电子自旋的经典模型 -- 电流模型与磁荷模型的比较

Bela Schulte Westhoff
{"title":"电子自旋的经典模型 -- 电流模型与磁荷模型的比较","authors":"Bela Schulte Westhoff","doi":"arxiv-2406.05919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ferromagnetic matter finds its microscopic origin in the intrinsic electron\nspin, which is considered to be a purely quantum mechanical property of the\nelectron. To incorporate the influence of the electron spin in the microscopic\nand macroscopic Maxwell equations -- and thereby in classical physics -- two\nmodels have been utilized: the electric current and the magnetic charge model.\nThis paper aims to highlight fundamental problems of the commonly used current\nloop model, widely employed in textbooks. This work demonstrates that the\nbehavior of a constant electric current dipole is not described by the laws of\nclassical electrodynamics. More precisely, the electric current model is\ndependent on external forces, not included in Maxwells field and force\nequations, in order to maintain the force balance on the electric charge\ndensity inside the electron. These external forces change dynamically and do\nwork on the system as the electron interacts with external fields.\nConsequently, the energies derived from classical physics (gravitational\npotential energy, kinetic energy, electrodynamic field energy) are not\nconserved in a system including constant electric current dipoles. In contrast\nto the electric current model, the magnetic charge model employs separate\nmagnetic charges to model the electron spin, requiring the Maxwell equations to\nbe extended by magnetic sources. This paper intends to illustrate that the\nmagnetic charge model has significant advantages over the electric current\nmodel as it needs no external forces and energies, is a closed\nelectromechanical system and is fully modeled by the classical laws of physics.\nThis work forms the basis for the derivation and consideration of equivalent\nproblems in macroscopic systems involving ferromagnetic matter.","PeriodicalId":501482,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Classical Physics","volume":"111 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Classical Models of the Electron Spin -- Comparison of the Electric Current Model and the Magnetic Charge Model\",\"authors\":\"Bela Schulte Westhoff\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2406.05919\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Ferromagnetic matter finds its microscopic origin in the intrinsic electron\\nspin, which is considered to be a purely quantum mechanical property of the\\nelectron. To incorporate the influence of the electron spin in the microscopic\\nand macroscopic Maxwell equations -- and thereby in classical physics -- two\\nmodels have been utilized: the electric current and the magnetic charge model.\\nThis paper aims to highlight fundamental problems of the commonly used current\\nloop model, widely employed in textbooks. This work demonstrates that the\\nbehavior of a constant electric current dipole is not described by the laws of\\nclassical electrodynamics. More precisely, the electric current model is\\ndependent on external forces, not included in Maxwells field and force\\nequations, in order to maintain the force balance on the electric charge\\ndensity inside the electron. These external forces change dynamically and do\\nwork on the system as the electron interacts with external fields.\\nConsequently, the energies derived from classical physics (gravitational\\npotential energy, kinetic energy, electrodynamic field energy) are not\\nconserved in a system including constant electric current dipoles. In contrast\\nto the electric current model, the magnetic charge model employs separate\\nmagnetic charges to model the electron spin, requiring the Maxwell equations to\\nbe extended by magnetic sources. This paper intends to illustrate that the\\nmagnetic charge model has significant advantages over the electric current\\nmodel as it needs no external forces and energies, is a closed\\nelectromechanical system and is fully modeled by the classical laws of physics.\\nThis work forms the basis for the derivation and consideration of equivalent\\nproblems in macroscopic systems involving ferromagnetic matter.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Classical Physics\",\"volume\":\"111 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Classical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2406.05919\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Classical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2406.05919","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

铁磁性物质的微观起源是固有的电子自旋,它被认为是电子的纯量子力学特性。为了将电子自旋的影响纳入微观和宏观麦克斯韦方程,从而纳入经典物理学,人们使用了两种模型:电流模型和磁荷模型。这项工作证明,恒定电流偶极子的行为并不是用经典电动力学定律来描述的。更确切地说,电流模型依赖于麦克斯韦场和力方程中未包含的外力,以维持电子内部电荷密度的力平衡。因此,在一个包含恒定电流偶极子的系统中,经典物理学推导出的能量(引力势能、动能、电动场能)是不守恒的。与电流模型相反,磁荷模型采用分离的磁荷来模拟电子自旋,这就要求麦克斯韦方程通过磁源进行扩展。本文旨在说明磁荷模型与电流模型相比具有显著的优势,因为它不需要外力和能量,是一个封闭的机电系统,并且完全由经典物理定律建模。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Classical Models of the Electron Spin -- Comparison of the Electric Current Model and the Magnetic Charge Model
Ferromagnetic matter finds its microscopic origin in the intrinsic electron spin, which is considered to be a purely quantum mechanical property of the electron. To incorporate the influence of the electron spin in the microscopic and macroscopic Maxwell equations -- and thereby in classical physics -- two models have been utilized: the electric current and the magnetic charge model. This paper aims to highlight fundamental problems of the commonly used current loop model, widely employed in textbooks. This work demonstrates that the behavior of a constant electric current dipole is not described by the laws of classical electrodynamics. More precisely, the electric current model is dependent on external forces, not included in Maxwells field and force equations, in order to maintain the force balance on the electric charge density inside the electron. These external forces change dynamically and do work on the system as the electron interacts with external fields. Consequently, the energies derived from classical physics (gravitational potential energy, kinetic energy, electrodynamic field energy) are not conserved in a system including constant electric current dipoles. In contrast to the electric current model, the magnetic charge model employs separate magnetic charges to model the electron spin, requiring the Maxwell equations to be extended by magnetic sources. This paper intends to illustrate that the magnetic charge model has significant advantages over the electric current model as it needs no external forces and energies, is a closed electromechanical system and is fully modeled by the classical laws of physics. This work forms the basis for the derivation and consideration of equivalent problems in macroscopic systems involving ferromagnetic matter.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信