Abe Alexander, Jesse Moestaredjo, Mart Heuvelmans, Lars Fritz
{"title":"收费选择在 AMM 创收中的作用:定量研究","authors":"Abe Alexander, Jesse Moestaredjo, Mart Heuvelmans, Lars Fritz","doi":"arxiv-2406.12417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the ever evolving landscape of decentralized finance automated market\nmakers (AMMs) play a key role: they provide a market place for trading assets\nin a decentralized manner. For so-called bluechip pairs, arbitrage activity\nprovides a major part of the revenue generation of AMMs but also a major source\nof loss due to the so-called 'informed orderflow'. Finding ways to minimize\nthose losses while still keeping uninformed trading activity alive is a major\nproblem in the field. In this paper we will investigate the mechanics of said\narbitrage and try to understand how AMMs can maximize the revenue creation or\nin other words minimize the losses. To that end, we model the dynamics of\narbitrage activity for a concrete implementation of a pool and study its\nsensitivity to the choice of fee aiming to maximize the revenue for the AMM. We\nidentify dynamical fees that mimic the directionality of the price due to\nasymmetric fee choices as a promising avenue to mitigate losses to toxic flow.\nThis work is based on and extends a recent article by some of the authors.","PeriodicalId":501139,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Statistical Finance","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of fee choice in revenue generation of AMMs: A quantitative study\",\"authors\":\"Abe Alexander, Jesse Moestaredjo, Mart Heuvelmans, Lars Fritz\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2406.12417\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the ever evolving landscape of decentralized finance automated market\\nmakers (AMMs) play a key role: they provide a market place for trading assets\\nin a decentralized manner. For so-called bluechip pairs, arbitrage activity\\nprovides a major part of the revenue generation of AMMs but also a major source\\nof loss due to the so-called 'informed orderflow'. Finding ways to minimize\\nthose losses while still keeping uninformed trading activity alive is a major\\nproblem in the field. In this paper we will investigate the mechanics of said\\narbitrage and try to understand how AMMs can maximize the revenue creation or\\nin other words minimize the losses. To that end, we model the dynamics of\\narbitrage activity for a concrete implementation of a pool and study its\\nsensitivity to the choice of fee aiming to maximize the revenue for the AMM. We\\nidentify dynamical fees that mimic the directionality of the price due to\\nasymmetric fee choices as a promising avenue to mitigate losses to toxic flow.\\nThis work is based on and extends a recent article by some of the authors.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501139,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Statistical Finance\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - QuantFin - Statistical Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2406.12417\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Statistical Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2406.12417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Role of fee choice in revenue generation of AMMs: A quantitative study
In the ever evolving landscape of decentralized finance automated market
makers (AMMs) play a key role: they provide a market place for trading assets
in a decentralized manner. For so-called bluechip pairs, arbitrage activity
provides a major part of the revenue generation of AMMs but also a major source
of loss due to the so-called 'informed orderflow'. Finding ways to minimize
those losses while still keeping uninformed trading activity alive is a major
problem in the field. In this paper we will investigate the mechanics of said
arbitrage and try to understand how AMMs can maximize the revenue creation or
in other words minimize the losses. To that end, we model the dynamics of
arbitrage activity for a concrete implementation of a pool and study its
sensitivity to the choice of fee aiming to maximize the revenue for the AMM. We
identify dynamical fees that mimic the directionality of the price due to
asymmetric fee choices as a promising avenue to mitigate losses to toxic flow.
This work is based on and extends a recent article by some of the authors.