Preserflo 微分流术后前段结构性 OCT 生物标志物与出血血管密度和手术成功率无相关性

Martin Kallab, Sarah Hinterberger, Sophie Schneider, Olivia Murauer, Anna-Sophie Reisinger, Susanne Strohmaier, Alex S. Huang, Matthias Bolz, Clemens A. Strohmaier
{"title":"Preserflo 微分流术后前段结构性 OCT 生物标志物与出血血管密度和手术成功率无相关性","authors":"Martin Kallab, Sarah Hinterberger, Sophie Schneider, Olivia Murauer, Anna-Sophie Reisinger, Susanne Strohmaier, Alex S. Huang, Matthias Bolz, Clemens A. Strohmaier","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.30.24309720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose\nTo evaluate anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) parameters of bleb wall thickness (BWT) and total bleb height (TBH) in the early postoperative phase after Preserflo Microshunt (PM) implantation for their correlation to (a) surgical revision and (b) AS-OCT angiography (AS-OCTA) derived bleb vessel density (BVD). Methods\nA total of 23 patients with pharmacologically uncontrolled open angle glaucoma were studied. Post-operatively (at 1, 2, and 4 weeks and 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months) AS-OCT measurements of BWT/TBH and AS-OCTA measurements of BVD were acquired. Surgical revisions (needling or open revision) were recorded. Correlations of BWT and TBH to (a) need for surgical revision and to (b) BVD were assessed. Results\nIn 10 of 23 patients, surgical revisions were performed 4 to 48 weeks after PM implantation. At 1, 2, and 4 weeks after surgery neither BWT nor TBH were significantly associated with future surgical revisions (BWT/TBH p-values: 1W 0.217/0.878, 2W 0.670/0.528, 4W 0.171/0.430). No correlations between BWT or TBH and BVD were found for any evaluated timepoint (1W, 2W, 4W). Conclusions\nStructural AS-OCT parameters were not predictive of the need for surgical revision after PM implantation. Consistent with this finding, these parameters were also not correlated with AS-OCTA derived BVD, which was shown to be a good biomarker for failure in a previous analysis. The discrepancy to similar studies after trabeculectomy may be due to bleb drainage differences between TE and PM. BVD seems to be a better predictor of surgical revision after PM implantation than BWT/TBH.","PeriodicalId":501390,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No Correlation of Structural Anterior-Segment OCT Biomarkers with Bleb Vessel Density and Surgical Success after Preserflo Microshunt Implantation\",\"authors\":\"Martin Kallab, Sarah Hinterberger, Sophie Schneider, Olivia Murauer, Anna-Sophie Reisinger, Susanne Strohmaier, Alex S. Huang, Matthias Bolz, Clemens A. Strohmaier\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.06.30.24309720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose\\nTo evaluate anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) parameters of bleb wall thickness (BWT) and total bleb height (TBH) in the early postoperative phase after Preserflo Microshunt (PM) implantation for their correlation to (a) surgical revision and (b) AS-OCT angiography (AS-OCTA) derived bleb vessel density (BVD). Methods\\nA total of 23 patients with pharmacologically uncontrolled open angle glaucoma were studied. Post-operatively (at 1, 2, and 4 weeks and 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months) AS-OCT measurements of BWT/TBH and AS-OCTA measurements of BVD were acquired. Surgical revisions (needling or open revision) were recorded. Correlations of BWT and TBH to (a) need for surgical revision and to (b) BVD were assessed. Results\\nIn 10 of 23 patients, surgical revisions were performed 4 to 48 weeks after PM implantation. At 1, 2, and 4 weeks after surgery neither BWT nor TBH were significantly associated with future surgical revisions (BWT/TBH p-values: 1W 0.217/0.878, 2W 0.670/0.528, 4W 0.171/0.430). No correlations between BWT or TBH and BVD were found for any evaluated timepoint (1W, 2W, 4W). Conclusions\\nStructural AS-OCT parameters were not predictive of the need for surgical revision after PM implantation. Consistent with this finding, these parameters were also not correlated with AS-OCTA derived BVD, which was shown to be a good biomarker for failure in a previous analysis. The discrepancy to similar studies after trabeculectomy may be due to bleb drainage differences between TE and PM. BVD seems to be a better predictor of surgical revision after PM implantation than BWT/TBH.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501390,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.30.24309720\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.30.24309720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的评估 Preserflo 微分流术(PM)植入术后早期的虹膜壁厚度(BWT)和虹膜总高度(TBH)的前节光学相干断层成像(AS-OCT)参数与(a)手术修正和(b)AS-OCT 血管造影(AS-OCTA)得出的虹膜血管密度(BVD)的相关性。方法共研究了 23 名药物无法控制的开角型青光眼患者。术后(1、2、4 周和 2、3、6、9、12 个月)采集了 BWT/TBH 的 AS-OCT 测量值和 BVD 的 AS-OCTA 测量值。记录手术翻修(针刺或开放翻修)情况。评估 BWT 和 TBH 与 (a) 手术翻修需求和 (b) BVD 的相关性。结果 23例患者中有10例在PM植入后4至48周进行了手术翻修。术后 1、2 和 4 周,BWT 和 TBH 均与未来的手术翻修无显著关联(BWT/TBH p 值:1W 0.217/0.878、2W 0.670/0.528、4W 0.171/0.430)。在所有评估的时间点(1W、2W、4W)上,均未发现 BWT 或 TBH 与 BVD 之间的相关性。结论AS-OCT结构参数不能预测PM植入后是否需要手术翻修。与这一发现相一致的是,这些参数也与 AS-OCTA 导出的 BVD 无关,而在之前的分析中,BVD 被证明是失败的良好生物标志物。与小梁切除术后类似研究的差异可能是由于 TE 和 PM 的眼泡引流不同。与 BWT/TBH 相比,BVD 似乎是 PM 植入术后手术翻修的更好预测指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No Correlation of Structural Anterior-Segment OCT Biomarkers with Bleb Vessel Density and Surgical Success after Preserflo Microshunt Implantation
Purpose To evaluate anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT) parameters of bleb wall thickness (BWT) and total bleb height (TBH) in the early postoperative phase after Preserflo Microshunt (PM) implantation for their correlation to (a) surgical revision and (b) AS-OCT angiography (AS-OCTA) derived bleb vessel density (BVD). Methods A total of 23 patients with pharmacologically uncontrolled open angle glaucoma were studied. Post-operatively (at 1, 2, and 4 weeks and 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months) AS-OCT measurements of BWT/TBH and AS-OCTA measurements of BVD were acquired. Surgical revisions (needling or open revision) were recorded. Correlations of BWT and TBH to (a) need for surgical revision and to (b) BVD were assessed. Results In 10 of 23 patients, surgical revisions were performed 4 to 48 weeks after PM implantation. At 1, 2, and 4 weeks after surgery neither BWT nor TBH were significantly associated with future surgical revisions (BWT/TBH p-values: 1W 0.217/0.878, 2W 0.670/0.528, 4W 0.171/0.430). No correlations between BWT or TBH and BVD were found for any evaluated timepoint (1W, 2W, 4W). Conclusions Structural AS-OCT parameters were not predictive of the need for surgical revision after PM implantation. Consistent with this finding, these parameters were also not correlated with AS-OCTA derived BVD, which was shown to be a good biomarker for failure in a previous analysis. The discrepancy to similar studies after trabeculectomy may be due to bleb drainage differences between TE and PM. BVD seems to be a better predictor of surgical revision after PM implantation than BWT/TBH.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信