{"title":"复杂性科学中的三个误区及其破解之道","authors":"Casper van Elteren","doi":"arxiv-2407.01762","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From bird flocking to neural dynamics, complex systems generate fascinating\nstructures and correlations. Often, seemingly simple dynamics lead to intricate\nemergent properties. Despite their visceral appeal, defining complex systems\nlacks universal agreement. In this paper, I will debunk three prevalent myths\nin complex systems and propose resolutions. This work contributes by offering a\ncontemporary interpretation of complex systems, presenting essential\ndefinitions that benefit complexity scientists.","PeriodicalId":501042,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three Myths in Complexity Science and How to Resolve Them\",\"authors\":\"Casper van Elteren\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2407.01762\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From bird flocking to neural dynamics, complex systems generate fascinating\\nstructures and correlations. Often, seemingly simple dynamics lead to intricate\\nemergent properties. Despite their visceral appeal, defining complex systems\\nlacks universal agreement. In this paper, I will debunk three prevalent myths\\nin complex systems and propose resolutions. This work contributes by offering a\\ncontemporary interpretation of complex systems, presenting essential\\ndefinitions that benefit complexity scientists.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.01762\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.01762","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Three Myths in Complexity Science and How to Resolve Them
From bird flocking to neural dynamics, complex systems generate fascinating
structures and correlations. Often, seemingly simple dynamics lead to intricate
emergent properties. Despite their visceral appeal, defining complex systems
lacks universal agreement. In this paper, I will debunk three prevalent myths
in complex systems and propose resolutions. This work contributes by offering a
contemporary interpretation of complex systems, presenting essential
definitions that benefit complexity scientists.