实验和计算保真度的变化对数据同化方法的影响

IF 2.2 3区 工程技术 Q2 MECHANICS
Craig Thompson, Uttam Cadambi Padmanaban, Bharathram Ganapathisubramani, Sean Symon
{"title":"实验和计算保真度的变化对数据同化方法的影响","authors":"Craig Thompson,&nbsp;Uttam Cadambi Padmanaban,&nbsp;Bharathram Ganapathisubramani,&nbsp;Sean Symon","doi":"10.1007/s00162-024-00708-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We conduct a comprehensive analysis of two data assimilation methods: the first utilizes the discrete adjoint approach with a correction applied to the production term of the turbulence transport equation, preserving the Boussinesq approximation. The second is a state observer method that implements a correction in the momentum equations alongside a turbulence model, both applied to fluid dynamics simulations. We investigate the impact of varying computational mesh resolutions and experimental data resolutions on the performance of these methods within the context of a periodic hill test case. Our findings reveal the distinct strengths and limitations of both methods, which successfully assimilate data to improve the accuracy of a RANS simulation. The performance of the variational model correction method is independent of input data and computational mesh resolutions. The state observer method, on the other hand, is sensitive to the resolution of the input data and CFD mesh.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":795,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics","volume":"38 3","pages":"431 - 450"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00162-024-00708-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of variations in experimental and computational fidelity on data assimilation approaches\",\"authors\":\"Craig Thompson,&nbsp;Uttam Cadambi Padmanaban,&nbsp;Bharathram Ganapathisubramani,&nbsp;Sean Symon\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00162-024-00708-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We conduct a comprehensive analysis of two data assimilation methods: the first utilizes the discrete adjoint approach with a correction applied to the production term of the turbulence transport equation, preserving the Boussinesq approximation. The second is a state observer method that implements a correction in the momentum equations alongside a turbulence model, both applied to fluid dynamics simulations. We investigate the impact of varying computational mesh resolutions and experimental data resolutions on the performance of these methods within the context of a periodic hill test case. Our findings reveal the distinct strengths and limitations of both methods, which successfully assimilate data to improve the accuracy of a RANS simulation. The performance of the variational model correction method is independent of input data and computational mesh resolutions. The state observer method, on the other hand, is sensitive to the resolution of the input data and CFD mesh.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":795,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics\",\"volume\":\"38 3\",\"pages\":\"431 - 450\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00162-024-00708-y.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00162-024-00708-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MECHANICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00162-024-00708-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们对两种数据同化方法进行了全面分析:第一种方法采用离散邻接法,对湍流传输方程的生成项进行修正,保留了布辛斯基近似。第二种是状态观测器方法,在湍流模型的同时对动量方程进行修正,这两种方法都适用于流体动力学模拟。我们在周期性山丘测试案例中研究了不同计算网格分辨率和实验数据分辨率对这些方法性能的影响。我们的研究结果揭示了这两种方法的明显优势和局限性,它们都成功地吸收了数据,提高了 RANS 模拟的精度。变分模型修正方法的性能与输入数据和计算网格分辨率无关。而状态观测器方法则对输入数据和 CFD 网格的分辨率非常敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The effect of variations in experimental and computational fidelity on data assimilation approaches

The effect of variations in experimental and computational fidelity on data assimilation approaches

We conduct a comprehensive analysis of two data assimilation methods: the first utilizes the discrete adjoint approach with a correction applied to the production term of the turbulence transport equation, preserving the Boussinesq approximation. The second is a state observer method that implements a correction in the momentum equations alongside a turbulence model, both applied to fluid dynamics simulations. We investigate the impact of varying computational mesh resolutions and experimental data resolutions on the performance of these methods within the context of a periodic hill test case. Our findings reveal the distinct strengths and limitations of both methods, which successfully assimilate data to improve the accuracy of a RANS simulation. The performance of the variational model correction method is independent of input data and computational mesh resolutions. The state observer method, on the other hand, is sensitive to the resolution of the input data and CFD mesh.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
38
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics provides a forum for the cross fertilization of ideas, tools and techniques across all disciplines in which fluid flow plays a role. The focus is on aspects of fluid dynamics where theory and computation are used to provide insights and data upon which solid physical understanding is revealed. We seek research papers, invited review articles, brief communications, letters and comments addressing flow phenomena of relevance to aeronautical, geophysical, environmental, material, mechanical and life sciences. Papers of a purely algorithmic, experimental or engineering application nature, and papers without significant new physical insights, are outside the scope of this journal. For computational work, authors are responsible for ensuring that any artifacts of discretization and/or implementation are sufficiently controlled such that the numerical results unambiguously support the conclusions drawn. Where appropriate, and to the extent possible, such papers should either include or reference supporting documentation in the form of verification and validation studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信