女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人和同性恋加亲密关系中的治安和强制控制范围审查

IF 3.1 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Emma Jennings‐Fitz‐Gerald, Chris M. Smith, N. Zoe Hilton, Dana L. Radatz, Jimin Lee, Elke Ham, Natalie Snow
{"title":"女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人和同性恋加亲密关系中的治安和强制控制范围审查","authors":"Emma Jennings‐Fitz‐Gerald, Chris M. Smith, N. Zoe Hilton, Dana L. Radatz, Jimin Lee, Elke Ham, Natalie Snow","doi":"10.1111/soc4.13239","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Coercive control is a form of intimate partner violence (IPV) that encompasses non‐physical behaviors used to constrain and entrap a partner. Coercive control is especially relevant to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer plus (LGBTQ+) relationships when abusers target the gender and sexual identity of their partners. Victim‐survivors, community members, and service providers often struggle to identify and intervene with this form of abuse. The role of police responding to coercive control is poorly understood, despite laws and calls to criminalize coercive control. Police responses to physical abuse in LGBTQ + relationships have caused harm, and it is important to extend this knowledge to police responses to coercive control. We conducted a systematic scoping review of international academic and gray literature sources published from 2014 through 2022 on the topic of policing coercive control within LGBTQ+ intimate relationships. We identified four interrelated policing themes across 35 sources: (1) reluctance to seek help from the police, (2) low rates of reporting abuse to police, (3) police actions following reports of IPV and coercive control, and (4) police harassment and violence increasing the experience of coercive control. Our review confirms that more research is needed on LGBTQ+ survivors of coercive control and their help‐seeking, as laws and calls to criminalize coercive control may not benefit LGBTQ+ communities.","PeriodicalId":47997,"journal":{"name":"Sociology Compass","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A scoping review of policing and coercive control in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer plus intimate relationships\",\"authors\":\"Emma Jennings‐Fitz‐Gerald, Chris M. Smith, N. Zoe Hilton, Dana L. Radatz, Jimin Lee, Elke Ham, Natalie Snow\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/soc4.13239\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Coercive control is a form of intimate partner violence (IPV) that encompasses non‐physical behaviors used to constrain and entrap a partner. Coercive control is especially relevant to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer plus (LGBTQ+) relationships when abusers target the gender and sexual identity of their partners. Victim‐survivors, community members, and service providers often struggle to identify and intervene with this form of abuse. The role of police responding to coercive control is poorly understood, despite laws and calls to criminalize coercive control. Police responses to physical abuse in LGBTQ + relationships have caused harm, and it is important to extend this knowledge to police responses to coercive control. We conducted a systematic scoping review of international academic and gray literature sources published from 2014 through 2022 on the topic of policing coercive control within LGBTQ+ intimate relationships. We identified four interrelated policing themes across 35 sources: (1) reluctance to seek help from the police, (2) low rates of reporting abuse to police, (3) police actions following reports of IPV and coercive control, and (4) police harassment and violence increasing the experience of coercive control. Our review confirms that more research is needed on LGBTQ+ survivors of coercive control and their help‐seeking, as laws and calls to criminalize coercive control may not benefit LGBTQ+ communities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sociology Compass\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sociology Compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13239\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociology Compass","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.13239","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

胁迫性控制是亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的一种形式,包括用于限制和诱骗伴侣的非身体行为。当施暴者以伴侣的性别和性身份为目标时,胁迫性控制与女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别者和同性恋+(LGBTQ+)关系尤为相关。受害者-幸存者、社区成员和服务提供者往往难以识别和干预这种形式的虐待。尽管有法律规定并呼吁将胁迫性控制定为刑事犯罪,但人们对警方在应对胁迫性控制时所扮演的角色却知之甚少。警方在处理 LGBTQ + 关系中的身体虐待时造成了伤害,因此有必要将这一知识扩展到警方对胁迫性控制的应对措施中。我们对 2014 年至 2022 年间发表的有关 LGBTQ+ 亲密关系中胁迫性控制警务主题的国际学术和灰色文献资料进行了系统性的范围界定审查。我们在 35 篇文献中发现了四个相互关联的治安主题:(1)不愿向警方寻求帮助;(2)向警方报告虐待行为的比例较低;(3)警方在接到 IPV 和胁迫性控制报告后采取的行动;(4)警方的骚扰和暴力行为增加了胁迫性控制的体验。我们的研究证实,需要对遭受胁迫性控制的 LGBTQ+ 幸存者及其寻求帮助的情况进行更多研究,因为将胁迫性控制定为刑事犯罪的法律和呼吁可能无益于 LGBTQ+ 社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A scoping review of policing and coercive control in lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer plus intimate relationships
Coercive control is a form of intimate partner violence (IPV) that encompasses non‐physical behaviors used to constrain and entrap a partner. Coercive control is especially relevant to lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer plus (LGBTQ+) relationships when abusers target the gender and sexual identity of their partners. Victim‐survivors, community members, and service providers often struggle to identify and intervene with this form of abuse. The role of police responding to coercive control is poorly understood, despite laws and calls to criminalize coercive control. Police responses to physical abuse in LGBTQ + relationships have caused harm, and it is important to extend this knowledge to police responses to coercive control. We conducted a systematic scoping review of international academic and gray literature sources published from 2014 through 2022 on the topic of policing coercive control within LGBTQ+ intimate relationships. We identified four interrelated policing themes across 35 sources: (1) reluctance to seek help from the police, (2) low rates of reporting abuse to police, (3) police actions following reports of IPV and coercive control, and (4) police harassment and violence increasing the experience of coercive control. Our review confirms that more research is needed on LGBTQ+ survivors of coercive control and their help‐seeking, as laws and calls to criminalize coercive control may not benefit LGBTQ+ communities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sociology Compass
Sociology Compass SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
102
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信