2 型糖尿病疗效的年龄和性别差异:总体和个体数据的网络荟萃分析

Peter Hanlon, Elaine Butterly, Lili Wei, Heather Wightman, Saleh Ali M Almazam, Khalid Alsallumi, Jamie Crowther, Ryan McChrystal, Heidi Rennison, Katherine Hughes, Jim Lewsey, Robert Lindsay, Stuart McGurnaghan, John Petrie, Laurie A Tomlinson, Sarah Wild, Amanda Adler, Naveed Sattar, David Phillippo, Sofia Dias, Nicky Welton, David A McAllister
{"title":"2 型糖尿病疗效的年龄和性别差异:总体和个体数据的网络荟萃分析","authors":"Peter Hanlon, Elaine Butterly, Lili Wei, Heather Wightman, Saleh Ali M Almazam, Khalid Alsallumi, Jamie Crowther, Ryan McChrystal, Heidi Rennison, Katherine Hughes, Jim Lewsey, Robert Lindsay, Stuart McGurnaghan, John Petrie, Laurie A Tomlinson, Sarah Wild, Amanda Adler, Naveed Sattar, David Phillippo, Sofia Dias, Nicky Welton, David A McAllister","doi":"10.1101/2024.06.23.24309242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance\nSodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor analogues (GLP1ra) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) improve hyperglycaemia and, in the case of SGLT2i and GLP1ra, reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in type 2 diabetes. It is not clear whether efficacy varies by age or sex. Objective\nAssess whether age or sex are associated with differences in efficacy of SGL2i, GLP1ra and DPP4i.\nData sources\nMedline, Embase and clinical trial registries.\nStudy selection\nTwo independent reviewers screened for randomised controlled trials of SGLT2i/GLP1ra/DPP4i, compared to placebo/active comparator, in adults with type 2 diabetes. Data extraction and synthesis\nWe sought individual participant data (IPD) all eligible studies. Where IPD were available, we modelled age- and sex-treatment interactions for each trial. Otherwise, we assessed age-sex distributions along with results from aggregate trial data. IPD and aggregate findings were combined in a Bayesian network meta-analysis.\nMain outcome measures\nHbA1c and MACE. Results\nWe identified 616 eligible trials (604 reporting HbA1c, 23 reporting MACE) and obtained IPD for 75 trials (6 reporting MACE). Mean age was 59.0 (10.7) years and 64.0 (8.6) in HbA1c and MACE trials, respectively. Proportions of female were 43.1% and 44.0% in HbA1c and MACE trials, respectively. SGLT2i reduced HbA1c by 0.5-1.0% overall compared to placebo. This reduction versus placebo was attenuated in older participants (change in HbA1c 0.25 percentage-points less for 75-year-olds compared to 45-year-olds). SGLT2i showed greater relative efficacy in MACE risk reduction among older than younger people. This finding was sensitive to the exclusion of one of the IPD MACE trials, however, in all sensitivity analyses, SGLT2i were either as efficacious or more efficacious in older participants. There was no consistently significant difference in efficacy by age for GLP1ra or DPP4i for HbA1c or MACE, nor were there consistent significant sex differences for any class.\nConclusion\nNewer glucose-lowering drugs are efficacious across age and sex groups. SGLT2i are more cardioprotective in older than younger people despite smaller HbA1c reductions. Age alone should not be a barrier to treatments with proven cardiovascular benefit providing they are well tolerated align with patient priorities.","PeriodicalId":501419,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Endocrinology","volume":"125 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Age- and sex- differences in efficacy of treatments for type 2 diabetes: Network meta-analysis of aggregate and individual level data\",\"authors\":\"Peter Hanlon, Elaine Butterly, Lili Wei, Heather Wightman, Saleh Ali M Almazam, Khalid Alsallumi, Jamie Crowther, Ryan McChrystal, Heidi Rennison, Katherine Hughes, Jim Lewsey, Robert Lindsay, Stuart McGurnaghan, John Petrie, Laurie A Tomlinson, Sarah Wild, Amanda Adler, Naveed Sattar, David Phillippo, Sofia Dias, Nicky Welton, David A McAllister\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.06.23.24309242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Importance\\nSodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor analogues (GLP1ra) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) improve hyperglycaemia and, in the case of SGLT2i and GLP1ra, reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in type 2 diabetes. It is not clear whether efficacy varies by age or sex. Objective\\nAssess whether age or sex are associated with differences in efficacy of SGL2i, GLP1ra and DPP4i.\\nData sources\\nMedline, Embase and clinical trial registries.\\nStudy selection\\nTwo independent reviewers screened for randomised controlled trials of SGLT2i/GLP1ra/DPP4i, compared to placebo/active comparator, in adults with type 2 diabetes. Data extraction and synthesis\\nWe sought individual participant data (IPD) all eligible studies. Where IPD were available, we modelled age- and sex-treatment interactions for each trial. Otherwise, we assessed age-sex distributions along with results from aggregate trial data. IPD and aggregate findings were combined in a Bayesian network meta-analysis.