通货膨胀削减法》的最高公平价格会损害患者利益吗?

Esteban Rivera, Anne M Sydor, Robert Popovian
{"title":"通货膨胀削减法》的最高公平价格会损害患者利益吗?","authors":"Esteban Rivera, Anne M Sydor, Robert Popovian","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.26.24309544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Background</strong>\nThe Inflation Reduction Act′s Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program allows the federal government to negotiate caps for select medications. These price caps may reduce revenue for the pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) that negotiate the actual price paid for medicines in the US. To offset the resulting pressure on their profit margins, it is possible that PBMs would, in turn, increase patient′s out-of-pocket costs for medicines with capped prices. The model presented here evaluates how such increased out-of-pocket costs for the anticoagulants Eliquis (apixaban) and Xarelto (rivaroxaban) could impact patients financially and clinically. <strong>Methods</strong>\nCopay distributions for all 2023 prescription fills for Eliquis and Xarelto managed by the three largest PBMs were used to approximate current copay costs. Increased out-of-pocket costs were modeled as a shift of all Eliquis and Xarelto prescriptions to the highest copay tier. The known linear relationship between copay costs and treatment abandonment was used to calculate the potential resulting increase in treatment abandonment. Known rates of morbidity and mortality due to abandoning anticoagulants were used to estimate resulting increases in morbidity and mortality.\n<strong>Results</strong>\nIf the three largest PBMs all shifted costs onto patients by moving all Eliquis and Xarelto prescriptions to the highest formulary tier, Tier 6, patients′ copay amount would increase by $235 to $482 million for Eliquis and $105 to $206 million for Xarelto. Such an increase could lead to 169,000 to 228,000 patients abandoning Eliquis and 71,000 to 93,000 abandoning Xarelto. The resulting morbidity and mortality could include up to an additional 145,000 major cardiovascular events and up to 97,000 more deaths.\n<strong>Conclusion</strong>\nThe Medicare Price Negotiation Program could impact patients negatively if it causes PBMs to increase patients′ out-of-pocket costs for medicines. Policymakers should closely monitor changes in overall affordability, including all patient out-of-pocket expenditures, for medications in the program. Preemptive measures to ensure that the most vulnerable citizens are not placed in precarious situations leading to poorer health outcomes should be considered.","PeriodicalId":501386,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Policy","volume":"32 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Could the Inflation Reduction Act Maximum Fair Price Hurt Patients?\",\"authors\":\"Esteban Rivera, Anne M Sydor, Robert Popovian\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.06.26.24309544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<strong>Background</strong>\\nThe Inflation Reduction Act′s Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program allows the federal government to negotiate caps for select medications. These price caps may reduce revenue for the pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) that negotiate the actual price paid for medicines in the US. To offset the resulting pressure on their profit margins, it is possible that PBMs would, in turn, increase patient′s out-of-pocket costs for medicines with capped prices. The model presented here evaluates how such increased out-of-pocket costs for the anticoagulants Eliquis (apixaban) and Xarelto (rivaroxaban) could impact patients financially and clinically. <strong>Methods</strong>\\nCopay distributions for all 2023 prescription fills for Eliquis and Xarelto managed by the three largest PBMs were used to approximate current copay costs. Increased out-of-pocket costs were modeled as a shift of all Eliquis and Xarelto prescriptions to the highest copay tier. The known linear relationship between copay costs and treatment abandonment was used to calculate the potential resulting increase in treatment abandonment. Known rates of morbidity and mortality due to abandoning anticoagulants were used to estimate resulting increases in morbidity and mortality.