12 年级学生对佛兰德斯教育轨道的看法

IF 3.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL
Margo Vandenbroeck, Jonas Dockx, Rianne Janssen
{"title":"12 年级学生对佛兰德斯教育轨道的看法","authors":"Margo Vandenbroeck, Jonas Dockx, Rianne Janssen","doi":"10.1007/s11218-024-09901-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The stereotype content model (SCM) describes that groups of people are mainly appraised according to two dimensions: warmth and competence. The present study’s aim was to investigate possible stereotyped perceptions held by Grade 12 students in Flanders (the northern part of Belgium) of students in the three major educational tracks. They were asked for ingroup and outgroup evaluations, both in general and for different personality traits. As expected, evidence was found for ingroup favouritism, meaning that respondents rated students from their own educational track more positively compared to students in other educational tracks. The status hierarchy between educational tracks in Flanders was reflected in the judgements of respondents from the general track and respondents from the technical track. Respondents from the vocational track showed a reverse pattern, which can be explained by social identity theory and an anti-school culture in vocational education. Finally, for positively formulated personality traits, the warmth-competence dimensionality of the judgements was confirmed together with the compensation hypothesis of the SCM, stating that lower ratings on warmth covary with higher ratings on competence (and vice versa).</p>","PeriodicalId":51467,"journal":{"name":"Social Psychology of Education","volume":"207 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grade 12 students’ perceptions of educational tracks in Flanders\",\"authors\":\"Margo Vandenbroeck, Jonas Dockx, Rianne Janssen\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11218-024-09901-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The stereotype content model (SCM) describes that groups of people are mainly appraised according to two dimensions: warmth and competence. The present study’s aim was to investigate possible stereotyped perceptions held by Grade 12 students in Flanders (the northern part of Belgium) of students in the three major educational tracks. They were asked for ingroup and outgroup evaluations, both in general and for different personality traits. As expected, evidence was found for ingroup favouritism, meaning that respondents rated students from their own educational track more positively compared to students in other educational tracks. The status hierarchy between educational tracks in Flanders was reflected in the judgements of respondents from the general track and respondents from the technical track. Respondents from the vocational track showed a reverse pattern, which can be explained by social identity theory and an anti-school culture in vocational education. Finally, for positively formulated personality traits, the warmth-competence dimensionality of the judgements was confirmed together with the compensation hypothesis of the SCM, stating that lower ratings on warmth covary with higher ratings on competence (and vice versa).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51467,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Psychology of Education\",\"volume\":\"207 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Psychology of Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09901-7\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Psychology of Education","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-024-09901-7","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

刻板印象内容模型(SCM)认为,人们主要从两个维度来评价群体:热情和能力。本研究旨在调查佛兰德斯(比利时北部)12 年级学生对三大教育方向的学生可能持有的刻板印象。他们被要求对内群和外群进行总体评价以及对不同人格特质进行评价。不出所料,调查发现了群体内偏好的证据,即与其他教育方向的学生相比,受访者对自己教育方向的学生评价更积极。佛兰德斯教育系统之间的地位等级体现在普通教育系统和技术教育系统受访者的评价中。职业教育方向的受访者则表现出相反的模式,这可以用社会认同理论和职业教育中的反学校文化来解释。最后,对于正面表述的人格特质,评判的温暖-能力维度与单片机的补偿假说一起得到了证实,即对温暖的较低评价与对能力的较高评价共存(反之亦然)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Grade 12 students’ perceptions of educational tracks in Flanders

Grade 12 students’ perceptions of educational tracks in Flanders

The stereotype content model (SCM) describes that groups of people are mainly appraised according to two dimensions: warmth and competence. The present study’s aim was to investigate possible stereotyped perceptions held by Grade 12 students in Flanders (the northern part of Belgium) of students in the three major educational tracks. They were asked for ingroup and outgroup evaluations, both in general and for different personality traits. As expected, evidence was found for ingroup favouritism, meaning that respondents rated students from their own educational track more positively compared to students in other educational tracks. The status hierarchy between educational tracks in Flanders was reflected in the judgements of respondents from the general track and respondents from the technical track. Respondents from the vocational track showed a reverse pattern, which can be explained by social identity theory and an anti-school culture in vocational education. Finally, for positively formulated personality traits, the warmth-competence dimensionality of the judgements was confirmed together with the compensation hypothesis of the SCM, stating that lower ratings on warmth covary with higher ratings on competence (and vice versa).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Social Psychology of Education
Social Psychology of Education PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.40%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The field of social psychology spans the boundary between the disciplines of psychology and sociology and has traditionally been associated with empirical research. Many studies of human behaviour in education are conducted by persons who identify with social psychology or whose work falls into the social psychological ambit. Several textbooks have been published and a variety of courses are being offered on the `social psychology of education'', but no journal has hitherto appeared to cover the field. Social Psychology of Education fills this gap, covering a wide variety of content concerns, theoretical interests and research methods, among which are: Content concerns: classroom instruction decision making in education educational innovation concerns for gender, race, ethnicity and social class knowledge creation, transmission and effects leadership in schools and school systems long-term effects of instructional processes micropolitics of schools student cultures and interactions teacher recruitment and careers teacher- student relations Theoretical interests: achievement motivation attitude theory attribution theory conflict management and the learning of pro-social behaviour cultural and social capital discourse analysis group dynamics role theory social exchange theory social transition social learning theory status attainment symbolic interaction the study of organisations Research methods: comparative research experiments formal observations historical studies literature reviews panel studies qualitative methods sample surveys For social psychologists with a special interest in educational matters, educational researchers with a social psychological approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信