印度各邦政府的初等教育成果效率:广义随机前沿方法

IF 1.9 Q2 ECONOMICS
Jyotsna Rosario, K.R. Shanmugam
{"title":"印度各邦政府的初等教育成果效率:广义随机前沿方法","authors":"Jyotsna Rosario, K.R. Shanmugam","doi":"10.1108/jes-11-2023-0649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to analyze the technical efficiency of Indian State governments in providing elementary education (EE) and to identify the determinants of their technical inefficiency.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The Generalized Stochastic Frontier Approach (GSFA) is used in the context of the Inefficiency Effects Model to simultaneously estimate the frontier production function and the technical inefficiency model. Panel data of 28 Indian States from 2009–10 to 2018–19 is used.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The mean efficiency of States stands at 86%. Efficiency varied between 67 and 97%. 96% of the inter-state disparity in EE outcomes can be explained by inefficiency. Arunachal Pradesh is the least efficient State, followed by Sikkim and Tripura. Efficiency estimates were observed to change across States over the study period. Proportion of government schools, rural population, and proportion of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe children are the major determinants of inefficiency.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>This study emphasizes that efficient resource management is as important as adequate resource allocation for achieving positive EE outcomes. It distinguishes resource-poor States from inefficient ones, providing insights to enhance States’ efficiency, and aiding policymakers in formulating strategies for ensuring equitable and quality EE.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This is the first paper to apply GSFA (for Indian States), providing a more robust estimation of efficiency. The Inefficiency Effects Model is employed that address the limitations inherent in the two-stage approach.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47604,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elementary education outcome efficiency of Indian state governments: a generalized stochastic frontier approach\",\"authors\":\"Jyotsna Rosario, K.R. Shanmugam\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jes-11-2023-0649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3>Purpose</h3>\\n<p>This paper aims to analyze the technical efficiency of Indian State governments in providing elementary education (EE) and to identify the determinants of their technical inefficiency.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\\n<p>The Generalized Stochastic Frontier Approach (GSFA) is used in the context of the Inefficiency Effects Model to simultaneously estimate the frontier production function and the technical inefficiency model. Panel data of 28 Indian States from 2009–10 to 2018–19 is used.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Findings</h3>\\n<p>The mean efficiency of States stands at 86%. Efficiency varied between 67 and 97%. 96% of the inter-state disparity in EE outcomes can be explained by inefficiency. Arunachal Pradesh is the least efficient State, followed by Sikkim and Tripura. Efficiency estimates were observed to change across States over the study period. Proportion of government schools, rural population, and proportion of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe children are the major determinants of inefficiency.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\\n<p>This study emphasizes that efficient resource management is as important as adequate resource allocation for achieving positive EE outcomes. It distinguishes resource-poor States from inefficient ones, providing insights to enhance States’ efficiency, and aiding policymakers in formulating strategies for ensuring equitable and quality EE.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\\n<p>This is the first paper to apply GSFA (for Indian States), providing a more robust estimation of efficiency. The Inefficiency Effects Model is employed that address the limitations inherent in the two-stage approach.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\",\"PeriodicalId\":47604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jes-11-2023-0649\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jes-11-2023-0649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在分析印度各邦政府在提供初等教育(EE)方面的技术效率,并确定其技术效率低下的决定因素。结果各邦的平均效率为 86%。效率介于 67% 和 97% 之间。96%的邦际教育成果差异可以用效率低下来解释。阿鲁纳恰尔邦是效率最低的邦,其次是锡金和特里普拉邦。据观察,各邦的效率估计值在研究期间有所变化。公立学校的比例、农村人口以及在册种姓和在册部落儿童的比例是决定效率低下的主要因素。它将资源贫乏的邦与效率低下的邦区分开来,为提高各邦的效率提供了启示,并帮助政策制定者制定战略,确保公平和高质量的幼儿教育。本文采用了 "效率效应模型",以解决两阶段方法固有的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Elementary education outcome efficiency of Indian state governments: a generalized stochastic frontier approach

Purpose

This paper aims to analyze the technical efficiency of Indian State governments in providing elementary education (EE) and to identify the determinants of their technical inefficiency.

Design/methodology/approach

The Generalized Stochastic Frontier Approach (GSFA) is used in the context of the Inefficiency Effects Model to simultaneously estimate the frontier production function and the technical inefficiency model. Panel data of 28 Indian States from 2009–10 to 2018–19 is used.

Findings

The mean efficiency of States stands at 86%. Efficiency varied between 67 and 97%. 96% of the inter-state disparity in EE outcomes can be explained by inefficiency. Arunachal Pradesh is the least efficient State, followed by Sikkim and Tripura. Efficiency estimates were observed to change across States over the study period. Proportion of government schools, rural population, and proportion of Schedule Caste and Schedule Tribe children are the major determinants of inefficiency.

Practical implications

This study emphasizes that efficient resource management is as important as adequate resource allocation for achieving positive EE outcomes. It distinguishes resource-poor States from inefficient ones, providing insights to enhance States’ efficiency, and aiding policymakers in formulating strategies for ensuring equitable and quality EE.

Originality/value

This is the first paper to apply GSFA (for Indian States), providing a more robust estimation of efficiency. The Inefficiency Effects Model is employed that address the limitations inherent in the two-stage approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Economic Studies publishes high quality research findings and commentary on international developments in economics. The journal maintains a sound balance between economic theory and application at both the micro and the macro levels. Articles on economic issues between individual nations, emerging and evolving trading blocs are particularly welcomed. Contributors are encouraged to spell out the practical implications of their work for economists in government and industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信