Yuan Kang, Sheng-Yen Hu, Huang-Wen Chen, Kai-Man Au, Chao-Ping Huang, Hsin Ming Fu
{"title":"单作用锥形阀芯限位器设计参数的确定方法","authors":"Yuan Kang, Sheng-Yen Hu, Huang-Wen Chen, Kai-Man Au, Chao-Ping Huang, Hsin Ming Fu","doi":"10.1007/s10999-024-09718-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The performances of a hydrostatic bearing using the tapered-spool restrictors with appropriate design parameters is superior to other types of pressure compensation, that is the largest stiffness obtained under the lowest power consumption of supplying lubricant. However, the determination of design parameters is difficult, moreover, the simplification of the calculation formula will cause errors. Therefore, this study presents a method for identifying actual design parameters of the single‐action tapered-spool restrictor for actant values. Also, the influences of design parameters on the relationships between flow rate and pressure drop of this type restrictors are studied by both theoretical and experimental analyses. There are three design parameters that affect the characteristics of the tapered-spool restrictor, namely restriction parameter, compliance parameter, and restriction length ratio. Since both compliance parameter and restriction length ratio are functions of supply pressure, design parameters of a restrictor are determined simultaneously by solving a set of identification equations individually for the nominal value of each supply pressure. These identification equations are obtained by minimizing the sum of squared errors between the actual flow rate measured from experimental data and the flow rate calculated from the identification equations. Additionally, the advantages of the tapered-spool restrictors compared with other pressure compensation methods as well as the difficulties and errors in calculating design parameters are further elaborated in this study. Therefore, in order to design the appropriate parameters to match the hydrostatic bearing, the design parameters need to be identified when designing and calibrating such restrictors.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":593,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design","volume":"20 6","pages":"1119 - 1145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification method for design parameters of single-action tapered spool restrictors\",\"authors\":\"Yuan Kang, Sheng-Yen Hu, Huang-Wen Chen, Kai-Man Au, Chao-Ping Huang, Hsin Ming Fu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10999-024-09718-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The performances of a hydrostatic bearing using the tapered-spool restrictors with appropriate design parameters is superior to other types of pressure compensation, that is the largest stiffness obtained under the lowest power consumption of supplying lubricant. However, the determination of design parameters is difficult, moreover, the simplification of the calculation formula will cause errors. Therefore, this study presents a method for identifying actual design parameters of the single‐action tapered-spool restrictor for actant values. Also, the influences of design parameters on the relationships between flow rate and pressure drop of this type restrictors are studied by both theoretical and experimental analyses. There are three design parameters that affect the characteristics of the tapered-spool restrictor, namely restriction parameter, compliance parameter, and restriction length ratio. Since both compliance parameter and restriction length ratio are functions of supply pressure, design parameters of a restrictor are determined simultaneously by solving a set of identification equations individually for the nominal value of each supply pressure. These identification equations are obtained by minimizing the sum of squared errors between the actual flow rate measured from experimental data and the flow rate calculated from the identification equations. Additionally, the advantages of the tapered-spool restrictors compared with other pressure compensation methods as well as the difficulties and errors in calculating design parameters are further elaborated in this study. Therefore, in order to design the appropriate parameters to match the hydrostatic bearing, the design parameters need to be identified when designing and calibrating such restrictors.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design\",\"volume\":\"20 6\",\"pages\":\"1119 - 1145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10999-024-09718-4\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10999-024-09718-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Identification method for design parameters of single-action tapered spool restrictors
The performances of a hydrostatic bearing using the tapered-spool restrictors with appropriate design parameters is superior to other types of pressure compensation, that is the largest stiffness obtained under the lowest power consumption of supplying lubricant. However, the determination of design parameters is difficult, moreover, the simplification of the calculation formula will cause errors. Therefore, this study presents a method for identifying actual design parameters of the single‐action tapered-spool restrictor for actant values. Also, the influences of design parameters on the relationships between flow rate and pressure drop of this type restrictors are studied by both theoretical and experimental analyses. There are three design parameters that affect the characteristics of the tapered-spool restrictor, namely restriction parameter, compliance parameter, and restriction length ratio. Since both compliance parameter and restriction length ratio are functions of supply pressure, design parameters of a restrictor are determined simultaneously by solving a set of identification equations individually for the nominal value of each supply pressure. These identification equations are obtained by minimizing the sum of squared errors between the actual flow rate measured from experimental data and the flow rate calculated from the identification equations. Additionally, the advantages of the tapered-spool restrictors compared with other pressure compensation methods as well as the difficulties and errors in calculating design parameters are further elaborated in this study. Therefore, in order to design the appropriate parameters to match the hydrostatic bearing, the design parameters need to be identified when designing and calibrating such restrictors.
期刊介绍:
It is the objective of this journal to provide an effective medium for the dissemination of recent advances and original works in mechanics and materials'' engineering and their impact on the design process in an integrated, highly focused and coherent format. The goal is to enable mechanical, aeronautical, civil, automotive, biomedical, chemical and nuclear engineers, researchers and scientists to keep abreast of recent developments and exchange ideas on a number of topics relating to the use of mechanics and materials in design.
Analytical synopsis of contents:
The following non-exhaustive list is considered to be within the scope of the International Journal of Mechanics and Materials in Design:
Intelligent Design:
Nano-engineering and Nano-science in Design;
Smart Materials and Adaptive Structures in Design;
Mechanism(s) Design;
Design against Failure;
Design for Manufacturing;
Design of Ultralight Structures;
Design for a Clean Environment;
Impact and Crashworthiness;
Microelectronic Packaging Systems.
Advanced Materials in Design:
Newly Engineered Materials;
Smart Materials and Adaptive Structures;
Micromechanical Modelling of Composites;
Damage Characterisation of Advanced/Traditional Materials;
Alternative Use of Traditional Materials in Design;
Functionally Graded Materials;
Failure Analysis: Fatigue and Fracture;
Multiscale Modelling Concepts and Methodology;
Interfaces, interfacial properties and characterisation.
Design Analysis and Optimisation:
Shape and Topology Optimisation;
Structural Optimisation;
Optimisation Algorithms in Design;
Nonlinear Mechanics in Design;
Novel Numerical Tools in Design;
Geometric Modelling and CAD Tools in Design;
FEM, BEM and Hybrid Methods;
Integrated Computer Aided Design;
Computational Failure Analysis;
Coupled Thermo-Electro-Mechanical Designs.