农业不是笑话:农业社会企业的创业生态系统

IF 2.9 Q2 MANAGEMENT
Angelica Marie Therese C. Lorenz, Peter P. Padre, Joanna Kathleen P. Ramos, Adrian A. Mabalay, Patrick Adriel H. Aure, Angelique C. Blasa-Cheng
{"title":"农业不是笑话:农业社会企业的创业生态系统","authors":"Angelica Marie Therese C. Lorenz, Peter P. Padre, Joanna Kathleen P. Ramos, Adrian A. Mabalay, Patrick Adriel H. Aure, Angelique C. Blasa-Cheng","doi":"10.1108/srj-11-2023-0629","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This study aims to work toward understanding the entrepreneurship ecosystem of agricultural social enterprises in the Philippines by exploring the interactions between policy, culture, supports and human capital domains.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The authors considered using an exploratory single-embedded case study approach, involving methodological triangulation of document analysis, semistructured interviews and participant observation. The authors analyzed the data using a narrative approach to map the ecosystem.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Through the research, the authors discovered that while each domain functions effectively individually, disconnects exist when interacting collectively as an ecosystem. The authors come to know that there is no policy consensus on social enterprise definitions, which limits specialized policy support. Although support services like incubators are available, the authors observed that awareness and accessibility vary based on location and business maturity. The authors also noted that human capital helps translate concepts into frameworks, but research tailored to agriculture and social entrepreneurship is limited. The authors come to the conclusion that collaboration and openness across domains are needed to strengthen connections and synergies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\n<p>The study was geographically limited to Luzon Island, and the authors did not include the finance and markets domains of the ecosystem model in the analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>Based on the findings, the authors identify strategies to reinforce connections, such as increasing awareness of support services, developing tailored policies for social enterprises, conducting specialized research and promoting collaboration across domains. The authors are convinced that implementing these strategies can further develop the agricultural social entrepreneurship ecosystem.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The study provides unique empirical insights into the agricultural social entrepreneurship ecosystem in the Philippines. The authors captured the narratives and experiences of key ecosystem stakeholders along the process. The authors have confidence that what the authors found can strategically guide policymakers and support organizations, educational institutions and social entrepreneurs to accelerate ecosystem development for greater social impact.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47615,"journal":{"name":"Social Responsibility Journal","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Farming is not a joke: the entrepreneurship ecosystem of agricultural social enterprises\",\"authors\":\"Angelica Marie Therese C. Lorenz, Peter P. Padre, Joanna Kathleen P. Ramos, Adrian A. Mabalay, Patrick Adriel H. Aure, Angelique C. Blasa-Cheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/srj-11-2023-0629\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This study aims to work toward understanding the entrepreneurship ecosystem of agricultural social enterprises in the Philippines by exploring the interactions between policy, culture, supports and human capital domains.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The authors considered using an exploratory single-embedded case study approach, involving methodological triangulation of document analysis, semistructured interviews and participant observation. The authors analyzed the data using a narrative approach to map the ecosystem.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>Through the research, the authors discovered that while each domain functions effectively individually, disconnects exist when interacting collectively as an ecosystem. The authors come to know that there is no policy consensus on social enterprise definitions, which limits specialized policy support. Although support services like incubators are available, the authors observed that awareness and accessibility vary based on location and business maturity. The authors also noted that human capital helps translate concepts into frameworks, but research tailored to agriculture and social entrepreneurship is limited. The authors come to the conclusion that collaboration and openness across domains are needed to strengthen connections and synergies.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Research limitations/implications</h3>\\n<p>The study was geographically limited to Luzon Island, and the authors did not include the finance and markets domains of the ecosystem model in the analysis.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>Based on the findings, the authors identify strategies to reinforce connections, such as increasing awareness of support services, developing tailored policies for social enterprises, conducting specialized research and promoting collaboration across domains. The authors are convinced that implementing these strategies can further develop the agricultural social entrepreneurship ecosystem.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>The study provides unique empirical insights into the agricultural social entrepreneurship ecosystem in the Philippines. The authors captured the narratives and experiences of key ecosystem stakeholders along the process. The authors have confidence that what the authors found can strategically guide policymakers and support organizations, educational institutions and social entrepreneurs to accelerate ecosystem development for greater social impact.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47615,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Responsibility Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Responsibility Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-11-2023-0629\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Responsibility Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/srj-11-2023-0629","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究旨在通过探索政策、文化、支持和人力资本领域之间的相互作用,了解菲律宾农业 社会企业的创业生态系统。通过研究,作者发现虽然每个领域都能有效地单独运作,但在作为一个生态系统进行集体互动时却存在脱节。作者了解到,政策对社会企业的定义没有达成共识,这限制了专门的政策支持。虽然有孵化器等支持服务,但据作者观察,不同地区和企业的成熟度不同,对这些服务的认识和利用程度也不尽相同。作者还指出,人力资本有助于将概念转化为框架,但针对农业和社会创业的研究十分有限。作者得出的结论是,需要跨领域的合作和开放,以加强联系和协同作用。研究局限性/影响研究的地理范围仅限于吕宋岛,作者没有将生态系统模型中的金融和市场领域纳入分析范围。实际意义根据研究结果,作者确定了加强联系的战略,如提高对支持服务的认识、制定针对社会企业的政策、开展专门研究和促进跨领域合作。作者相信,实施这些战略可以进一步发展农业社会创业生态系统。原创性/价值本研究为菲律宾农业社会创业生态系统提供了独特的经验见解。作者捕捉到了生态系统主要利益相关者在整个过程中的叙述和经验。作者相信,他们的发现可以为政策制定者、支持组织、教育机构和社会企业家提供战略指导,从而加快生态系统的发展,产生更大的社会影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Farming is not a joke: the entrepreneurship ecosystem of agricultural social enterprises

