{"title":"强化再生骨料混凝土梁的单调和循环行为","authors":"Anh-Tuan Le, Vui Van Cao","doi":"10.1007/s40999-024-00997-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study experimentally investigated the behavior of reinforced recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) beams under monotonic and cyclic loadings to identify the advantages and shortcomings of RAC in reinforced concrete beams. Five RAC specimens and one normal aggregate concrete (NAC) specimen were tested to failure. The concrete compositions of RAC and NAC were similar; however, the coarse aggregate of RAC was recycled coarse aggregate, while that of NAC was normal stone coarse aggregate. Results indicated similarities in the failure modes of RAC and NAC beams. Compared with NAC beams, the yield and ultimate load-carrying capacities of RAC beams were only 2.6% and 8.9% lower, respectively. The cyclic loading effect negligibly induced strength degradation but decreased ductility by 9.1%. However, the yield deflection and yield stiffness of RAC beams were 22.9% higher and 30% lower than those of NAC beams, revealing their shortcomings. The above results emphasized the potential use of RAC in structural members by addressing the high deformation characteristic of RAC (e.g., modifying the concrete composition to increase the compressive strength of RAC). The nonlinear analytical method of NAC beams, in which the fiber model and the finite element method were finally combined, can be used for RAC beam analysis with acceptable accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":50331,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Civil Engineering","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Monotonic and Cyclic Behaviors of Reinforced Recycled Aggregate Concrete Beams\",\"authors\":\"Anh-Tuan Le, Vui Van Cao\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40999-024-00997-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study experimentally investigated the behavior of reinforced recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) beams under monotonic and cyclic loadings to identify the advantages and shortcomings of RAC in reinforced concrete beams. Five RAC specimens and one normal aggregate concrete (NAC) specimen were tested to failure. The concrete compositions of RAC and NAC were similar; however, the coarse aggregate of RAC was recycled coarse aggregate, while that of NAC was normal stone coarse aggregate. Results indicated similarities in the failure modes of RAC and NAC beams. Compared with NAC beams, the yield and ultimate load-carrying capacities of RAC beams were only 2.6% and 8.9% lower, respectively. The cyclic loading effect negligibly induced strength degradation but decreased ductility by 9.1%. However, the yield deflection and yield stiffness of RAC beams were 22.9% higher and 30% lower than those of NAC beams, revealing their shortcomings. The above results emphasized the potential use of RAC in structural members by addressing the high deformation characteristic of RAC (e.g., modifying the concrete composition to increase the compressive strength of RAC). The nonlinear analytical method of NAC beams, in which the fiber model and the finite element method were finally combined, can be used for RAC beam analysis with acceptable accuracy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Civil Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-024-00997-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Civil Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-024-00997-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Monotonic and Cyclic Behaviors of Reinforced Recycled Aggregate Concrete Beams
This study experimentally investigated the behavior of reinforced recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) beams under monotonic and cyclic loadings to identify the advantages and shortcomings of RAC in reinforced concrete beams. Five RAC specimens and one normal aggregate concrete (NAC) specimen were tested to failure. The concrete compositions of RAC and NAC were similar; however, the coarse aggregate of RAC was recycled coarse aggregate, while that of NAC was normal stone coarse aggregate. Results indicated similarities in the failure modes of RAC and NAC beams. Compared with NAC beams, the yield and ultimate load-carrying capacities of RAC beams were only 2.6% and 8.9% lower, respectively. The cyclic loading effect negligibly induced strength degradation but decreased ductility by 9.1%. However, the yield deflection and yield stiffness of RAC beams were 22.9% higher and 30% lower than those of NAC beams, revealing their shortcomings. The above results emphasized the potential use of RAC in structural members by addressing the high deformation characteristic of RAC (e.g., modifying the concrete composition to increase the compressive strength of RAC). The nonlinear analytical method of NAC beams, in which the fiber model and the finite element method were finally combined, can be used for RAC beam analysis with acceptable accuracy.
期刊介绍:
International Journal of Civil Engineering, The official publication of Iranian Society of Civil Engineering and Iran University of Science and Technology is devoted to original and interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed papers on research related to the broad spectrum of civil engineering with similar emphasis on all topics.The journal provides a forum for the International Civil Engineering Community to present and discuss matters of major interest e.g. new developments in civil regulations, The topics are included but are not necessarily restricted to :- Structures- Geotechnics- Transportation- Environment- Earthquakes- Water Resources- Construction Engineering and Management, and New Materials.