中纬度地区不同经度的 NmF2 变异:地磁活动的作用

IF 0.7 4区 地球科学 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
V. Kh. Depuev, M. G. Deminov, G. F. Deminova, A. Kh. Depueva
{"title":"中纬度地区不同经度的 NmF2 变异:地磁活动的作用","authors":"V. Kh. Depuev,&nbsp;M. G. Deminov,&nbsp;G. F. Deminova,&nbsp;A. Kh. Depueva","doi":"10.1134/S0016793224600073","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Based on data from mid-latitude ionospheric stations at close corrected geomagnetic latitudes, the properties of the variability in the <i>F</i>2 layer peak density (<i>NmF</i>2) at different longitudes were analyzed during increased (48 &gt; <i>ap</i>(τ) &gt; 27) and high (<i>ap</i>(τ) &gt; 48) geomagnetic activity, where <i>ap</i>(τ) is the weighted average <i>ap</i>-index of this activity. The standard deviation σ of <i>Nm</i> fluctuations with respect to the quiet level and the average shift of these fluctuations <i>x</i><sub>ave</sub> were used as characteristics of this variability. It was found that at all analyzed stations, the variance σ <sup>2</sup> for increased geomagnetic activity is greater than for quiet conditions but hardly differs from σ <sup>2</sup> for high geomagnetic activity. For all analyzed cases, the average shift <i>x</i><sub>ave</sub> &lt; 0, and for high geomagnetic activity, the absolute value of <i>x</i><sub>ave</sub> is greater than for increased geomagnetic activity. The difference in <i>x</i><sub>ave</sub> values between the analyzed stations is quite large. One reason for this difference may be related to the dependence of <i>x</i><sub>ave</sub> on geomagnetic latitudes. Approximations of the geomagnetic field by the tilted dipole (TD), eccentric dipole (ED), or using corrected geomagnetic (CGM) coordinates were used to select these latitudes. It was found that the dependence of <i>x</i><sub>ave</sub> on ED latitude is more accurate than the dependence of <i>x</i><sub>ave</sub> on TD latitude and, moreover, the dependence of <i>x</i><sub>ave</sub> on CGM latitude. Therefore, ED latitudes, and not CGM latitudes, are optimal for accounting for storm effects on the <i>F</i>2 layer peak density at mid-latitudes. This conclusion has apparently been obtained for the first time.</p>","PeriodicalId":55597,"journal":{"name":"Geomagnetism and Aeronomy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"NmF2 Variability at Different Longitudes in Mid-Latitudes: The Role of Geomagnetic Activity\",\"authors\":\"V. Kh. Depuev,&nbsp;M. G. Deminov,&nbsp;G. F. Deminova,&nbsp;A. Kh. Depueva\",\"doi\":\"10.1134/S0016793224600073\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Based on data from mid-latitude ionospheric stations at close corrected geomagnetic latitudes, the properties of the variability in the <i>F</i>2 layer peak density (<i>NmF</i>2) at different longitudes were analyzed during increased (48 &gt; <i>ap</i>(τ) &gt; 27) and high (<i>ap</i>(τ) &gt; 48) geomagnetic activity, where <i>ap</i>(τ) is the weighted average <i>ap</i>-index of this activity. The standard deviation σ of <i>Nm</i> fluctuations with respect to the quiet level and the average shift of these fluctuations <i>x</i><sub>ave</sub> were used as characteristics of this variability. It was found that at all analyzed stations, the variance σ <sup>2</sup> for increased geomagnetic activity is greater than for quiet conditions but hardly differs from σ <sup>2</sup> for high geomagnetic activity. For all analyzed cases, the average shift <i>x</i><sub>ave</sub> &lt; 0, and for high geomagnetic activity, the absolute value of <i>x</i><sub>ave</sub> is greater than for increased geomagnetic activity. The difference in <i>x</i><sub>ave</sub> values between the analyzed stations is quite large. One reason for this difference may be related to the dependence of <i>x</i><sub>ave</sub> on geomagnetic latitudes. Approximations of the geomagnetic field by the tilted dipole (TD), eccentric dipole (ED), or using corrected geomagnetic (CGM) coordinates were used to select these latitudes. It was found that the dependence of <i>x</i><sub>ave</sub> on ED latitude is more accurate than the dependence of <i>x</i><sub>ave</sub> on TD latitude and, moreover, the dependence of <i>x</i><sub>ave</sub> on CGM latitude. Therefore, ED latitudes, and not CGM latitudes, are optimal for accounting for storm effects on the <i>F</i>2 layer peak density at mid-latitudes. This conclusion has apparently been obtained for the first time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geomagnetism and Aeronomy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geomagnetism and Aeronomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0016793224600073\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomagnetism and Aeronomy","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1134/S0016793224600073","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要根据来自接近校正地磁纬度的中纬度电离层台站的数据,分析了在地磁活动增强(48 > ap(τ) > 27)和增强(ap(τ) > 48)期间不同经度的 F2 层峰值密度(NmF2)的变化特性,其中 ap(τ) 是这种活动的加权平均 ap 指数。Nm 波动相对于安静水平的标准偏差 σ 和这些波动的平均偏移 xave 被用作这种变化的特征。结果发现,在所有分析的台站中,地磁活动增加时的σ 2 方差大于安静时的σ 2 方差,但与地磁活动频繁时的σ 2 方差几乎没有差别。在所有分析的情况下,平均偏移 xave 均为 0,在地磁活动频繁时,xave 的绝对值大于地磁活动增加时的值。分析站之间的 xave 值差异很大。造成这种差异的原因之一可能与 xave 与地磁纬度的关系有关。在选择这些纬度时,使用了倾斜偶极子(TD)、偏心偶极子(ED)或使用校正地磁(CGM)坐标对地磁场的近似值。研究发现,xave 与 ED 纬度的关系比 xave 与 TD 纬度的关系更准确,而且 xave 与 CGM 纬度的关系也更准确。因此,在考虑风暴对中纬度 F2 层峰值密度的影响时,ED 纬度而不是 CGM 纬度是最佳选择。这一结论显然是首次得出的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

