: 1.51; 95% CI 1.01-3.31; <i>p</i> < .0001) showed higher seroconversion rates. Our findings suggest that CML patients can generate antibody responses regardless of the vaccine brand, thereby mitigating severe COVID-19. This effect is more pronounced in patients with well-controlled disease.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18047,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Leukemia & Lymphoma\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Leukemia & Lymphoma\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2024.2367057\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/5 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Leukemia & Lymphoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2024.2367057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了慢性髓性白血病(CML)患者接种 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗后 COVID-19 的结果和免疫反应,比较了各种疫苗方案的效果。118 名 CML 患者(巴西 85 人,美国 33 人)的数据显示,接种前(巴西 14%,美国 9.1%)和接种后(分别为 24.7% 和 27.3%)的感染率相似。在巴西,阿斯利康和 CoronaVac 是最常用的疫苗品牌,而在美国,Moderna 和辉瑞生物技术公司的疫苗则占主导地位。尽管巴西队列中的血清转换率较低,但分析的所有五个疫苗品牌都能预防严重的 COVID-19。接种 mRNA 和重组病毒载体疫苗的患者(HR:2.20;95%CI 1.07-4.51;P P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccine-induced immunity in chronic myeloid leukemia patients: insights from real-world data in Brazil and the United States.

This study investigates COVID-19 outcomes and immune response in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients post-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, comparing effectiveness of various vaccine options. Data from 118 CML patients (85 in Brazil, 33 in the US) showed similar infection rates prior (14% Brazil, 9.1% US) and post-vaccination (24.7% vs. 27.3%, respectively). In Brazil, AstraZeneca and CoronaVac were the most commonly used vaccine brands, while in the US, Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech vaccines dominated. Despite lower seroconversion in the Brazilian cohort, all five vaccine brands analyzed prevented severe COVID-19. Patients who received mRNA and recombinant viral vector vaccines (HR: 2.20; 95%CI 1.07-4.51; p < .031) and those that had achieved at least major molecular response (HR: 1.51; 95% CI 1.01-3.31; p < .0001) showed higher seroconversion rates. Our findings suggest that CML patients can generate antibody responses regardless of the vaccine brand, thereby mitigating severe COVID-19. This effect is more pronounced in patients with well-controlled disease.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Leukemia & Lymphoma
Leukemia & Lymphoma 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.80%
发文量
384
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: Leukemia & Lymphoma in its fourth decade continues to provide an international forum for publication of high quality clinical, translational, and basic science research, and original observations relating to all aspects of hematological malignancies. The scope ranges from clinical and clinico-pathological investigations to fundamental research in disease biology, mechanisms of action of novel agents, development of combination chemotherapy, pharmacology and pharmacogenomics as well as ethics and epidemiology. Submissions of unique clinical observations or confirmatory studies are considered and published as Letters to the Editor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信