灵敏度和特异性与精确度和召回率及相关难题

IF 1.8 4区 计算机科学 Q2 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
William Cullerne Bown
{"title":"灵敏度和特异性与精确度和召回率及相关难题","authors":"William Cullerne Bown","doi":"10.1007/s00357-024-09478-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Many evaluations of binary classifiers begin by adopting a pair of indicators, most often sensitivity and specificity or precision and recall. Despite this, we lack a general, pan-disciplinary basis for choosing one pair over the other, or over one of four other sibling pairs. Related obscurity afflicts the choice between the receiver operating characteristic and the precision-recall curve. Here, I return to first principles to separate concerns and distinguish more than 50 foundational concepts. This allows me to establish six rules that allow one to identify which pair is correct. The choice depends on the context in which the classifier is to operate, the intended use of the classifications, their intended user(s), and the measurability of the underlying classes, but not skew. The rules can be applied by those who develop, operate, or regulate them to classifiers composed of technology, people, or combinations of the two.</p>","PeriodicalId":50241,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Classification","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sensitivity and Specificity versus Precision and Recall, and Related Dilemmas\",\"authors\":\"William Cullerne Bown\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00357-024-09478-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Many evaluations of binary classifiers begin by adopting a pair of indicators, most often sensitivity and specificity or precision and recall. Despite this, we lack a general, pan-disciplinary basis for choosing one pair over the other, or over one of four other sibling pairs. Related obscurity afflicts the choice between the receiver operating characteristic and the precision-recall curve. Here, I return to first principles to separate concerns and distinguish more than 50 foundational concepts. This allows me to establish six rules that allow one to identify which pair is correct. The choice depends on the context in which the classifier is to operate, the intended use of the classifications, their intended user(s), and the measurability of the underlying classes, but not skew. The rules can be applied by those who develop, operate, or regulate them to classifiers composed of technology, people, or combinations of the two.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Classification\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Classification\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-024-09478-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Classification","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-024-09478-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多二元分类器的评估都是从采用一对指标开始的,最常见的是灵敏度和特异性或精确度和召回率。尽管如此,我们仍然缺乏一个通用的、泛学科的基础来选择一对指标或其他四对指标中的一对。在接收者操作特征和精确度-召回曲线之间进行选择时,也存在类似的模糊之处。在此,我回到第一原则,将关注点分开,并区分 50 多个基本概念。这样,我就可以建立六条规则,让人们确定哪一对是正确的。选择取决于分类器的运行环境、分类的预期用途、预期用户以及基础类别的可测量性,但不包括偏斜。这些规则可由开发、运行或管理分类器的人员应用于由技术、人员或二者组合而成的分类器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Sensitivity and Specificity versus Precision and Recall, and Related Dilemmas

Sensitivity and Specificity versus Precision and Recall, and Related Dilemmas

Many evaluations of binary classifiers begin by adopting a pair of indicators, most often sensitivity and specificity or precision and recall. Despite this, we lack a general, pan-disciplinary basis for choosing one pair over the other, or over one of four other sibling pairs. Related obscurity afflicts the choice between the receiver operating characteristic and the precision-recall curve. Here, I return to first principles to separate concerns and distinguish more than 50 foundational concepts. This allows me to establish six rules that allow one to identify which pair is correct. The choice depends on the context in which the classifier is to operate, the intended use of the classifications, their intended user(s), and the measurability of the underlying classes, but not skew. The rules can be applied by those who develop, operate, or regulate them to classifiers composed of technology, people, or combinations of the two.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Classification
Journal of Classification 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: To publish original and valuable papers in the field of classification, numerical taxonomy, multidimensional scaling and other ordination techniques, clustering, tree structures and other network models (with somewhat less emphasis on principal components analysis, factor analysis, and discriminant analysis), as well as associated models and algorithms for fitting them. Articles will support advances in methodology while demonstrating compelling substantive applications. Comprehensive review articles are also acceptable. Contributions will represent disciplines such as statistics, psychology, biology, information retrieval, anthropology, archeology, astronomy, business, chemistry, computer science, economics, engineering, geography, geology, linguistics, marketing, mathematics, medicine, political science, psychiatry, sociology, and soil science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信