Nick Haupka, Jack H. Culbert, Alexander Schniedermann, Najko Jahn, Philipp Mayr
{"title":"对 OpenAlex、Web of Science、Scopus、Pubmed 和 Semantic Scholar 中的出版物和文件类型的分析","authors":"Nick Haupka, Jack H. Culbert, Alexander Schniedermann, Najko Jahn, Philipp Mayr","doi":"arxiv-2406.15154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compares and analyses publication and document types in the\nfollowing bibliographic databases: OpenAlex, Scopus, Web of Science, Semantic\nScholar and PubMed. The results demonstrate that typologies can differ\nconsiderably between individual database providers. Moreover, the distinction\nbetween research and non-research texts, which is required to identify relevant\ndocuments for bibliometric analysis, can vary depending on the data source\nbecause publications are classified differently in the respective databases.\nThe focus of this study, in addition to the cross-database comparison, is\nprimarily on the coverage and analysis of the publication and document types\ncontained in OpenAlex, as OpenAlex is becoming increasingly important as a free\nalternative to established proprietary providers for bibliometric analyses at\nlibraries and universities.","PeriodicalId":501285,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the Publication and Document Types in OpenAlex, Web of Science, Scopus, Pubmed and Semantic Scholar\",\"authors\":\"Nick Haupka, Jack H. Culbert, Alexander Schniedermann, Najko Jahn, Philipp Mayr\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2406.15154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study compares and analyses publication and document types in the\\nfollowing bibliographic databases: OpenAlex, Scopus, Web of Science, Semantic\\nScholar and PubMed. The results demonstrate that typologies can differ\\nconsiderably between individual database providers. Moreover, the distinction\\nbetween research and non-research texts, which is required to identify relevant\\ndocuments for bibliometric analysis, can vary depending on the data source\\nbecause publications are classified differently in the respective databases.\\nThe focus of this study, in addition to the cross-database comparison, is\\nprimarily on the coverage and analysis of the publication and document types\\ncontained in OpenAlex, as OpenAlex is becoming increasingly important as a free\\nalternative to established proprietary providers for bibliometric analyses at\\nlibraries and universities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2406.15154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Digital Libraries","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2406.15154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究对以下书目数据库中的出版物和文件类型进行了比较和分析:OpenAlex、Scopus、Web of Science、SemanticScholar 和 PubMed。结果表明,各个数据库提供商之间的类型学差异很大。此外,由于出版物在各个数据库中的分类方式不同,因此研究文本和非研究文本之间的区别也会因数据源的不同而不同,而这种区别是为文献计量学分析识别相关文献所必需的。除了跨数据库比较之外,本研究的重点主要是 OpenAlex 中所包含的出版物和文献类型的覆盖范围和分析,因为 OpenAlex 作为图书馆和大学文献计量学分析中现有专有提供商的免费替代品正变得越来越重要。
Analysis of the Publication and Document Types in OpenAlex, Web of Science, Scopus, Pubmed and Semantic Scholar
This study compares and analyses publication and document types in the
following bibliographic databases: OpenAlex, Scopus, Web of Science, Semantic
Scholar and PubMed. The results demonstrate that typologies can differ
considerably between individual database providers. Moreover, the distinction
between research and non-research texts, which is required to identify relevant
documents for bibliometric analysis, can vary depending on the data source
because publications are classified differently in the respective databases.
The focus of this study, in addition to the cross-database comparison, is
primarily on the coverage and analysis of the publication and document types
contained in OpenAlex, as OpenAlex is becoming increasingly important as a free
alternative to established proprietary providers for bibliometric analyses at
libraries and universities.