预测上消化道出血临床结果的预后评分

IF 0.8 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Gaurav Khatana, Sunil Kumar K, Sandesh Kolassery, Saji Sebastian, Deni Joseph, Ramu Muraleedharanpillai, Tony Joseph, Nithya V, Lal Krishna Unnikrishnan, Gino Rony
{"title":"预测上消化道出血临床结果的预后评分","authors":"Gaurav Khatana, Sunil Kumar K, Sandesh Kolassery, Saji Sebastian, Deni Joseph, Ramu Muraleedharanpillai, Tony Joseph, Nithya V, Lal Krishna Unnikrishnan, Gino Rony","doi":"10.1186/s43066-024-00357-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to determine the performance of AIMS65, Rockall score, and Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) in patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) and to compare results between patients with nonvariceal UGIB (NVUGIB) and variceal UGIB (VUGIB). We conducted a single-center prospective cohort study between December 2021 and December 2022. A total of 400 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study, out of which 232 patients (58%) had NVUGIB and 168 patients (42%) had VUGIB. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed for all outcomes for comparison. Of the total of 400 patients with UGIB, 232 patients (58%) had NVUGIB, and 168 patients (42%) had VUGIB. The present study showed that GBS (AUROC 0.729, 95% CI: 0.598–0.859, p = 0.001) and RS (AUROC 0.693, 95% CI: 0.579–0.807, p = 0.005) but not AIMS65 (AUROC, 0.545, 95% CI: 0.412–0.679, p = 0.500) predicted in-hospital and overall 6-week mortality in patients with UGIB. All the three scores predicted need for blood transfusion and poor composite outcomes (p < 0.05). The need for endoscopic intervention was predicted by all the three scores in overall UGIB (OUGIB) patients (p < 0.05), only GBS and RS in NVUGIB patients (p < 0.05). Rebleeding was best predicated by RS in both OUGIB and NVUGIB patients (p < 0.05). None of the scores predicted the need for endoscopic intervention, rebleeding, need for surgical and radiological intervention, and composite outcomes in VUGIB patients (p > 0.05). GBS and RS were superior to AIMS65 in predicted in-hospital and overall 6-week mortality in all the three categories: OUGIB, NVUGIB, and VUGIB patients.\n","PeriodicalId":11620,"journal":{"name":"Egyptian Liver Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic scores for predicting clinical outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding\",\"authors\":\"Gaurav Khatana, Sunil Kumar K, Sandesh Kolassery, Saji Sebastian, Deni Joseph, Ramu Muraleedharanpillai, Tony Joseph, Nithya V, Lal Krishna Unnikrishnan, Gino Rony\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s43066-024-00357-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aimed to determine the performance of AIMS65, Rockall score, and Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) in patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) and to compare results between patients with nonvariceal UGIB (NVUGIB) and variceal UGIB (VUGIB). We conducted a single-center prospective cohort study between December 2021 and December 2022. A total of 400 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study, out of which 232 patients (58%) had NVUGIB and 168 patients (42%) had VUGIB. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed for all outcomes for comparison. Of the total of 400 patients with UGIB, 232 patients (58%) had NVUGIB, and 168 patients (42%) had VUGIB. The present study showed that GBS (AUROC 0.729, 95% CI: 0.598–0.859, p = 0.001) and RS (AUROC 0.693, 95% CI: 0.579–0.807, p = 0.005) but not AIMS65 (AUROC, 0.545, 95% CI: 0.412–0.679, p = 0.500) predicted in-hospital and overall 6-week mortality in patients with UGIB. All the three scores predicted need for blood transfusion and poor composite outcomes (p < 0.05). The need for endoscopic intervention was predicted by all the three scores in overall UGIB (OUGIB) patients (p < 0.05), only GBS and RS in NVUGIB patients (p < 0.05). Rebleeding was best predicated by RS in both OUGIB and NVUGIB patients (p < 0.05). None of the scores predicted the need for endoscopic intervention, rebleeding, need for surgical and radiological intervention, and composite outcomes in VUGIB patients (p > 0.05). GBS and RS were superior to AIMS65 in predicted in-hospital and overall 6-week mortality in all the three categories: OUGIB, NVUGIB, and VUGIB patients.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":11620,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Egyptian Liver Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Egyptian Liver Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43066-024-00357-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Egyptian Liver Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43066-024-00357-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在确定 AIMS65、Rockall 评分和格拉斯哥-布拉奇福德评分(GBS)在上消化道出血(UGIB)患者中的表现,并比较非静脉曲张性 UGIB(NVUGIB)和静脉曲张性 UGIB(VUGIB)患者的结果。我们在 2021 年 12 月至 2022 年 12 月期间开展了一项单中心前瞻性队列研究。研究共纳入了 400 名符合纳入标准的患者,其中 232 名患者(58%)患有 NVUGIB,168 名患者(42%)患有 VUGIB。对所有结果进行了接收者操作特征曲线分析,以进行比较。在总共 400 名 UGIB 患者中,232 名患者(58%)为 NVUGIB,168 名患者(42%)为 VUGIB。本研究显示,GBS(AUROC 0.729,95% CI:0.598-0.859,p = 0.001)和 RS(AUROC 0.693,95% CI:0.579-0.807,p = 0.005)而非 AIMS65(AUROC,0.545,95% CI:0.412-0.679,p = 0.500)可预测 UGIB 患者的院内死亡率和 6 周总死亡率。所有三个评分都能预测输血需求和不良的综合结果(P 0.05)。在预测所有三个类别患者的院内死亡率和 6 周总死亡率方面,GBS 和 RS 均优于 AIMS65:OUGIB、NVUGIB 和 VUGIB 患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Prognostic scores for predicting clinical outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding
This study aimed to determine the performance of AIMS65, Rockall score, and Glasgow-Blatchford score (GBS) in patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) and to compare results between patients with nonvariceal UGIB (NVUGIB) and variceal UGIB (VUGIB). We conducted a single-center prospective cohort study between December 2021 and December 2022. A total of 400 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in the study, out of which 232 patients (58%) had NVUGIB and 168 patients (42%) had VUGIB. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed for all outcomes for comparison. Of the total of 400 patients with UGIB, 232 patients (58%) had NVUGIB, and 168 patients (42%) had VUGIB. The present study showed that GBS (AUROC 0.729, 95% CI: 0.598–0.859, p = 0.001) and RS (AUROC 0.693, 95% CI: 0.579–0.807, p = 0.005) but not AIMS65 (AUROC, 0.545, 95% CI: 0.412–0.679, p = 0.500) predicted in-hospital and overall 6-week mortality in patients with UGIB. All the three scores predicted need for blood transfusion and poor composite outcomes (p < 0.05). The need for endoscopic intervention was predicted by all the three scores in overall UGIB (OUGIB) patients (p < 0.05), only GBS and RS in NVUGIB patients (p < 0.05). Rebleeding was best predicated by RS in both OUGIB and NVUGIB patients (p < 0.05). None of the scores predicted the need for endoscopic intervention, rebleeding, need for surgical and radiological intervention, and composite outcomes in VUGIB patients (p > 0.05). GBS and RS were superior to AIMS65 in predicted in-hospital and overall 6-week mortality in all the three categories: OUGIB, NVUGIB, and VUGIB patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Egyptian Liver Journal
Egyptian Liver Journal Medicine-Hepatology
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
60
审稿时长
9 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信