NmF2 Variability at Different Longitudes in Mid-Latitudes: The Role of Geomagnetic Activity

NmF2 Variability at Different Longitudes in Mid-Latitudes: The Role of Geomagnetic Activity

NmF2 Variability at Different Longitudes in Mid-Latitudes: The Role of Geomagnetic Activity

Based on data from mid-latitude ionospheric stations at close corrected geomagnetic latitudes, the properties of the variability in the F2 layer peak density (NmF2) at different longitudes were analyzed during increased (48 > ap(τ) > 27) and high (ap(τ) > 48) geomagnetic activity, where ap(τ) is the weighted average ap-index of this activity. The standard deviation σ of Nm fluctuations with respect to the quiet level and the average shift of these fluctuations xave were used as characteristics of this variability. It was found that at all analyzed stations, the variance σ 2 for increased geomagnetic activity is greater than for quiet conditions but hardly differs from σ 2 for high geomagnetic activity. For all analyzed cases, the average shift xave < 0, and for high geomagnetic activity, the absolute value of xave is greater than for increased geomagnetic activity. The difference in xave values between the analyzed stations is quite large. One reason for this difference may be related to the dependence of xave on geomagnetic latitudes. Approximations of the geomagnetic field by the tilted dipole (TD), eccentric dipole (ED), or using corrected geomagnetic (CGM) coordinates were used to select these latitudes. It was found that the dependence of xave on ED latitude is more accurate than the dependence of xave on TD latitude and, moreover, the dependence of xave on CGM latitude. Therefore, ED latitudes, and not CGM latitudes, are optimal for accounting for storm effects on the F2 layer peak density at mid-latitudes. This conclusion has apparently been obtained for the first time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy
Geomagnetism and Aeronomy Earth and Planetary Sciences-Space and Planetary Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
33.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Geomagnetism and Aeronomy is a bimonthly periodical that covers the fields of interplanetary space; geoeffective solar events; the magnetosphere; the ionosphere; the upper and middle atmosphere; the action of solar variability and activity on atmospheric parameters and climate; the main magnetic field and its secular variations, excursion, and inversion; and other related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信