\\n<strong>Results</strong>\\nIf the three largest PBMs all shifted costs onto patients by moving all Eliquis and Xarelto prescriptions to the highest formulary tier, Tier 6, patients′ copay amount would increase by $235 to $482 million for Eliquis and $105 to $206 million for Xarelto. Such an increase could lead to 169,000 to 228,000 patients abandoning Eliquis and 71,000 to 93,000 abandoning Xarelto. The resulting morbidity and mortality could include up to an additional 145,000 major cardiovascular events and up to 97,000 more deaths.\\n<strong>Conclusion</strong>\\nThe Medicare Price Negotiation Program could impact patients negatively if it causes PBMs to increase patients′ out-of-pocket costs for medicines. Policymakers should closely monitor changes in overall affordability, including all patient out-of-pocket expenditures, for medications in the program. Preemptive measures to ensure that the most vulnerable citizens are not placed in precarious situations leading to poorer health outcomes should be considered.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501386,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.26.24309544\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.26.24309544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景《通胀削减法》中的医疗保险药品价格谈判计划允许联邦政府就特定药品的价格上限进行谈判。这些价格上限可能会减少负责谈判美国药品实际支付价格的药房福利管理公司(PBM)的收入。为了抵消由此对其利润率造成的压力,药房福利管理公司有可能反过来增加患者对有价格上限的药品的自付费用。本文介绍的模型评估了抗凝药物 Eliquis(阿哌沙班)和 Xarelto(利伐沙班)自付费用的增加会对患者的经济和临床产生怎样的影响。方法使用三大 PBM 管理的 2023 年所有 Eliquis 和 Xarelto 处方的共付额分布来估算当前的共付额成本。自付费用的增加被模拟为所有 Eliquis 和 Xarelto 处方向最高共付额层级的转移。共付额成本与放弃治疗之间的已知线性关系被用来计算可能导致的放弃治疗率的增加。结果如果三家最大的 PBM 将所有的 Eliquis 和 Xarelto 处方转移到处方集最高级别(第 6 级),从而将成本转嫁给患者,那么患者的共付额将分别增加:Eliquis 2.35 亿美元至 4.82 亿美元,Xarelto 1.05 亿美元至 2.06 亿美元。这种增加可能导致 16.9 万至 22.8 万名患者放弃 Eliquis,7.1 万至 9.3 万名患者放弃 Xarelto。由此导致的发病率和死亡率可能会增加 14.5 万例重大心血管事件,死亡人数可能会增加 9.7 万。政策制定者应密切关注总体可负担性的变化,包括该计划中药物的所有患者自付费用。应考虑采取先发制人的措施,确保最弱势的公民不会陷入危险境地,导致健康状况恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Could the Inflation Reduction Act Maximum Fair Price Hurt Patients?
Background The Inflation Reduction Act′s Medicare Drug Price Negotiation Program allows the federal government to negotiate caps for select medications. These price caps may reduce revenue for the pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) that negotiate the actual price paid for medicines in the US. To offset the resulting pressure on their profit margins, it is possible that PBMs would, in turn, increase patient′s out-of-pocket costs for medicines with capped prices. The model presented here evaluates how such increased out-of-pocket costs for the anticoagulants Eliquis (apixaban) and Xarelto (rivaroxaban) could impact patients financially and clinically. Methods Copay distributions for all 2023 prescription fills for Eliquis and Xarelto managed by the three largest PBMs were used to approximate current copay costs. Increased out-of-pocket costs were modeled as a shift of all Eliquis and Xarelto prescriptions to the highest copay tier. The known linear relationship between copay costs and treatment abandonment was used to calculate the potential resulting increase in treatment abandonment. Known rates of morbidity and mortality due to abandoning anticoagulants were used to estimate resulting increases in morbidity and mortality. Results If the three largest PBMs all shifted costs onto patients by moving all Eliquis and Xarelto prescriptions to the highest formulary tier, Tier 6, patients′ copay amount would increase by $235 to $482 million for Eliquis and $105 to $206 million for Xarelto. Such an increase could lead to 169,000 to 228,000 patients abandoning Eliquis and 71,000 to 93,000 abandoning Xarelto. The resulting morbidity and mortality could include up to an additional 145,000 major cardiovascular events and up to 97,000 more deaths. Conclusion The Medicare Price Negotiation Program could impact patients negatively if it causes PBMs to increase patients′ out-of-pocket costs for medicines. Policymakers should closely monitor changes in overall affordability, including all patient out-of-pocket expenditures, for medications in the program. Preemptive measures to ensure that the most vulnerable citizens are not placed in precarious situations leading to poorer health outcomes should be considered.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信