Purpose

This study aims to work toward understanding the entrepreneurship ecosystem of agricultural social enterprises in the Philippines by exploring the interactions between policy, culture, supports and human capital domains.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors considered using an exploratory single-embedded case study approach, involving methodological triangulation of document analysis, semistructured interviews and participant observation. The authors analyzed the data using a narrative approach to map the ecosystem.

Findings

Through the research, the authors discovered that while each domain functions effectively individually, disconnects exist when interacting collectively as an ecosystem. The authors come to know that there is no policy consensus on social enterprise definitions, which limits specialized policy support. Although support services like incubators are available, the authors observed that awareness and accessibility vary based on location and business maturity. The authors also noted that human capital helps translate concepts into frameworks, but research tailored to agriculture and social entrepreneurship is limited. The authors come to the conclusion that collaboration and openness across domains are needed to strengthen connections and synergies.

Research limitations/implications

The study was geographically limited to Luzon Island, and the authors did not include the finance and markets domains of the ecosystem model in the analysis.

Practical implications

Based on the findings, the authors identify strategies to reinforce connections, such as increasing awareness of support services, developing tailored policies for social enterprises, conducting specialized research and promoting collaboration across domains. The authors are convinced that implementing these strategies can further develop the agricultural social entrepreneurship ecosystem.

Originality/value

The study provides unique empirical insights into the agricultural social entrepreneurship ecosystem in the Philippines. The authors captured the narratives and experiences of key ecosystem stakeholders along the process. The authors have confidence that what the authors found can strategically guide policymakers and support organizations, educational institutions and social entrepreneurs to accelerate ecosystem development for greater social impact.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The Social Responsibility Journal, the official journal of the Social Responsibility Research Network, is interdisciplinary in its scope and encourages submissions from any discipline or any part of the world which addresses any element of the journal''s aims. The journal encompasses the full range of theoretical, methodological and substantive debates in the area of social responsibility. Contributions which address the link between different disciplines and / or implications for societal, organisational or individual behavior are especially encouraged. The journal publishes theoretical and empirical papers, speculative essays and review articles. The journal also publishes special themed issues under the guidance of a guest editor. Coverage: Accountability and accounting- Issues concerning sustainability- Economy and finance- Governance- Stakeholder interactions- Ecology and environment- Corporate activity and behaviour- Ethics and morality- Governmental and trans-governmental regulation- Globalisation and disintermediation- Individuals and corporate citizenship- Transparency and disclosure- Consumption and its consequences- Corporate and other forms of organization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信