具有小开口的高含量再生骨料混凝土复合楼板的防火性能

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Fetih Kefyalew, Thanongsak Imjai, Reyes Garcia, Nguyen Khanh Son
{"title":"具有小开口的高含量再生骨料混凝土复合楼板的防火性能","authors":"Fetih Kefyalew, Thanongsak Imjai, Reyes Garcia, Nguyen Khanh Son","doi":"10.1002/suco.202400242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) is increasingly being used in the construction of structural elements. However, the performance of RAC elements under fire is usually considered to be inferior to that of normal concrete (NC) elements. This study investigates the fire behavior of RAC composite steel slabs with and without openings. Ten slabs of size of 1.0 m × 2.2 m were cast either with no opening, one or two circular openings, and one or two square openings. Five of the slabs were manufactured with 100% RAC, while the other five slabs were made with NC. The concrete slabs were loaded and subjected to fire tests at a temperature of about 900°C for 120 min. Test results show that RAC composite slabs have lower stiffness (thus larger mid‐span deflections) under fire exposure compared to their counterpart NC slabs. In terms of the recorded temperature–time curves, RAC slabs showed similar performance to that of NC slabs. The ratio of soffit temperature to the temperature at the top of slab was considerably smaller for RAC slabs compared to NC slabs. RAC slabs also showed more spalling than NC slabs. Experimental test results were numerically verified using PyroSim® software with the two showing good agreement. A series of new design charts for composite RAC slabs with desired fire endurance are proposed. This study is expected to promote the wider use of RAC in construction of structural elements, particularly of composite slabs exposed to extreme temperatures.","PeriodicalId":21988,"journal":{"name":"Structural Concrete","volume":"344 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fire behavior of high‐contents recycled aggregate concrete composite slabs with small openings\",\"authors\":\"Fetih Kefyalew, Thanongsak Imjai, Reyes Garcia, Nguyen Khanh Son\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/suco.202400242\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) is increasingly being used in the construction of structural elements. However, the performance of RAC elements under fire is usually considered to be inferior to that of normal concrete (NC) elements. This study investigates the fire behavior of RAC composite steel slabs with and without openings. Ten slabs of size of 1.0 m × 2.2 m were cast either with no opening, one or two circular openings, and one or two square openings. Five of the slabs were manufactured with 100% RAC, while the other five slabs were made with NC. The concrete slabs were loaded and subjected to fire tests at a temperature of about 900°C for 120 min. Test results show that RAC composite slabs have lower stiffness (thus larger mid‐span deflections) under fire exposure compared to their counterpart NC slabs. In terms of the recorded temperature–time curves, RAC slabs showed similar performance to that of NC slabs. The ratio of soffit temperature to the temperature at the top of slab was considerably smaller for RAC slabs compared to NC slabs. RAC slabs also showed more spalling than NC slabs. Experimental test results were numerically verified using PyroSim® software with the two showing good agreement. A series of new design charts for composite RAC slabs with desired fire endurance are proposed. This study is expected to promote the wider use of RAC in construction of structural elements, particularly of composite slabs exposed to extreme temperatures.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Structural Concrete\",\"volume\":\"344 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Structural Concrete\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202400242\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Concrete","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202400242","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

再生骨料混凝土(RAC)越来越多地用于结构构件的建造。然而,RAC 构件在火灾中的性能通常被认为不如普通混凝土(NC)构件。本研究调查了有开口和无开口 RAC 复合钢板的火灾行为。十块尺寸为 1.0 m × 2.2 m 的板被浇铸成无开口、一个或两个圆形开口、一个或两个方形开口。其中五块板是用 100% 的 RAC 制造的,而另外五块板是用 NC 制造的。对混凝土板进行了加载,并在约 900°C 的温度下进行了 120 分钟的耐火试验。试验结果表明,与 NC 板相比,RAC 复合板在火灾中的刚度较低(因此跨中挠度较大)。从记录的温度-时间曲线来看,RAC 板的性能与 NC 板相似。与 NC 板相比,RAC 板的底部温度与板顶温度之比要小得多。RAC 板的剥落程度也高于 NC 板。使用 PyroSim® 软件对实验测试结果进行了数值验证,两者显示出良好的一致性。研究提出了一系列具有理想耐火性能的复合 RAC 板的新设计图表。这项研究有望促进 RAC 在结构元件建造中的广泛应用,尤其是暴露在极端温度下的复合板。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fire behavior of high‐contents recycled aggregate concrete composite slabs with small openings
Recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) is increasingly being used in the construction of structural elements. However, the performance of RAC elements under fire is usually considered to be inferior to that of normal concrete (NC) elements. This study investigates the fire behavior of RAC composite steel slabs with and without openings. Ten slabs of size of 1.0 m × 2.2 m were cast either with no opening, one or two circular openings, and one or two square openings. Five of the slabs were manufactured with 100% RAC, while the other five slabs were made with NC. The concrete slabs were loaded and subjected to fire tests at a temperature of about 900°C for 120 min. Test results show that RAC composite slabs have lower stiffness (thus larger mid‐span deflections) under fire exposure compared to their counterpart NC slabs. In terms of the recorded temperature–time curves, RAC slabs showed similar performance to that of NC slabs. The ratio of soffit temperature to the temperature at the top of slab was considerably smaller for RAC slabs compared to NC slabs. RAC slabs also showed more spalling than NC slabs. Experimental test results were numerically verified using PyroSim® software with the two showing good agreement. A series of new design charts for composite RAC slabs with desired fire endurance are proposed. This study is expected to promote the wider use of RAC in construction of structural elements, particularly of composite slabs exposed to extreme temperatures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Structural Concrete
Structural Concrete CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-ENGINEERING, CIVIL
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
15.60%
发文量
284
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Structural Concrete, the official journal of the fib, provides conceptual and procedural guidance in the field of concrete construction, and features peer-reviewed papers, keynote research and industry news covering all aspects of the design, construction, performance in service and demolition of concrete structures. Main topics: design, construction, performance in service, conservation (assessment, maintenance, strengthening) and demolition of concrete structures research about the behaviour of concrete structures development of design methods fib Model Code sustainability of concrete structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信