\\nMain outcome measures\\nHbA1c and MACE. Results\\nWe identified 616 eligible trials (604 reporting HbA1c, 23 reporting MACE) and obtained IPD for 75 trials (6 reporting MACE). Mean age was 59.0 (10.7) years and 64.0 (8.6) in HbA1c and MACE trials, respectively. Proportions of female were 43.1% and 44.0% in HbA1c and MACE trials, respectively. SGLT2i reduced HbA1c by 0.5-1.0% overall compared to placebo. This reduction versus placebo was attenuated in older participants (change in HbA1c 0.25 percentage-points less for 75-year-olds compared to 45-year-olds). SGLT2i showed greater relative efficacy in MACE risk reduction among older than younger people. This finding was sensitive to the exclusion of one of the IPD MACE trials, however, in all sensitivity analyses, SGLT2i were either as efficacious or more efficacious in older participants. There was no consistently significant difference in efficacy by age for GLP1ra or DPP4i for HbA1c or MACE, nor were there consistent significant sex differences for any class.\\nConclusion\\nNewer glucose-lowering drugs are efficacious across age and sex groups. SGLT2i are more cardioprotective in older than younger people despite smaller HbA1c reductions. Age alone should not be a barrier to treatments with proven cardiovascular benefit providing they are well tolerated align with patient priorities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Endocrinology\",\"volume\":\"125 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Endocrinology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.23.24309242\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.06.23.24309242","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性葡萄糖钠共转运体 2 抑制剂 (SGLT2i)、胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体类似物 (GLP1ra) 和二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂 (DPP4i) 可改善 2 型糖尿病患者的高血糖状况,对于 SGLT2i 和 GLP1ra,可降低 2 型糖尿病患者发生主要不良心血管事件 (MACE) 的风险。目前尚不清楚疗效是否因年龄或性别而异。数据来源Medline、Embase和临床试验登记处。研究筛选两位独立审稿人筛选了在成人2型糖尿病患者中进行的SGLT2i/GLP1ra/DPP4i与安慰剂/活性比较药的随机对照试验。数据提取与综合我们寻求所有符合条件的研究的个体参与者数据(IPD)。在有 IPD 的情况下,我们为每项试验建立了年龄和性别与治疗相互作用的模型。否则,我们将评估年龄-性别分布以及综合试验数据的结果。主要结果指标HbA1c和MACE。结果我们确定了 616 项符合条件的试验(604 项报告 HbA1c,23 项报告 MACE),并获得了 75 项试验(6 项报告 MACE)的 IPD。HbA1c 和 MACE 试验的平均年龄分别为 59.0 (10.7) 岁和 64.0 (8.6)岁。在 HbA1c 和 MACE 试验中,女性比例分别为 43.1% 和 44.0%。与安慰剂相比,SGLT2i 可使 HbA1c 总体降低 0.5-1.0%。与安慰剂相比,老年参与者的降幅有所减弱(与 45 岁的参与者相比,75 岁的参与者 HbA1c 的变化幅度要小 0.25 个百分点)。在降低 MACE 风险方面,SGLT2i 对老年人的相对疗效高于年轻人。然而,在所有敏感性分析中,SGLT2i 对老年患者的疗效相同或更佳。GLP1ra或DPP4i在不同年龄段对HbA1c或MACE的疗效没有持续的显著差异,任何一类药物也没有持续的显著性别差异。尽管 HbA1c 的降低幅度较小,但 SGLT2i 对老年人的心脏保护作用要强于年轻人。年龄本身不应成为接受经证实对心血管有益的治疗的障碍,但前提是这些药物必须具有良好的耐受性并符合患者的优先考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Age- and sex- differences in efficacy of treatments for type 2 diabetes: Network meta-analysis of aggregate and individual level data
Importance Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor analogues (GLP1ra) and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) improve hyperglycaemia and, in the case of SGLT2i and GLP1ra, reduce the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in type 2 diabetes. It is not clear whether efficacy varies by age or sex. Objective Assess whether age or sex are associated with differences in efficacy of SGL2i, GLP1ra and DPP4i. Data sources Medline, Embase and clinical trial registries. Study selection Two independent reviewers screened for randomised controlled trials of SGLT2i/GLP1ra/DPP4i, compared to placebo/active comparator, in adults with type 2 diabetes. Data extraction and synthesis We sought individual participant data (IPD) all eligible studies. Where IPD were available, we modelled age- and sex-treatment interactions for each trial. Otherwise, we assessed age-sex distributions along with results from aggregate trial data. IPD and aggregate findings were combined in a Bayesian network meta-analysis. Main outcome measures HbA1c and MACE. Results We identified 616 eligible trials (604 reporting HbA1c, 23 reporting MACE) and obtained IPD for 75 trials (6 reporting MACE). Mean age was 59.0 (10.7) years and 64.0 (8.6) in HbA1c and MACE trials, respectively. Proportions of female were 43.1% and 44.0% in HbA1c and MACE trials, respectively. SGLT2i reduced HbA1c by 0.5-1.0% overall compared to placebo. This reduction versus placebo was attenuated in older participants (change in HbA1c 0.25 percentage-points less for 75-year-olds compared to 45-year-olds). SGLT2i showed greater relative efficacy in MACE risk reduction among older than younger people. This finding was sensitive to the exclusion of one of the IPD MACE trials, however, in all sensitivity analyses, SGLT2i were either as efficacious or more efficacious in older participants. There was no consistently significant difference in efficacy by age for GLP1ra or DPP4i for HbA1c or MACE, nor were there consistent significant sex differences for any class. Conclusion Newer glucose-lowering drugs are efficacious across age and sex groups. SGLT2i are more cardioprotective in older than younger people despite smaller HbA1c reductions. Age alone should not be a barrier to treatments with proven cardiovascular benefit providing they are well tolerated align with patient priorities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信