约翰-舍伍德与十五世纪末英国对普鲁塔克《生平》的解读☆。

IF 0.3 3区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
Matthew Day
{"title":"约翰-舍伍德与十五世纪末英国对普鲁塔克《生平》的解读☆。","authors":"Matthew Day","doi":"10.1111/rest.12942","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the fifteenth century, Plutarch's <jats:italic>Lives</jats:italic> were popular among humanists for their moral and historical content. They circulated widely in humanist Latin translations in manuscript and later in print. This article examines the reading of printed copies of these translations in late fifteenth‐century England. It focuses on John Shirwood (d. 1493), Bishop of Durham, an avid English reader of humanist books. The article suggests that Shirwood's annotations to Plutarch should be interpreted as evidence of humanist reading in a recreational context. While modern studies on the history of reading classical texts have often emphasised Renaissance readers' structured, methodical approaches of annotation, Shirwood's copy of Plutarch's <jats:italic>Lives</jats:italic> reveals a clerk at leisure, enjoying humanist books outside of formal academic study. The article goes on to compare Shirwood's annotations of Plutarch's Lives with those of two other late fifteenth‐century English humanists: the similarly eclectic historical annotations of the bishop John Russell (d. 1494); and, as a counterpoint, the more structured moral and linguistic interests of the grammarian John Stanbridge (1463–1510). These three responses to the Latin translations of Plutarch's <jats:italic>Lives</jats:italic> thus indicate how educated individuals engaged with humanist texts at different levels of rigour, from methodical academic study to recreational enjoyment.","PeriodicalId":45351,"journal":{"name":"Renaissance Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"John Shirwood and the reading of Plutarch's Lives in late fifteenth‐century England☆\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Day\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/rest.12942\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the fifteenth century, Plutarch's <jats:italic>Lives</jats:italic> were popular among humanists for their moral and historical content. They circulated widely in humanist Latin translations in manuscript and later in print. This article examines the reading of printed copies of these translations in late fifteenth‐century England. It focuses on John Shirwood (d. 1493), Bishop of Durham, an avid English reader of humanist books. The article suggests that Shirwood's annotations to Plutarch should be interpreted as evidence of humanist reading in a recreational context. While modern studies on the history of reading classical texts have often emphasised Renaissance readers' structured, methodical approaches of annotation, Shirwood's copy of Plutarch's <jats:italic>Lives</jats:italic> reveals a clerk at leisure, enjoying humanist books outside of formal academic study. The article goes on to compare Shirwood's annotations of Plutarch's Lives with those of two other late fifteenth‐century English humanists: the similarly eclectic historical annotations of the bishop John Russell (d. 1494); and, as a counterpoint, the more structured moral and linguistic interests of the grammarian John Stanbridge (1463–1510). These three responses to the Latin translations of Plutarch's <jats:italic>Lives</jats:italic> thus indicate how educated individuals engaged with humanist texts at different levels of rigour, from methodical academic study to recreational enjoyment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renaissance Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renaissance Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/rest.12942\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renaissance Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/rest.12942","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

15 世纪,普鲁塔克的《生平》因其道德和历史内容而受到人文主义者的欢迎。这些作品以人文主义拉丁语译本的手稿和后来的印刷品形式广泛流传。本文探讨了 15 世纪晚期英国对这些译本印刷本的阅读情况。文章以英国达勒姆主教约翰-舍伍德(卒于 1493 年)为中心,他是人文主义书籍的狂热读者。文章认为,希尔伍德对普鲁塔克的注释应被解释为人文主义在娱乐背景下阅读的证据。有关古典文献阅读史的现代研究通常强调文艺复兴时期读者有条理、有方法的注释方法,而舍伍德的《普鲁塔克生平》副本则揭示了一位文员在正式学术研究之外享受人文主义书籍的闲暇时光。文章还将白尔伍德对《普鲁塔克生平》的注释与 15 世纪晚期另外两位英国人文学者的注释进行了比较:约翰-拉塞尔主教(卒于 1494 年)的历史注释同样兼收并蓄;作为对立面,语法学家约翰-斯坦布里奇(1463-1510 年)的道德和语言兴趣则更加条理清晰。因此,这三种对《普鲁塔克生平》拉丁文译本的回应表明了受过教育的人是如何以不同的严谨程度(从有条不紊的学术研究到休闲娱乐)参与人文主义文本的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
John Shirwood and the reading of Plutarch's Lives in late fifteenth‐century England☆
In the fifteenth century, Plutarch's Lives were popular among humanists for their moral and historical content. They circulated widely in humanist Latin translations in manuscript and later in print. This article examines the reading of printed copies of these translations in late fifteenth‐century England. It focuses on John Shirwood (d. 1493), Bishop of Durham, an avid English reader of humanist books. The article suggests that Shirwood's annotations to Plutarch should be interpreted as evidence of humanist reading in a recreational context. While modern studies on the history of reading classical texts have often emphasised Renaissance readers' structured, methodical approaches of annotation, Shirwood's copy of Plutarch's Lives reveals a clerk at leisure, enjoying humanist books outside of formal academic study. The article goes on to compare Shirwood's annotations of Plutarch's Lives with those of two other late fifteenth‐century English humanists: the similarly eclectic historical annotations of the bishop John Russell (d. 1494); and, as a counterpoint, the more structured moral and linguistic interests of the grammarian John Stanbridge (1463–1510). These three responses to the Latin translations of Plutarch's Lives thus indicate how educated individuals engaged with humanist texts at different levels of rigour, from methodical academic study to recreational enjoyment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Renaissance Studies
Renaissance Studies MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
期刊介绍: Renaissance Studies is a multi-disciplinary journal which publishes articles and editions of documents on all aspects of Renaissance history and culture. The articles range over the history, art, architecture, religion, literature, and languages of Europe during the period.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信