游戏中的学习:系统回顾

IF 7.3 2区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Rong-Jun Qin, Yang Yu
{"title":"游戏中的学习:系统回顾","authors":"Rong-Jun Qin, Yang Yu","doi":"10.1007/s11432-023-3955-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Game theory studies the mathematical models for self-interested individuals. Nash equilibrium is arguably the most central solution in game theory. While finding the Nash equilibrium in general is known as polynomial parity arguments on directed graphs (PPAD)-complete, learning in games provides an alternative to approximate Nash equilibrium, which iteratively updates the player’s strategy through interactions with other players. Rules and models have been developed for learning in games, such as fictitious play and no-regret learning. Particularly, with recent advances in online learning and deep reinforcement learning, techniques from these fields greatly boost the breakthroughs in learning in games from theory to application. As a result, we have witnessed many superhuman game AI systems. The techniques used in these systems evolve from conventional search and learning to purely reinforcement learning (RL)-style learning methods, gradually getting rid of the domain knowledge. In this article, we systematically review the above techniques, discuss the trend of basic learning rules towards a unified framework, and recap applications in large games. Finally, we discuss some future directions and make the prospect of future game AI systems. We hope this article will give some insights into designing novel approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":21618,"journal":{"name":"Science China Information Sciences","volume":"176 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning in games: a systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Rong-Jun Qin, Yang Yu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11432-023-3955-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Game theory studies the mathematical models for self-interested individuals. Nash equilibrium is arguably the most central solution in game theory. While finding the Nash equilibrium in general is known as polynomial parity arguments on directed graphs (PPAD)-complete, learning in games provides an alternative to approximate Nash equilibrium, which iteratively updates the player’s strategy through interactions with other players. Rules and models have been developed for learning in games, such as fictitious play and no-regret learning. Particularly, with recent advances in online learning and deep reinforcement learning, techniques from these fields greatly boost the breakthroughs in learning in games from theory to application. As a result, we have witnessed many superhuman game AI systems. The techniques used in these systems evolve from conventional search and learning to purely reinforcement learning (RL)-style learning methods, gradually getting rid of the domain knowledge. In this article, we systematically review the above techniques, discuss the trend of basic learning rules towards a unified framework, and recap applications in large games. Finally, we discuss some future directions and make the prospect of future game AI systems. We hope this article will give some insights into designing novel approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science China Information Sciences\",\"volume\":\"176 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science China Information Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-023-3955-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science China Information Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-023-3955-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

博弈论研究自利个体的数学模型。纳什均衡可以说是博弈论中最核心的解决方案。一般来说,寻找纳什均衡被称为有向图上的多项式奇偶论证(PPAD)--不完全,而博弈中的学习则为近似纳什均衡提供了另一种选择,即通过与其他博弈者的互动迭代更新博弈者的策略。人们已经开发出了游戏学习的规则和模型,如虚构游戏和无悔学习。特别是随着在线学习和深度强化学习的最新进展,这些领域的技术极大地推动了博弈学习从理论到应用的突破。因此,我们看到了许多超人的游戏人工智能系统。这些系统所使用的技术从传统的搜索和学习发展到纯粹的强化学习(RL)式学习方法,逐渐摆脱了领域知识的束缚。在本文中,我们系统地回顾了上述技术,讨论了基本学习规则向统一框架发展的趋势,并回顾了在大型游戏中的应用。最后,我们讨论了一些未来的方向,并对未来的游戏人工智能系统进行了展望。希望本文能为设计新颖的方法提供一些启发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning in games: a systematic review

Game theory studies the mathematical models for self-interested individuals. Nash equilibrium is arguably the most central solution in game theory. While finding the Nash equilibrium in general is known as polynomial parity arguments on directed graphs (PPAD)-complete, learning in games provides an alternative to approximate Nash equilibrium, which iteratively updates the player’s strategy through interactions with other players. Rules and models have been developed for learning in games, such as fictitious play and no-regret learning. Particularly, with recent advances in online learning and deep reinforcement learning, techniques from these fields greatly boost the breakthroughs in learning in games from theory to application. As a result, we have witnessed many superhuman game AI systems. The techniques used in these systems evolve from conventional search and learning to purely reinforcement learning (RL)-style learning methods, gradually getting rid of the domain knowledge. In this article, we systematically review the above techniques, discuss the trend of basic learning rules towards a unified framework, and recap applications in large games. Finally, we discuss some future directions and make the prospect of future game AI systems. We hope this article will give some insights into designing novel approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Science China Information Sciences
Science China Information Sciences COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
5.70%
发文量
224
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Science China Information Sciences is a dedicated journal that showcases high-quality, original research across various domains of information sciences. It encompasses Computer Science & Technologies, Control Science & Engineering, Information & Communication Engineering, Microelectronics & Solid-State Electronics, and Quantum Information, providing a platform for the dissemination of significant contributions in these fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信