测量含有各种添加剂的土壤表层施用泥浆中氨损失的 15N 质量平衡技术

IF 2.6 3区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Urs Schmidhalter
{"title":"测量含有各种添加剂的土壤表层施用泥浆中氨损失的 15N 质量平衡技术","authors":"Urs Schmidhalter","doi":"10.1002/jpln.202400235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Anthropogenic ammonia emissions, primarily derived from agriculture, lead to air pollution, soil acidification, and surface water eutrophication, all of which adversely affect human health and ecosystems. Slurry treatment technologies in the form of additives represent an underutilized means of reducing gaseous emissions. Information regarding the potential of additives to reduce ammonia in soil surface-applied slurries is scarce.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to develop a <sup>15</sup>N mass balance technique to quantitatively measure ammonia losses from different slurries containing multiple additives that are applied to outdoor soil-filled containers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The experiments were performed under free-air conditions. Isotopically labeled slurries from biogas, cattle, and pigs containing 18 additives were surface-applied to soil-filled containers and exposed for 72 or 48 h. The additives included inorganic and organic adsorbents, five amounts of sulfuric acids, molasses ± effective microorganisms, and water dilution. After termination of the ammonia loss period, a suite of soil preparation steps for the quantitative recovery of the labeled ammonium remaining in the soil was developed, and subsequently the loss of NH<sub>4</sub>-N was determined.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In the control treatments, ammonia losses from biogas, cattle slurries, and pig slurries averaged 54.4%, 33.9%, and 11.0%, respectively. The adsorbents did not decrease or only slightly decreased ammonia emissions. Ammonia abatement by sulfuric acid was nearly complete at pH values of 5.9 and 5.8 for the biogas and pig slurry, respectively, and about 80% at pH 5.2 for the cattle slurry. In comparison, more moderately decreased pH values with sulfuric acid showed a similar reduction as molasses and a 1:1 dilution for the three slurries. Adding microorganisms to the molasses did not further decrease ammonia losses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The newly developed <sup>15</sup>N mass balance technique, which allows a precise estimate of ammonia losses, can serve as a reference method to assess ammonia losses from field-applied slurries containing various additives and as a standard comparison technique for other ammonia measurement techniques.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16802,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science","volume":"187 4","pages":"443-453"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jpln.202400235","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"15N mass balance technique for measuring ammonia losses from soil surface-applied slurries containing various additives\",\"authors\":\"Urs Schmidhalter\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jpln.202400235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Anthropogenic ammonia emissions, primarily derived from agriculture, lead to air pollution, soil acidification, and surface water eutrophication, all of which adversely affect human health and ecosystems. Slurry treatment technologies in the form of additives represent an underutilized means of reducing gaseous emissions. Information regarding the potential of additives to reduce ammonia in soil surface-applied slurries is scarce.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aims to develop a <sup>15</sup>N mass balance technique to quantitatively measure ammonia losses from different slurries containing multiple additives that are applied to outdoor soil-filled containers.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The experiments were performed under free-air conditions. Isotopically labeled slurries from biogas, cattle, and pigs containing 18 additives were surface-applied to soil-filled containers and exposed for 72 or 48 h. The additives included inorganic and organic adsorbents, five amounts of sulfuric acids, molasses ± effective microorganisms, and water dilution. After termination of the ammonia loss period, a suite of soil preparation steps for the quantitative recovery of the labeled ammonium remaining in the soil was developed, and subsequently the loss of NH<sub>4</sub>-N was determined.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the control treatments, ammonia losses from biogas, cattle slurries, and pig slurries averaged 54.4%, 33.9%, and 11.0%, respectively. The adsorbents did not decrease or only slightly decreased ammonia emissions. Ammonia abatement by sulfuric acid was nearly complete at pH values of 5.9 and 5.8 for the biogas and pig slurry, respectively, and about 80% at pH 5.2 for the cattle slurry. In comparison, more moderately decreased pH values with sulfuric acid showed a similar reduction as molasses and a 1:1 dilution for the three slurries. Adding microorganisms to the molasses did not further decrease ammonia losses.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The newly developed <sup>15</sup>N mass balance technique, which allows a precise estimate of ammonia losses, can serve as a reference method to assess ammonia losses from field-applied slurries containing various additives and as a standard comparison technique for other ammonia measurement techniques.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16802,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science\",\"volume\":\"187 4\",\"pages\":\"443-453\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jpln.202400235\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jpln.202400235\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jpln.202400235","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景主要来自农业的人为氨排放会导致空气污染、土壤酸化和地表水富营养化,所有这些都会对人类健康和生态系统产生不利影响。添加剂形式的泥浆处理技术是一种未得到充分利用的减少气体排放的手段。本研究旨在开发一种 15N 质量平衡技术,以定量测量施用到室外装满土壤的容器中含有多种添加剂的不同泥浆的氨损失。添加剂包括无机和有机吸附剂、五种硫酸、糖蜜 ± 有效微生物和稀释水。结果在对照处理中,沼气、牛粪浆和猪粪浆的氨损失平均分别为 54.4%、33.9% 和 11.0%。吸附剂没有减少或仅略微减少了氨的排放。沼气和猪粪浆的 pH 值分别为 5.9 和 5.8 时,硫酸的氨减排效果接近完全,而牛粪浆的 pH 值为 5.2 时,氨减排效果约为 80%。相比之下,在三种泥浆中,用硫酸降低 pH 值的幅度较小,与糖蜜和 1:1 稀释液的降低幅度相似。结论新开发的 15N 质量平衡技术可精确估算氨损失,可作为评估含有各种添加剂的现场施用泥浆中氨损失的参考方法,也可作为其他氨测量技术的标准比较技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

