{"title":"全局单计数树自动机","authors":"Luisa Herrmann, Richard Mörbitz","doi":"arxiv-2406.15090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We introduce global one-counter tree automata (GOCTA) which deviate from\nusual counter tree automata by working on only one counter which is passed\nthrough the tree in lexicographical order, rather than duplicating the counter\nat every branching position. We compare the capabilities of GOCTA to those of\ncounter tree automata and obtain that their classes of recognizable tree\nlanguages are incomparable. Moreover, we show that the emptiness problem of\nGOCTA is undecidable while, in stark contrast, their membership problem is in\nP.","PeriodicalId":501124,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Formal Languages and Automata Theory","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Global One-Counter Tree Automata\",\"authors\":\"Luisa Herrmann, Richard Mörbitz\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2406.15090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We introduce global one-counter tree automata (GOCTA) which deviate from\\nusual counter tree automata by working on only one counter which is passed\\nthrough the tree in lexicographical order, rather than duplicating the counter\\nat every branching position. We compare the capabilities of GOCTA to those of\\ncounter tree automata and obtain that their classes of recognizable tree\\nlanguages are incomparable. Moreover, we show that the emptiness problem of\\nGOCTA is undecidable while, in stark contrast, their membership problem is in\\nP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501124,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Formal Languages and Automata Theory\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Formal Languages and Automata Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2406.15090\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Formal Languages and Automata Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2406.15090","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We introduce global one-counter tree automata (GOCTA) which deviate from
usual counter tree automata by working on only one counter which is passed
through the tree in lexicographical order, rather than duplicating the counter
at every branching position. We compare the capabilities of GOCTA to those of
counter tree automata and obtain that their classes of recognizable tree
languages are incomparable. Moreover, we show that the emptiness problem of
GOCTA is undecidable while, in stark contrast, their membership problem is in
P.