15N mass balance technique for measuring ammonia losses from soil surface-applied slurries containing various additives

15N mass balance technique for measuring ammonia losses from soil surface-applied slurries containing various additives

Background

Anthropogenic ammonia emissions, primarily derived from agriculture, lead to air pollution, soil acidification, and surface water eutrophication, all of which adversely affect human health and ecosystems. Slurry treatment technologies in the form of additives represent an underutilized means of reducing gaseous emissions. Information regarding the potential of additives to reduce ammonia in soil surface-applied slurries is scarce.

Aim

This study aims to develop a 15N mass balance technique to quantitatively measure ammonia losses from different slurries containing multiple additives that are applied to outdoor soil-filled containers.

Methods

The experiments were performed under free-air conditions. Isotopically labeled slurries from biogas, cattle, and pigs containing 18 additives were surface-applied to soil-filled containers and exposed for 72 or 48 h. The additives included inorganic and organic adsorbents, five amounts of sulfuric acids, molasses ± effective microorganisms, and water dilution. After termination of the ammonia loss period, a suite of soil preparation steps for the quantitative recovery of the labeled ammonium remaining in the soil was developed, and subsequently the loss of NH4-N was determined.

Results

In the control treatments, ammonia losses from biogas, cattle slurries, and pig slurries averaged 54.4%, 33.9%, and 11.0%, respectively. The adsorbents did not decrease or only slightly decreased ammonia emissions. Ammonia abatement by sulfuric acid was nearly complete at pH values of 5.9 and 5.8 for the biogas and pig slurry, respectively, and about 80% at pH 5.2 for the cattle slurry. In comparison, more moderately decreased pH values with sulfuric acid showed a similar reduction as molasses and a 1:1 dilution for the three slurries. Adding microorganisms to the molasses did not further decrease ammonia losses.

Conclusion

The newly developed 15N mass balance technique, which allows a precise estimate of ammonia losses, can serve as a reference method to assess ammonia losses from field-applied slurries containing various additives and as a standard comparison technique for other ammonia measurement techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1922, the Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science (JPNSS) is an international peer-reviewed journal devoted to cover the entire spectrum of plant nutrition and soil science from different scale units, e.g. agroecosystem to natural systems. With its wide scope and focus on soil-plant interactions, JPNSS is one of the leading journals on this topic. Articles in JPNSS include reviews, high-standard original papers, and short communications and represent challenging research of international significance. The Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science is one of the world’s oldest journals. You can trust in a peer-reviewed journal that has been established in the plant and soil science community for almost 100 years. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science (ISSN 1436-8730) is published in six volumes per year, by the German Societies of Plant Nutrition (DGP) and Soil Science (DBG). Furthermore, the Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science (JPNSS) is a Cooperating Journal of the International Union of Soil Science (IUSS). The journal is produced by Wiley-VCH. Topical Divisions of the Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science that are receiving increasing attention are: JPNSS – Topical Divisions Special timely focus in interdisciplinarity: - sustainability & critical zone science. Soil-Plant Interactions: - rhizosphere science & soil ecology - pollutant cycling & plant-soil protection - land use & climate change. Soil Science: - soil chemistry & soil physics - soil biology & biogeochemistry - soil genesis & mineralogy. Plant Nutrition: - plant nutritional physiology - nutrient dynamics & soil fertility - ecophysiological aspects of plant nutrition.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信